Toulon

Despite substantial progress made in the first- and second line mCRC settings, there are still unmet clinical needs for patients harboring BRAFV600E mutations, especially those with microsatellite stability (MSS) / proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumor. The overall survival and access to different treatment in the real-life setting are unknown. Moreover, patient prognosis remains poor and therapeutic resistance to combinations with BRAF inhibitors, is at present, nearly universal. Therefore, it seems essential to prospectively collect clinical and biological data about this rare mCRC subtype. These data will allow us to improve knowledge and to identify clinical and biological factors that could drive therapeutic decisions, predict resistance to treatments, and that are prognostic for survival. In this context, we designed this large, prospective, cohort study to collect clinical data and biological samples to be used for research but also to gather real-world clinical data concerning the treatments and the survival outcomes in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. This collection of clinical and biological data (tumor tissue and blood samples) will allow us to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers with several research work packages planned: i. To evaluate the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during the metastatic first-, second-, and third-line treatment to: * Evaluate its positive and negative predictive value. * Identify molecular alterations preceding and explaining clinical resistance during BRAF/EGFR inhibition therapy and immunotherapy. ii. To evaluate BRAFV600E mCRC immune environment both at the tumor and blood level (immunomonitoring). iii. To study specific the dMMR/MSI BRAFV600E subgroup. Furthermore, the data collected will describe the therapeutic management of BRAFV600E mCRC patients in the routine-practice setting which will bring very useful data. The results of the COBRAF study could lay the groundwork to better understand BRAFV600E mCRC and to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers helping the development of new therapeutic approaches in this population.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a 1L treatment for patients with non-squamous mNSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 (TC ≥ 1%).

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

In this study, data from patients with INS will be recorded prospectively, regularly and systematically. The cohort will be composed of patients followed by pediatric nephrologists affiliated with the SNP. Metropolitan France, Reunion Island and Mayotte are the geographical areas concerned. It is planned to integrate other French overseas departments and territories, in particular the West Indies. This is therefore a prospective, multicenter, cohort follow-up study. The data will be centralized via a secure website dedicated to the study. Data will be obtained from: * Medical record data (hospitalization/consultations) as part of routine clinical follow-up for patients with active disease. This information will be medically validated and integrated into the database with the help of clinical research staff. * A telephone interview for annual follow-ups for patients whose absence of active disease no longer requires a systematic medical visit. This structured interview will be administered by telephone by the study's clinical research staff. * Self-administered or hetero-administered quality of life questionnaires (PEDS-QL), self-administered or hetero-administered treatment compliance questionnaires (Morisky's Score), and questionnaires on the aesthetic impact of treatments (Ferriman's Score). These questionnaires will be centralized and reported to the database by the study's clinical research staff.

IFCT-2202 ROSIE study aims to incorporate a broad-panel centralized NGS testing at baseline in all patients with completely resected NSCLC with common EGFR mutation after confirmation of an optimal preoperative extension assessment and with a centralized review of the quality of the surgical excision. Furthermore, the IFCT-2202 ROSIE study also aims to study the molecular events associated with relapse on, or after osimertinib exposure, that should result in the opportunity to accede to optimal treatment in case of metastatic relapse.

This registry evaluates patient characteristics, real-world treatment patterns, and short- and long-term outcomes in a population of patients in the United States and Europe with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who are receiving mavacamten, receiving other treatment for obstructive HCM, or not receiving treatment for obstructive HCM due to intolerance or failure of prior treatment. United States Sub-Study: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM in the real-world setting. Europe Sub-Study: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM in the real-world setting.

This study is to assess the burden of disease in adolescent and adult participants with moderate or severe alopecia areata (AA), non-segmental vitiligo (NSV), or moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in a large global real-world participant population.

The purpose of this study is to assess the real-world effectiveness of deucravacitinib treatment in adults diagnosed with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

The study is being done to see if ziltivekimab can be used to treat participants living with heart failure and inflammation. Participants will either get ziltivekimab (active medicine) or placebo (inactive substance that looks like the study medicine but does not contain any medicine). The treatment participants get is decided by chance. Participant's chance of getting ziltivekimab or placebo is the same. Ziltivekimab is not yet approved in any country or region in the world. It is a new medicine that doctors cannot prescribe. The study is expected to last for up to 1 year and 4 months.

This study will be done to see if ziltivekimab can be used to treat people living with heart failure and inflammation. Participants will either get ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will get study medicine for once-monthly injections either in a pre-filled syringe to inject the study medicine into a skinfold or a pen-injector to inject the study medicine into flat skin. The study is expected to last for up to 4 years. Participants will have up to 20 clinic visits. Participants will have to use a study app on their phone to record and share information about all their injections of study medicine and to fill in questionnaires.