Vandoeuvre Les Nancy

Since late 2019, the French association "MON PARCOURS DE VIE" has developed books donated by caregivers at cancer centers in France. These documents are available online: https://www.monparcoursdevie.fr/. They are highly acclaimed by women suffering from the breast cancer, as well as by caregivers. Four volumes have been written: 'Metastatic breast cancer', 'Localized breast cancer', 'Preserving my well-being', 'After breast cancer', and finally 'Breast cancer, support and accompaniment'. The aim in writing these information brochures is to provide clear, concise, useful information, with pedagogy, gentleness, benevolence, humility, cheerfulness, imagination, simplicity and an innovative presentation. These documents are a new and innovative method of providing information, delivered by caregivers who work with women suffering from breast cancer. It extends the human support so necessary in this disease. It seemed important to us to evaluate, through a clinical study, the impact of the written documents "Mon Parcours de Vie" - volume 2: Breast cancer and volume 3: Preserving my well-being, concerning the announcement of a localized breast cancer in the initial management for the first time in the breast pathway. The objectives of the clinical study are to evaluate the acceptability and impact of these two written information documents on anxiety generated by the announcement of cancer and treatment.

Novel treatments are urgently needed for meningiomas progressing after local therapies (surgery, radiotherapy). So far, no effective systemic therapies are known in this situation. The LUMEN-1 trial will investigate in a prospective randomized trial the efficacy of the precision medicine "theranostic" concept of combining diagnostic patient selection using PET-based molecular imaging and target-specific therapeutic intervention using a systemically administered radioligand. The rationale for the LUMEN-1 trial is based on the following: (a) high somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in meningiomas, (b) wide-spread availability of clinically established SSTR-PET imaging, (c) proven efficacy of SSTR-targeting radioligand therapy using \[177Lu\]Lu-DOTATATE in another tumor type (neuroendocrine tumors), and (d) promising experiences with \[177Lu\]Lu-DOTATATE therapy in compassionate use applications and retrospective case series and interim results from one ongoing uncontrolled prospective trial in meningiomas. LUMEN-1 is the first randomized clinical trial to investigate \[177Lu\]Lu-DOTATATE therapy in refractory meningioma and may open new avenues for treatment and research in this area.

Researchers want to learn if the study medicines calderasib and subcutaneous (SC) pembrolizumab can be used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when given together. Calderasib is a targeted therapy for the KRAS G12C mutation. The goal of this study is to learn if people who receive calderasib with SC pembrolizumab live longer without the cancer growing or spreading than in people who receive SC pembrolizumab with chemotherapy.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Researchers have designed a study medicine called ifinatamab deruxtecan (also called I-DXd or MK-2400) to treat mCRPC. The goal of this study is to learn if people who receive I-DXd live longer overall and live longer without the cancer growing or spreading than people who receive chemotherapy.

Despite substantial progress made in the first- and second line mCRC settings, there are still unmet clinical needs for patients harboring BRAFV600E mutations, especially those with microsatellite stability (MSS) / proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumor. The overall survival and access to different treatment in the real-life setting are unknown. Moreover, patient prognosis remains poor and therapeutic resistance to combinations with BRAF inhibitors, is at present, nearly universal. Therefore, it seems essential to prospectively collect clinical and biological data about this rare mCRC subtype. These data will allow us to improve knowledge and to identify clinical and biological factors that could drive therapeutic decisions, predict resistance to treatments, and that are prognostic for survival. In this context, we designed this large, prospective, cohort study to collect clinical data and biological samples to be used for research but also to gather real-world clinical data concerning the treatments and the survival outcomes in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. This collection of clinical and biological data (tumor tissue and blood samples) will allow us to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers with several research work packages planned: i. To evaluate the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during the metastatic first-, second-, and third-line treatment to: * Evaluate its positive and negative predictive value. * Identify molecular alterations preceding and explaining clinical resistance during BRAF/EGFR inhibition therapy and immunotherapy. ii. To evaluate BRAFV600E mCRC immune environment both at the tumor and blood level (immunomonitoring). iii. To study specific the dMMR/MSI BRAFV600E subgroup. Furthermore, the data collected will describe the therapeutic management of BRAFV600E mCRC patients in the routine-practice setting which will bring very useful data. The results of the COBRAF study could lay the groundwork to better understand BRAFV600E mCRC and to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers helping the development of new therapeutic approaches in this population.

The purpose of this study is to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose(s) (RP2D\[s\]) of bleximenib in phase 1 Part 1 (Dose Escalation) and to determine the safety and tolerability at RP2D in Phase 1 Part 2 (Dose expansion). The purpose of the Phase 2 part of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of bleximenib at the RP2D.

This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction therapy with 3 active dose regimens of MORF-057 versus matching placebo in adult study participants with moderately to severely active CD. After completion of the 14-week Induction Period, all participants will receive open-label MORF-057 during the 38-week Maintenance Period. All participants who complete the full 52-week Treatment Period will also have the opportunity to continue treatment in a 52-week Long-Term Extension.

Primary objectives This Phase 3 study is conducted to evaluate lanifibranor in adults with NASH and liver fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and consists of 2 sequential parts - an initial double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) period (Part A) followed by a double-blind active treatment extension (ATE) period (Part B), with the following primary objectives: Part A To assess the safety and efficacy of lanifibranor compared to placebo on 'NASH resolution and improvement of fibrosis' assessed by liver histology. Part B To assess the safety of lanifibranor beyond the DBPC period. Secondary objectives Key secondary objectives of Part 1: * To assess the effect of lanifibranor compared to placebo on NASH resolution and no worsening of fibrosis * To assess the effect of lanifibranor compared to placebo on improvement of fibrosis with no worsening of NASH Other secondary objectives of both Part 1 and Part 2: * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on other key histological features of NASH (only for DBPC period) * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on NASH resolution and improvement of fibrosis in diabetic patients (only for DBPC period) * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on liver tests * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on glycaemic parameters * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on lipid parameters * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on liver stiffness and steatosis assessed by elastography. * To assess the effect of lanifibranor on health-related quality of life * To assess the safety of lanifibranor * To assess population PK modeling through plasma levels of lanifibranor using sparse sampling scheme (only for DBPC period)

This is a phase 3 open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to compare petosemtamab vs investigator's choice monotherapy in HNSCC patients for the second- and third-line treatment of incurable metastatic/recurrent disease. HNSCC patients must have progressive disease (PD) on or after anti-PD-1 therapy and platinum-containing therapy. Patients treated with platinum-containing therapy only in the adjuvant setting, or in the context of multimodal therapy for locally advanced disease, should have PD within 6 months of the last dose of platinum-containing therapy.

This is a Phase 3 randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of petosemtamab plus pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab in first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic PD-L1+ HNSCC. HNSCC patients should not have had previous systemic therapy administered in the incurable recurrent or metastatic setting, although previous systemic therapy as part of multimodal treatment for locally advanced disease is allowed if PD was ≥6 months after the last platinum-containing therapy dose. Previous treatments with anti PD-(L)1 or anti-EGFR therapies are not allowed. In the case of cetuximab, patients who have received cetuximab with radiotherapy as a local treatment and PD was \>1 year after the last dose of cetuximab are eligible.