Dusseldorf

Participants eligible for this trial will be randomized 1:1 into one of the two arms (Arm A and Arm B) stratified by: I) -Previous anti-angiogenic therapy (yes vs. no), II) BRAF/RAS mutation status (wildtype vs. mutation) or III) History of liver metastases (never vs. prior but treated). Patients in Arm A (experimental arm) will receive Fruquintinib (orally, 5 mg once a day, at day 1-21 of each 28-day cycle \[Q4W\]) plus Tislelizumab (i.v., 400 mg, at day 1 of each 42-day cycle \[Q6W\]). Patients in Arm B (control arm) will receive Trifluridine/tipiracil (orally, 35 mg/m2 twice a day, day 1-5 and day 8-12 of each 28-day cycle \[Q4W\]) plus Bevacizumab (i.v., 5 mg/kg, at day 1 of each 14-day cycle \[Q2W\]). The treatment will be performed until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patients' request, or end of protocol-defined treatment time (maximum of 15 months). All patients will be followed up for a maximum of 18 months after last patient in or until death, withdrawal of consent or loss to follow-up, whatever occurs first.

Dental implants are a key modality for tooth replacement. Titanium dental implants have been the mainstay of dental implants as it osseointegrate well. Titanium has a silver gray metallic color and therefore, to hide its presence and enhance the aesthetic appearance, the implant is usually placed deeper into the bone tissue and the gums. This has negative consequences since it becomes more difficult to keep the interface between the dental implant and the crown free from bacterial plaque and inflammation. The use of zirconia（a base form of metal with similar properties of titanium in terms of osseointegration) has attracted a lot of interest because of its color that is similar to the one of natural teeth.This study will hence compare the long term performance of standard 4th generation dental implants made of titanium with a second generation zirconia dental implant. The study will evaluate the occurence of biological and technical complications; patient satisfaction and with the aesthetics of the tooth replacement over time.

Litifilimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody targeting blood dendritic cell antigen 2. It is an inhibitory receptor expressed on the surface of human plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDCs) and is being investigated for the potential treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of litifilimab compared with placebo in reducing skin disease activity measured by the CLA-IGA-R score \[Parts A\] and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) score \[Part B\] in participants with active SCLE and/or CCLE with or without systemic manifestations and refractory and/or intolerant to antimalarials. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of litifilimab in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity by CLA-IGA-R, CLASI-A; to evaluate additional efficacy parameters of litifilimab in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity; safety; tolerability; and immunogenicity of litifilimab \[Parts A and B\].

The primary objective of the NOA-18/IMPROVE CODEL trial is to show superiority of an initial CETEG treatment followed by partial brain radiotherapy (RT) plus PCV (RT-PCV) at progression over partial brain radiotherapy (RT) followed by procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy (RT-PCV) and best investigators choice (BIC) at progression for sustained qOS. An event with respect to a sustained qOS is then defined as a functional and/or cognitive deterioration on two consecutive study visits with an interval of 3 months, tolerating a deviation of at most 1 month. Assessments are done with 3-monthly MRI, assessment of the NANO (Neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology) scale, HRQoL, and KPS (Karnofsky performance status) and annually cognitive testing. Secondary objectives are evaluation and comparison of the two groups regarding secondary endpoints (short-term qOS, PFS, OS, complete and partial response rate). The trial is planned to be conducted at 21 NOA (Neurooncology Working Party of the German Cancer Society) study sites in Germany.

Tocilizumab is an additional investigational medicinal product (IMP), which may be used at the investigator's discretion when required in case of clinical presentation of cytokine release syndrome (CRS).

The main purpose of the SYNERGY-OUTCOMES study is to find out whether retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in people with high-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The study will enroll adults who have MASLD based on non-invasive tests (NITs), which indicate they are more likely to develop MALO. Participants will be randomly assigned within a Master Protocol to receive either retatrutide (N1T-MC-RT01), tirzepatide (N1T-MC-TZ01) or placebo. The trial plans to enroll about 4,500 adults and will run for approximately 224 weeks. Participants may have up to approximately 25 to 30 clinic visits throughout the study to monitor their health, complete study procedures, and assess liver function and disease progression. Once the study is complete, eligible participants may participate in an optional 2-year extension study, in which all participants will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide, even if they received placebo in the main study.

The prerequisite for participation in this observational study is the independent decision of the treating physician and patient to start an approved injectable or oral DMT for RMS as routine medical treatment. This decision must have been made prior to enrollment in this study. Cohort 1: The prospective observational period per patient in the core part will be up to approx. two years from the time of consent (2 years +2 months visit window). If a patient re-consents to the extension part, then the prospective extension observational period will be additional approx. two years, resulting in a total observational period (prospectively for the core and extension part \& retrospectively for the potential gap between core and extension part) of approx. 4 years (+ 2 month visit window). Cohort 2: The prospective observational period per patient will be up to approx. two years from the time of consent (2 years + 2 months visit window). The observational period will not be dictated by the protocol. The follow-up documentation will take place at a frequency defined as per investigator's discretion. The diagnostic or monitoring procedures are only those ordinarily applied to the therapeutic strategy and to routine clinical care, can be performed as telemedicine visits and will take place as per investigator's discretion.

Prospective, primary data will be collected from patients with sNfL outcomes in the context of switching to ofatumumab or continuing their current therapy. Data collection will cover a maximum period of 24 months. The observational period will not be dictated by the protocol. Baseline and follow-up visits will take place at a frequency defined as per Investigator´s discretion following clinical routine. The diagnostic or monitoring procedures are only those ordinarily applied to therapeutic strategy and routine clinical care. During the observation phase of the study, data will be collected according to standard of care as recommended by KKNMS (Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis in Germany). Eligible participants for the study are patients who have received treatment with category 1 DMTs and those who have included sNfL into their treatment decision-making process. These patients have the option to either continue their current DMT or switch to ofatumumab. According to local treatment guidelines, DMT category 1 include dimethylfumarate/diroximelfumarate, glatirameroids, Interferon beta and teriflunomide. The decision to switch to ofatumumab or to continue the current DMT category 1 therapy must be made by the treating physician independently of the decision to enroll the patient in the study.

This non-interventional study aims to provide information on real-world effectiveness, safety and tolerability, management of adverse events, QoL and patient compliance of patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence treated with ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) ± luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) with curative intent according to the current effective local summary of product characteristics. In order to put the results of patients treated with ribociclib into perspective, socio-economic data, data on QoL and patient compliance will also be collected from patients treated with abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (ET) ± LHRH as described in the current effective local summary of product characteristics. To understand reasons for treatment decision, and to analyze the clinical adoption of ribociclib + AI ± LHRH after EU approval over time, baseline data will be collected from cohorts of ribociclib + AI ± LHRH, abemaciclib + ET ± LHRH, and additionally from patients treated with ET monotherapy ± LHRH and analyzed cross-sectionally. The study is planned to be rolled out into a broad set of German and Austrian breast centers and gynecological practices to describe clinical routine in a representative subset of the local healthcare eco-system. It will gather insights into the potential benefits and risks associated with ribociclib + AI ± LHRH in the adjuvant treatment of HR+/HER2- eBC patients at high risk of recurrence. This knowledge will inform about clinical decision-making and contribute to improved patient outcomes in routine practice.

The individual observational period is planned to be up to 2 years, with assessments at baseline, one month after baseline and afterwards, every 3 months in the 1st and every 6 months in the 2nd year after dupilumab initiation, respectively.