Sindelfingen

CLL is the most frequent leukemia in industrialized countries. International guidelines agree on diagnosis and management of this disease. The clinical course of CLL is highly variable and can be predicted by clinical staging (according to Rai and Binet) as well as genetic, serum markers and risk models. This study is designed for a randomized comparison of two different, non-chemotherapeutic and fixed-duration modalities for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and addresses a high medical need, since high risk-CLL represents a so far incurable, aggressive cancer. The high risk-group of CLL patients can be identified by molecular characteristics, allowing the inclusion of a clearly described group of patients: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation and/or complex karyotype.TP53 defects are the strongest prognostic factors for non-response to chemotherapy. Patients harboring TP53 defects should be treated with chemotherapy-free regimens. Complex karyotype (CKT), defined as the presence of three or more chromosomal aberrations in two or more metaphases is associated with a poorer outcome in various hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In CLL, CKT is one of several well established adverse prognostic factors, comparable to 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation or unmutated IGHV status. Depending on age and prior exposure to chemotherapy, 10-30% of patients with CLL exhibit CKT. A broad body of evidence has suggested a predictive prognostic value of CKT. Despite considerable advances with chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of frontline as well as relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL, outcome of patients with CKT remains poor. To date, a randomized comparison to optimize the treatment of patients with high risk disease defined as either the presence of TP53 aberrations or CKT, by novel agents has not been performed. Patients with high risk CLL (TP53-defects and/or CKT) have a poor outcome with chemoimmunotherapy and do not benefit to the same extent from approved regimen such as continuous treatment of ibrutinib or 12 months treatment with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Monotherapy with BTK-inhibitor is less effective in those patients as compared with patients without high risk disease. Venetoclax combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab offers a highly effective fixed-duration treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile. The recent results of the CLL14 study define a new standard of a fixed 12-months treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax in previously untreated patients yielding a major benefit also for patients with high risk disease as compared to chemoimmunotherapy. However, high risk patients appear to progress earlier than low risk patients and the therapy is not clearly curative so far. Acalabrutinib is a second generation, selective BTK inhibitor which has shown promising overall response rates in patients with relapsed CLL or patients intolerant to ibrutinib. The development of acalabrutinib focussed on minimization of off-target activity. Results of a three-arm study investigating the combination of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus acalabrutinib alone versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (NCT02475681) showed a substantial improvement of PFS for the combination arm and the monotherapy versus the standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen. The addition of a BTK-inhibitor, such as acalabrutinib to obinutuzumab and venetoclax has the potential to result in a better outcome, because synergistic effects have been reported between BTK inhibitors and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or for BCL-2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Synergistic effects, which are expected to reduce early progressions or insufficient responses, are in particular important for this high risk population. The triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab (or rituximab) and venetoclax has been investigated in a phase 1 b- study and had a tolerable safety profile with minimal to no drug-drug interactions, results of a phase 2 trial studying the same combination showed that the triple combination was highly active with 78% undetectable MRD levels in the bone marrow . Currently, the GCLLSG conducts phase 2 studies, investigating a triple combination consisting of BTK- and Bcl2-inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies (CLL2GIVe: NCT02758665; CLL2BAAG: NCT03787264) and a large phase 3 trial with one experimental arm with a triple combination (CLL13, NCT02950051) but results are not yet published. Acalabrutinib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab is now being studied in a registrational phase 3 trial CL-311 (NCT03836261) against the current standard of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR), bendamustine/rituximab (BR) in patients without 17p-deletion or TP53-mutation. Acalabrutinib is indicated in Germany as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab for the treatment of adult patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Pumitamig versus Pembrolizumab in participants with previously untreated advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and PD-L1 ≥ 50%.

see brief summary

The GMALL registry serves the purpose of ALL research and quality assurance. The Registry collects data about diagnostics, treatment and outcome of Adult ALL Patients in the clinical routine, whether or not the patient is treated within a clinical trial.

Prostate water vapor therapy (Rezum) is an approved treatment procedure for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men caused by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Rezum is performed transurethrally by steam injections into the central or transition zone of the enlarged prostate. The 103°C hot steam is generated by a generator and injected into the prostate tissue via a disposable handpiece with a retractable needle. Approximately 1 injection is required per 10 ml of prostate tissue to achieve desobstruction. The single injection takes only 9 seconds. The thermal energy contained in the water vapor is able to develop evenly and freely in the intercellular space of the prostate by convection. This represents a unique technique in surgical desobstruction of the prostate. The steam condenses and releases the stored heat energy to the cell membranes, which then denature. As a result, the prostate tissue shrinks by about 30% in the first three months after the Rezum treatment. The shrinkage process therefore does not take place immediately, but with a time delay. The minimally invasive nature of the procedure results from the short surgical time, the potential of Rezum to preserve sexual function (both ejaculation and erection), and the possibility of performing Rezum even under local anesthesia or analgesia. Data on efficacy, durability of efficacy, safety/complications, and indication groups are still limited. "Real life" data are important to determine the role of Rezum water vapor therapy in the treatment of BPO and male LUTS. The aim of this study is to prospectively enroll and follow Rezum patients in a multicenter, German-language, web-based database. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinical-reported outcome measures/data (CROMs) on various subgroups of patients treated with Rezum as a routine clinical treatment option for BPO-related male LUTS will be recorded in terms of procedure efficacy, functional outcomes (e.g. sexual function) and surgical safety. Further aspects of interest are recovery from the procedure, patients' expectations towards Rezum treatment, patients' satisfaction with Rezum treatment, and impact of Rezum on quality of life.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a uniformly fatal disease if untreated. The combination of continuous oral Venetoclax (VEN) and 7 days of s.c. Azacitidine (AZA) per 28-day cycle has recently emerged as the new standard of care for AML patient who are ineligible for intensive induction therapy, and has been widely adopted in Germany. The VENAZA-5S pilot trial aims to reduce the reported hematological toxicity profile of this currently approved combination, while preserving efficacy, by modifying AZA administration to 5 days within each cycle. The hypothesis is that this modification will not interfere with the response rates achieved by the combination, but will rather improve tolerability and treatment adherence due to less neutropenic infections, less treatment interruptions and hospitalizations, and thus result in better quality of life and favorable long-term outcomes in elderly or comorbid AML patients. This single-arm pilot study is intended to generate first data on the efficacy and toxicity of 5 days AZA + VEN, which will be compared to a historical control cohort treated with the current standard of 7 days AZA + VEN.