Wolfsburg

Zolbetuximab (Vyloy), has received marketing approval in Japan. The study is considered a post marketing study in Japan.

One of the standard treatments for women with breast cancer is hormone therapy, but this treatment can cause hot flashes. Hormone replacement therapy, or HRT, is most often prescribed for hot flashes for women in menopause but cannot be given to women on hormone therapy for breast cancer. Fezolinetant, an alternative to HRT, treats hot flashes for women in menopause. As hot flashes happen in the same way for women on hormone therapy for breast cancer, fezolinetant could help these women. In this study, women on hormone therapy for breast cancer who have moderate to severe hot flashes will take part. They will either take fezolinetant or a placebo to treat their hot flashes. The placebo looks like fezolinetant but doesn't have any medicine in it. The main aim of this study is to confirm if women who take fezolinetant have fewer hot flashes that are less severe compared to women who take the placebo. Women 18 years or older seeking treatment for hot flashes. They can take part in the study if they have an average of 7 or more moderate to severe hot flashes each day. They are having hormone therapy for breast cancer from stage 0 (cancer cells that have not spread to nearby tissue) up to stage 3+ (the cancer has spread from the breast to the lymph nodes near the breast or the chest wall). The women will be assigned 1 of 2 study treatments (fezolinetant or placebo) by chance alone. Treatment will be double-blinded. That means that the women in the study and the study doctors will not know who takes which of the study treatments (fezolinetant or placebo). Women who take part in the study will take 1 tablet every day for 52 weeks (1 year). Each woman will be given an electronic handheld device with an app to track their hot flashes on a daily basis. Some women may be able to use the app on their own smartphone. They will also use another device to answer questions about how hot flashes affect their daily life. During the study, the women will visit their study clinic about every 4 weeks for a health check. The last clinic visit will be 3 weeks after the women take their last tablet of study treatment (fezolinetant or placebo). After this visit the women will be called twice to check their health. The women will be in the study for about 2 years.

Objectives and Endpoints Primary Objective: To establish one of three study arms, R-CHOP/R-DHAP followed by ASCT (control arm A), R-CHOP+ibrutinib /R-DHAP followed by ASCT and ibrutinib maintenance experimental arm A+I), and R-CHOP+ibrutinib /R-DHAP followed by ibrutinib maintenance experimental arm I) as future standard based on the comparison of the investigator-assessed failure-free survival (FFS). Secondary Objectives: * To compare the efficacy of the three treatment arms in terms of secondary efficacy endpoints * To determine the safety and tolerability of ibrutinib during induction immuno-chemotherapy and during maintenance and to compare the safety profile of the three treatment arms in terms of secondary toxicity endpoints Primary Endpoint: FFS defined as time from start of treatment to stable disease at end of immuno-chemotherapy, progressive disease, or death from any cause. Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: * Overall survival (OS) * Progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization, from end of induction immuno-chemotherapy in patients with CR or PR at end of induction immuno-chemotherapy, and from the staging 6 weeks after end of induction assessment (at month 6) * Overall response and complete remission rates at midterm, at end of induction, 3 months after end of induction immunochemotherapy (at month 6) * PR to CR conversion rate during follow-up after end of induction immuno-chemotherapy Secondary Toxicity Endpoints: * Rates of AEs, SAEs, and SUSARs by CTC grade (Version 4.03) during induction immuno-chemotherapy and during periods of follow-up after response to immune-chemotherapy * Cumulative incidence rates of SPMs Exploratory Objectives: * To compare feasibility of ASCT in arm A+I vs. arm A * To compare minimal residual disease status between the three treatment groups * To determine the impact of ibrutinib during induction immuno-chemotherapy and during maintenance therapy on the minimal residual disease status * To determine the prognostic value of minimal residual disease status * To determine the prognostic value of positron emission tomography with fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose * To determine clinical and biological prognostic and predictive factors * To determine the role of total body irradiation (TBI) in ASCT conditioning Exploratory Endpoints: * Rate of successful stem cell mobilisations (success: separation of at least 2x2x10(6) CD34-positive cells, including a back-up) * Rate of molecular remissions (MRD-negative patients) at midterm, at end of induction immuno-chemotherapy, and at staging time-points during follow-up in patients with remission after end of induction immuno-chemotherapy * Time to molecular remission from start of therapy * Time to molecular relapse for patients in clinical and molecular remission after end of induction immunochemotherapy * RD in FDG-PET negative or positive patients after induction and ASCT Exploratory objectives may be evaluated only in a subset of patients according to local standards and resources.

Randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled, multicenter comparative study on the treatment of acute head lice infestation in children with 2 dimeticone preparations with different application times and compositions: Dimet 5® (100% dimeticone) versus Hedrin® Once Liquid Gel (4% dimeticone + nerolidol) with treatment success assessment via freedom from infestation of live head lice at final examination at V2, i.e. day 19 after first treatment.

The primary aim of this trial is to ascertain whether or not systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LNE) does have a significant impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) FIGO Stages I or II and high risk of recurrence. Secondary aims will be to evaluate the effect of LNE on disease free survival (DFS) and quality of life, as well as the complications and side effects of LNE and the number of resected lymphnodes. 640 patients with histologically confirmed EC with high risk of recurrence (stage pT1b - pT2, all histological subtypes; pT1a, G3 endometrioid or serous or clear cell EC or carcinosarcomas) will be randomized. In Arm A, a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and in case of serous or clear cell EC additionally an omentectomy will be performed. In arm B in addition a systematic pelvic and para-aortic LNE up to the level of the left renal vein will be performed.

The GMALL registry serves the purpose of ALL research and quality assurance. The Registry collects data about diagnostics, treatment and outcome of Adult ALL Patients in the clinical routine, whether or not the patient is treated within a clinical trial.

The following patients can be included in this registry: Children and adults with * Medulloblastoma (MB) * Ependymoma * Pineal Tumours * Chroroid plexus tumours Objectives of this registry: To prospectively evaluate the clinical courses of patients with the eligible brain tumours, considering neuroradiological, pathological, and molecular / biological characteristics of the tumour and individual standard treatment data. To collect biological specimens (tumour, CSF, peripheral blood) or their data to perform biological studies on * disease aetiology * molecular / biological risk factors influencing treatment response and survival * potential targets for drug treatment in future patients To assess the use of systems for quality assurance during diagnosis and treatment of brain tumours. To assess long-term follow-up, quality of survival, neuropsychology, and other patient-centred research in these very rare tumour subtypes in the context of the registry or in cooperation with external collaborators.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare hematologic disorder that can lead to a greater risk of bleeding or a prolonged bleeding time due to an autoimmune-mediated deficiency of platelets. In recent years, new treatment options for patients with immune thrombocytopenia have emerged. The results of published clinical studies on ITP can only be used for broad patient care to a limited extent, as they are designed for a patient population with clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Real world data collected from this registry will help to better understand the diagnosis and therapy of ITP patients in everyday treatment and to more effectively direct individual patients to optimal therapy, thus improving their outcomes. By collecting biospecimens, this project will contribute new knowledge to the study of ITP through standardized, systematic, and high-quality collection and storage of patient samples and associated data. The registry collects clinical data from patients diagnosed with ITP at defined points in the course of the disease. The Data collection includes a range of clinical measures, disease-related factors, treatment/treatment course and outcomes, complications during treatment and Qol, fatigue scoring and survival data (up to 5 years). The data are collected prospectively. In addition, patients can be included retrospectively up to 12 months after the initial diagnosis if continuous documentation can be provided at the treatment centre. In both cases, a written declaration of consent is obligatory.

Femara (letrozole) is an extensively investigated, marketed aromatase inhibitor (AI) widely used as treatment in the maintenance phase of estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, as it inhibit the synthesis of estrogens. Estrogen is a well known driver of cancer growth in ER-positive tumors and a high percentage of the epithelial ovarian cancers express ER as well. Of which low grade ovarian cancers demonstrates the highest level of expression, supporting our strategy of a sub-group analysis (LOGOS). Therefore, letrozole in this study be investigated prospectively and evaluated as maintenance therapy after standard surgical and chemotherapy treatment in comparison to placebo (which is the current standard maintenance treatment) in subjects with primary, ER-positive low or high grade serous or endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer) of FIGO Stage II-IV, whose cancer has not progressed by the end of the platinum-based chemotherapy. The objectives are to evaluate the letrozole maintenance treatment compared to placebo in terms of * progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) * overall survival (OS) * quality-adjusted progression free survival (QAPFS) * time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) * quality-adjusted time without symptoms of toxicity (Q-TWiST) * health related quality of life (QoL) assessed by EQ-5D-5L, FACT-ES and FACT-O questionnaires Methods: 540 for this study eligible subjects are 1:1 allocated in this randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multi-centre study to either the test (letrozole) or control (placebo) group. The maximum maintenance treatment duration is 5 years or until symptoms of toxicity or progression of underlying disease. Health and health-related quality of life will continuously be assessed at study entry and during routine recalls which are scheduled every 12 weeks for the first 2 years, followed by every 24 weeks for the next 3 years. Procedures performed to assess the participants' health are the same as are performed during the regular routine ovarian cancer follow-up visits: blood tests, physical as well as gynaecological examinations and may include imaging. In addition, the participants are asked to complete during the study quality of life (QoL) specific questionnaires and wear an activity tracker for one week just before the scheduled visits. These assessments will be used for the evaluation of letrozole's efficacy and burden in comparison to the standard maintenance treatment. Survival follow-up data after the mainentance treatment duration of 5 years (study end) are obtained for up to another 7 years.

This prospective non-interventional study is intended to generate new data and insights into first-line (1L) treatment of newly diagnosed advanced high-grade epithelial Ovarian cancer (OC) in Germany relevant for patients, physicians and payers. It will capture the influence of 1L Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance treatment (MTX) on medical routine in Germany, especially on: * outcome of the 3-steps 1L treatment phase (including surgery, Chemotherapy (CTX) and MTX) including the potential of patients with primary advanced OC to be cured, * patient's follow-up (FU) during and after MTX therapy, * patient-reported outcomes (PROs), experiences and needs, * physician's experience, * BRCA/HRD and genomic scar testing behavior at diagnosis/during 1L therapy, * patient selection for different 1L systemic treatment approaches, * use and safety of drugs, * treatment sequence in case of recurrence