Stockton On Tees

STAMPEDE2 is a clinical trial comparing two new treatments with standard of care in people with prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body and is responsive to hormone therapy. People from all backgrounds and ethnicities are encouraged to take part and multiple hospitals across the UK are involved. University College London is running the trial. Each comparison within the trial has its own control arm where people get the best standard of care (Arm A) versus a research arm where a new treatment is added to standard of care. Participants are allocated to an arm by a computerised system with a 50% chance of getting the research treatment. Comparison S: Arm A versus Arm S (Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR)) - Tests whether giving targeted doses of radiotherapy (SABR) to parts of the body where the cancer has spread slows the spread of the cancer and improves survival. 2476 people will be in this comparison. Comparison P: Arm A versus Arm P (PSMA-Lutetium (177Lu-PSMA-617)) - Tests whether giving a radioactive material (177Lu-PSMA-617) that targets prostate cancer cells slows the spread of the cancer and improves survival. 1756 people will be in this comparison. All participants will be followed up with scans and tests to monitor their cancer. Doctors will check for any side effects from the treatments. Treatments will be stopped if side effects are serious, or people no longer wish to take the treatments.

This study will be done to see if ziltivekimab can be used to treat people living with heart failure and inflammation. Participants will either get ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will get study medicine for once-monthly injections either in a pre-filled syringe to inject the study medicine into a skinfold or a pen-injector to inject the study medicine into flat skin. The study is expected to last for up to 4 years. Participants will have up to 20 clinic visits. Participants will have to use a study app on their phone to record and share information about all their injections of study medicine and to fill in questionnaires.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate humoral immunogenicity after 2 doses of mRNA-1018-H5, and to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of mRNA-1018-H5 in adults ≥18 years of age.

The purpose of this clinical study is to learn about the safety and effects of the study medicine to help adults with obesity or overweight and type 2 diabetes lose weight. Being overweight or obese means carrying too much body weight. Type 2 diabetes is a condition where there is too much sugar in the blood. The study medicine is given by a shot under the skin in the belly area. The participants will be trained to do this at home once every week. About 660 out of 1000 adults will also receive the study medicine and about 330 out of 1000 adults will receive placebo. A placebo does not have any medicine in it but looks just like the medicine being studied. The investigators will compare the experiences of people receiving the study medicine to those of the people who do not. This will help us assess if the study medicine is safe and effective. People will take part in this study for about 21 months. During this time, they will have about 14 study visits at the site and 5 over the phone.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of muvalaplin in reducing cardiovascular risk in participants with high lipoprotein(a) who have cardiovascular disease or are at risk of a heart attack or stroke.

Guidelines for node marking: Sites are advised to follow the same standards used in the ongoing ATNEC breast cancer trial. At least three nodes should be removed to allow adequate assessment of nodal tumour burden. Timing: The node may be marked at the time of needle biopsy or at a separate visit. Technique: Node may be marked using any technique e.g. clip or coil (with or without skin mark), black dye, magnetic seeds or reflector. Black dye node marking: Inject 0.2-0.4 ml of black dye into the cortex of the node Do not inject around the node or into the needle tract If the marked node is not found or if multiple black nodes are identified the surgeon may stop once a total of four nodes have been removed Single vs multiple node marking: It is not necessary to mark more than one node, even if multiple nodes are biopsied or appear malignant. The most abnormal-appearing node should be marked.

Background: The presence of cancer in the axillary lymph nodes on needle biopsy in patients with early stage breast cancer before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been the determinant of the need for axillary treatment (in the form of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART)) after completion of NACT. Treatment to the axilla damages lymphatic drainage from the arm and patients can subsequently develop lymphoedema, restricted shoulder movement, pain, numbness, and other sensory problems. As more effective chemotherapy is now available that results in complete eradication of cancer in the axilla in around 40 to 70% of patients, extensive axillary treatment might no longer be necessary in patients with no evidence of residual nodal disease. Aim: To assess whether, omitting further axillary treatment (ALND and ART) for patients with early stage breast cancer and axillary nodal metastases on needle biopsy, who after NACT have no residual cancer in the lymph nodes on sentinel node biopsy, is non-inferior to axillary treatment in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and results in reduced risk of lymphoedema at 5 years. Methods: Study design: A pragmatic, phase 3, open, randomised, multicentre trial and embedded economic evaluation in which participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Study population: T1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients aged 18 years or older, with needle biopsy proven nodal metastases, who after NACT have no residual cancer in the lymph nodes on dual tracer sentinel node biopsy and removal of at least 3 lymph nodes (sentinel nodes and marked involved node). Intervention: All participants will receive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatment, endocrine therapy and radiotherapy to breast or chest wall, if indicated according to local guidelines. Patients in the intervention group will not receive further axillary treatment (ALND or ART), whereas those receiving standard care will receive axillary treatment (ALND or ART) as per local guidelines. Follow-up is annually for at least 5 years. Outcomes: The co-primary outcomes are disease free survival(DFS) and self-reported lymphoedema defined as 'yes' to the two questions participants will be asked - 'arm heaviness during the past year' and 'arm swelling now' from the Lymphoedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire at 5 years. Secondary outcomes: arm function assessed by the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) questionnaire; health related quality of life assessed using euroqol EQ-5D-5L; axillary recurrence free interval (ARFI); local recurrence; regional (nodal) recurrence; distant metastasis; overall survival; contralateral breast cancer; non-breast malignancy; costs; quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness. Sample size: A sample size of 1900 patients would have the ability to demonstrate a 3.5% non-inferiority margin with a 5% 1-sided significance level and 85% power, allowing for 7% non-collection of primary outcome data assuming a 90% 5-year disease free survival rate in the control arm. It would also be able to detect at least a 5% difference in proportion of patients with lymphoedema with 90% power, a 5% 2-sided significance level and allowing for 25% non-collection of primary outcome data over 5 years. Analysis plan: All analyses will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis to preserve randomisation, avoid bias from exclusions and preserve statistical power. Time to event outcomes, including disease free survival and axillary recurrence free interval, will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using Cox proportional hazards models. The proportion of patients experiencing lymphoedema at 5 years will be compared across trial arms using a chi-squared test and a logistic regression model used to adjust for stratification variables. Arm morbidity and health related quality of life will be scored using the appropriate manuals and assessed using a longitudinal mixed model regression analysis if model assumptions valid or a standardised area-under-the-curve analysis. For economic evaluation, incremental cost per QALY gained at 5 years will be estimated. Timelines for delivery: Total project duration is 120 months based on 6 months for set up; 60 months recruitment period (including an 18 months internal pilot phase); and 54 months for follow up, analysis, writing up and dissemination.

Bowel cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death in the UK with 16000 people dying per year. Although the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) detects cancers at an earlier stage only 10% of all cancers are detected through screening. Currently, the only criteria for screening is age and no account is taken of other known risk factors such as smoking, alcohol, family history or obesity. Stool FIT (a new stool test which detects blood that can't be seen with the naked eye) will be introduced into the English BCSP, but there is poor evidence for its use in patients presenting with symptoms. There is also emerging data that there may be differences in the gut bacteria of people with and without cancer or pre cancerous bowel polyps (adenomas). This will be a national multi-centre study over 5-years. 10000 Patients undergoing colonoscopy as part of BCSP or due to symptoms will be recruited. Patients will be asked to fill in a health questionnaire, have their height, weight, waist circumference measured. Patients will also receive blood tests, stool tests or saliva tests depending on the indication for their colonoscopy. The results of the colonoscopy and any samples taken will be collated. Patients will receive a patient experience questionnaire or food frequency questionnaire. A further 10,000 patients from the North of England will be consented to be contacted for future studies with some of the information above collected. The aim of this study is to develop a risk prediction model to help determine which patients are at highest risk of having adenomas or bowel cancer. The investigators will also explore the significance of the gut bacteria composition in patients with adenomas or cancer to help inform this risk model. Additionally the investigators will develop a large platform of patients who consent to be contacted for future research.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the combination of lasofoxifene and abemaciclib compared to fulvestrant and abemaciclib for the treatment of pre- and postmenopausal women and men who have previously received ribociclib or palbociclib-based treatment and have locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer with an estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation. The main question the study aims to answer is: • To compare the efficacy of the combination of lasofoxifene and abemaciclib with that of fulvestrant and abemaciclib Participants will receive either receive 5 mg/d of oral lasofoxifene plus oral abemaciclib 150 mg twice a day or the combination of fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscular (IM) on Days 1, 15, and 29 and then once monthly thereafter plus oral abemaciclib 150 mg twice a day.

UK data suggests that current treatment for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) results in unacceptably high rates of cIAI relapse and extra-abdominal infection. As a guiding rule, shorter antibiotic durations are important to combat antimicrobial resistance, but this is not true when these shorter courses need repeating and result in more days in hospital. Optimal care for patients should be our primary concern. The EXTEND trial aims to find out whether a fixed extended duration of 28 days of antibiotics is superior to the current standard duration (typically 7-18 days) based on clinical outcomes and quality of life assessed over 180 days of follow up. Cost effectiveness will also be determined. A target of 1166 patients will be recruited from ICUs and hospital in-patient wards across approximately 30 NHS trust hospitals. Only patients that are able provide consent (or those with a consultee able to confirm whether the patient would wish to be included in the study) can take part in the trial. They will receive antibiotics as prescribed by their treating clinician, but the duration of treatment will be determined by randomisation. Patients will have equal chance of randomisation to the standard care arm, in which the antibiotic duration will be determined by the treating clinician, or the intervention arm, a fixed duration of 28 days treatment. Patients (or a personal consultee) will complete a quality of life questionnaire at baseline and 30, 60 and 180 days after randomisation. At follow-up timepoints they will also complete questionnaires on antibiotic use and health care resource use. Hospital notes will be used to collect data on inpatient admissions, relapse and further infections. The study is Sponsored by the University of Leeds