Telford

This study will include participants who are suffering from low blood sugar related symptoms (hypoglycemia) due to over-production of hormones (e.g. insulin or similar substances) by certain non-removable tumors that cannot be treated satisfactorily with available treatment. Every study participant will receive ersodetug doses weekly for 8 weeks alongside their usual treatments for hypoglycemia at a dose of 9 mg/kg. The study is divided into 3 periods: Screening (up to 4 weeks), Treatment (8 weeks) and either End of Study Follow-up (approximately up to 20 weeks after the last dose) or optional Open Label Extension (OLE) phase (up to 3 years). This study is being conducted at approximately 10-15 study sites in approximately 5 countries. The study will enroll approximately 16 participants, all with a diagnosis of tumor HI (insulin- or IGF producing tumors).

This is a Phase II, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inobrodib in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (InoPd) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients must be 18 years or older and be refractory to least one proteosome inhibitor (PI), one anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and pomalidomide. Patients must also be previously treated with an approved bispecific T-cell engager \[TCE\]. Approximately 100 patients will be treated with 20 mg of inobrodib administered orally twice daily (b.i.d.) 4 days on / 3 days off for each 28-day cycle. Pomalidomide and dexamethasone will be administered as per standard of care (SoC), i.e., with a starting dose of 4 mg orally once daily on Day 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle for pomalidomide, and 40 mg orally once daily on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 for each 28-day cycle for dexamethasone. Study treatment should be continued until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy, unacceptable toxicity or the patient meets any criteria for withdrawal from the study. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of InoPd in terms of objective response rate (ORR) based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC).

RESOLVE is a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, open-label study designed to evaluate in real-world conditions the comparative effectiveness of two default dialysate sodium concentrations. Dialysis sites will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to a default dialysate sodium concentration of 137mmol/l or 140mmol/l. 'Default' is defined as the use of the allocated dialysate sodium for ≥ 90% of delivered dialysis sessions in the unit. All other care will be according to standard local practices as determined by the site. Outcomes will be assessed on individual patients dialysing at those sites. Sites will be asked to consent to participation while waiver or opt-out consent will be sought for individual patients. It is anticipated that site accrual will occur over 5-7 years with average study duration expected to be approximately 2-5 years. The actual length of the study will be end-point determined.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of belzutifan (MK-6482) plus fulvestrant compared to everolimus plus endocrine therapy (ET) (investigator's choice of fulvestrant or exemestane) in adults with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) unresectable metastatic breast cancer. There is no formal hypothesis testing in this study.

The primary objectives of the study are: 1. Confirm the presence of established genetic, epigenetic and microbiome based biomarker signatures associated with CRC and high-risk adenoma (defined as \>10mm in diameter or the presence of high-grade dysplasia) in colorectal urgent suspected cancer referrals, who are triaged for colonoscopy. 2. To expand and refine the genomic, epigenetic and microbiome biomarker signature profiles associated with colorectal cancer and high-risk adenoma to identify rarer biomarkers in addition to those previously established. 3. To generate indicative performance metrics, including an assessment of discriminatory power, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values for the clinical application of Oricol™ multiomics assay. The Secondary Objectives of the study are: 1\. To assess the health economics of delivering a diagnostic service to patients referred to the urgent suspected cancer (USC) pathway via a Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) in comparison to the current delivery mechanisms through the Two-Week Wait (TWW) pathway.