Corewell Health Lakeland Hospitals - Niles Hospital

Researchers are studying how certain factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect whether patients with malignant solid tumors develop mild or serious side effects from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. This observational study aims to develop and validate a model that predicts severe immune-related side effects during the first year of immunotherapy, while also assessing quality of life and adverse events over 12 months. The study is sponsored by the SWOG Cancer Research Network and includes translational medicine goals such as evaluating cytokine levels as predictors and establishing a tissue and blood sample repository. Participants will provide a tissue sample at the start of their routine cancer treatment and complete questionnaires at multiple time points at treatment start, and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. They may also provide optional blood samples during the study. This design allows researchers to monitor immune-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes over time. During the study, participants will complete various questionnaires to report their quality of life, cognitive function, and side effects. Blood and tissue samples will be analyzed to explore predictive markers of toxicity. Researchers will track the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and assess changes in patient-reported outcomes. The study includes ongoing monitoring and data collection, with participation lasting approximately one year from treatment start.

Researchers are studying adolescent and young adult AYA cancer survivors who had Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma to understand how social and genetic factors affect their health outcomes after treatment. These survivors face unique biological, clinical, psychological, and social challenges that may influence their risks for illness and early death compared to older or childhood cancer patients. The study aims to identify conditions increasing these risks and to better meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors. Participants will complete questionnaires about their quality of life and provide blood samples at the start of the study and again at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. This observational study collects health and treatment information without administering any medical treatments. The study assesses social-environmental risks, individual resilience factors, and gene expression changes to understand their impact on survival and quality of life. Participants will be asked to fill out health-related questionnaires and provide blood samples multiple times over two years. Researchers will measure disease-free survival, overall survival, comorbidities, and quality of life during this period. The study involves ongoing monitoring through questionnaires and blood tests to gather detailed data on how social and genetic factors influence long-term outcomes for AYA lymphoma survivors.

This research aims to gather health information from infants, children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with cancer to improve treatment and ongoing care. It maintains a Childhood Cancer Registry and uses clinical and biological data to identify eligibility for Childrens Oncology Group therapeutic trials. The study also develops a biorepository of biospecimens and clinical data for current and future research, including tumor and host DNA samples, and allows for future contact regarding additional research studies. Participants are assigned to one of two observational protocols. In the Project Every Child Protocol, medical data is reviewed to create a cancer registry, and biospecimens such as tissue, blood, bone marrow, plasma, serum, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine are collected. In the Project AYA Protocol, biospecimens are collected similarly. These samples are gathered at diagnosis, progression, recurrence, or post-mortem where applicable. During the study, participants undergo medical chart reviews and biospecimen collections. Researchers measure the number of patients consenting to biobanking as a primary outcome. Clinical data including diagnosis, staging, treatment summaries, and outcomes are recorded. The study involves ongoing data collection over time to support future research and screening for trial eligibility, with participation lasting as long as data and samples continue to be collected.

This research aims to evaluate how well amivantamab given by subcutaneous injection works in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer that has extra copies of the MET gene. This phase II Expanded Lung-MAP treatment trial focuses on patients with MET amplification-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The goal is to see if amivantamab-SC can reduce tumor growth or spread by targeting the extra MET gene copies in these tumors. Participants receive amivantamab subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent 28-day cycles as long as the disease does not progress or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the trial, patients have regular CT or MRI scans and blood samples taken to monitor treatment effects and disease status. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 3 years to assess long-term outcomes. During the study, researchers evaluate how many patients respond to the treatment, how long responses last, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the frequency and severity of side effects. Blood samples are collected before treatment, during therapy, and at disease progression to study tumor DNA and build a tissue and blood repository. Safety labs, physical exams, and performance status assessments are also conducted. The total participation can last up to 3 years including follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of pembrolizumab immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy for patients with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has been completely removed by surgery. This phase III trial aims to compare disease-free survival and overall survival among different treatment approaches, including chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. The study also assesses quality of life and adverse event rates in these patient groups. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group receives only chemotherapy with observation afterward. The other two groups receive chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. Chemotherapy involves one of four platinum doublet regimens administered every 21 days for four cycles, depending on the physicians choice. Pembrolizumab is given intravenously over 25-40 minutes, either after chemotherapy or alongside it, repeated every 21 days or every 6 weeks for multiple cycles. Patients also undergo heart ultrasound, MRI, CT scans, and blood sample collections as part of the study. During the trial, participants have regular medical assessments including imaging and blood tests to monitor their health. Follow-up visits occur 6 weeks after treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for years 2-4, and annually up to 10 years from randomization. Researchers measure disease-free survival as the main outcome, tracking the time until cancer recurrence or death. They also evaluate overall survival, side effects, drug tolerability, and patient-reported quality of life over time.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab vedotin can provide benefits for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or grade 3b follicular lymphoma that has returned or not responded to treatment. This study focuses on patients who have already received chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by CAR T-cell therapy. The goal is to determine if adding these drugs after previous treatments may better control or shrink the cancer. Participants first receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by one of three CAR T-cell therapies given by infusion tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel. After this, participants are randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving mosunetuzumab alone, polatuzumab vedotin alone, both drugs together, or observation without further drug treatment. Those in the observation group who experience disease progression within 12 months may switch to receive both drugs. Throughout the study, patients undergo PET-CT or CT scans and provide blood and tissue samples for research. Participants will be monitored regularly with imaging scans and laboratory tests to assess disease status and treatment effects. Researchers will measure progression-free survival, overall survival, remission rates, and treatment side effects up to two years. The study also includes collecting and banking tissue samples and PET-CT images for future research. The total length of involvement depends on individual timelines but includes treatment and follow-up periods extending up to two years or more.

Researchers are investigating targeted therapies directed by genetic testing for patients with locally advanced or advanced solid tumors that have spread or progressed after standard treatments. This Phase 2 screening trial, called ComboMATCH, aims to match patients to specific combination treatments based on genetic mutations found in their tumor cells. The study seeks to improve treatment planning by using genetic information to guide therapy choices. Patients undergo tumor genetic screening using previously collected samples or a new biopsy if eligible and aged 18 or older. Based on their tumors genetic profile, patients are assigned to one of multiple treatment subprotocols involving different drug combinations. Treatments include oral, intravenous, and intramuscular drugs such as selumetinib, olaparib, fulvestrant, binimetinib, and others. Treatment cycles generally repeat every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo biopsies, blood collection, imaging scans CT, MRI, PET, echocardiograms, and bone marrow procedures as part of the study. Throughout the trial, participants have regular assessments including tumor biopsies, blood draws, imaging tests, and heart function monitoring. These evaluations occur during screening, treatment, and follow-up periods. Researchers measure patient enrollment, assignment to treatment arms, and treatment outcomes over up to 8 years. Safety is monitored via clinical evaluations and diagnostic tests. This comprehensive approach aims to evaluate responses to targeted therapies guided by tumor genetics for advanced solid tumors.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who are considered frail or intermediate-fit and who are not candidates for stem cell transplant. This phase III trial compares three different three-drug induction regimens followed by either single or double drug maintenance therapies. The study aims to find which drug combination best controls the cancer and improves patient outcomes while considering patients age, other health conditions, and physical function. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms. In Arm 1, patients receive bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with bortezomib given subcutaneously and the others taken orally for up to 9 cycles, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 2 involves daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj given subcutaneously, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 3 includes the same induction as Arm 2, but maintenance therapy combines daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj and lenalidomide. Each cycle lasts 28 days, and treatment continues without disease progression or unacceptable side effects. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers monitor progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, minimal residual disease status, and patient-reported symptoms and health status. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for two years, and then annually for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and safety.

This trial studies patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia T-ALL or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma T-LBL. It evaluates the safety, side effects, best dose, and effectiveness of OBI-3424, a chemotherapy drug designed to stop cancer cell growth by killing cells or preventing their division or spread. The study also explores how OBI-3424 affects disease remission and survival outcomes. Patients receive OBI-3424 intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment can continue for up to 17 cycles if the disease does not progress and side effects remain acceptable. Those who do not show partial remission by the fourth cycle may be removed unless the investigator finds them clinically benefiting. The study includes blood tests, cerebrospinal fluid collection, bone marrow biopsy, and possible CT scans throughout treatment. Participants undergo screening with blood tests and provide samples during treatment. They are monitored regularly with bone marrow samples and imaging to assess disease status and treatment response. Follow-up visits occur monthly for one year, then every two months for another year, every three months for a third year, and every six months for up to five years from registration. Researchers measure the maximum tolerated dose, response rates, side effects, survival, and minimal residual disease among other outcomes.

Researchers are studying colorectal cancer CRC in participants aged 45 to 70 who have 1 to 2 non-advanced adenomas, which are small colon polyps without high-risk features. The trial compares two surveillance colonoscopy schedules one group receives colonoscopy at 5 and 10 years after polyp detection, while the other group has colonoscopy only at 10 years. This study aims to provide randomized data to guide optimal timing for follow-up colonoscopies to help reduce CRC incidence and improve clinical practices. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups the first group undergoes surveillance colonoscopy at both 5 and 10 years following their qualifying colonoscopy, and the second group undergoes colonoscopy at 10 years only. All colonoscopies, including any unscheduled ones, follow current quality guidelines and institutional preparation standards. The qualifying colonoscopy must have been complete and performed within 4 years before randomization, with all polyps fully removed. During the study, participants will undergo colonoscopies according to their assigned schedules. Researchers will monitor the incidence of colorectal cancer over 10 years as the primary outcome. Participants must be able to understand English or Spanish to complete required procedures. The study may last up to several decades, with ongoing monitoring to assess long-term cancer incidence and the effectiveness of different surveillance intervals.