NYU Long Island Hospital

This research aims to gather health information from infants, children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with cancer to improve treatment and ongoing care. It maintains a Childhood Cancer Registry and uses clinical and biological data to identify eligibility for Childrens Oncology Group therapeutic trials. The study also develops a biorepository of biospecimens and clinical data for current and future research, including tumor and host DNA samples, and allows for future contact regarding additional research studies. Participants are assigned to one of two observational protocols. In the Project Every Child Protocol, medical data is reviewed to create a cancer registry, and biospecimens such as tissue, blood, bone marrow, plasma, serum, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine are collected. In the Project AYA Protocol, biospecimens are collected similarly. These samples are gathered at diagnosis, progression, recurrence, or post-mortem where applicable. During the study, participants undergo medical chart reviews and biospecimen collections. Researchers measure the number of patients consenting to biobanking as a primary outcome. Clinical data including diagnosis, staging, treatment summaries, and outcomes are recorded. The study involves ongoing data collection over time to support future research and screening for trial eligibility, with participation lasting as long as data and samples continue to be collected.

Pressure injuries, also known as pressure ulcers, affect over 2.5 million people in the United States and range from intact skin to severe wounds with deep tissue loss. This study focuses on patients with stage 2, 3, and 4 pressure injuries and aims to compare the standard care treatment recommended by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel to a new treatment using Altrazealae Transforming Powder Dressing, a wound hydrogel device. The study evaluates whether dressing changes can be reduced and compares wound healing, complications, pain, quality of life, and costs between the two treatments. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving standard wound dressings such as hydrocolloid, hydrogel, foam, or negative pressure therapy, and the other receiving the Altrazealae Transforming Powder Dressing, which conforms to the wound and protects it from bacteria. Altrazealae can remain on the wound for up to 30 days and is topped off as needed during visits. Both groups receive treatments over 12 consecutive weeks, with the option to end earlier if the wound heals. During the study, participants will attend up to 12 visits over 12 weeks for wound evaluations including cleaning, photographs, and measurements. They will also complete pain assessments, quality of life surveys, and questionnaires about wound care and offloading device use. Researchers will monitor dressing changes, healing progress, complications, pain, and quality of life. At study end, participants will complete a satisfaction survey about the wound dressing experience.

Researchers are comparing two treatments for children and young adults aged 2 to 21 with newly diagnosed or untreated low-grade glioma LGG that does not have a BRAFV600E mutation or neurofibromatosis type 1 NF1. The study aims to find out if selumetinib, a drug that blocks enzymes needed for tumor cell growth, works as well as the standard chemotherapy treatment with carboplatin and vincristine CV. It also evaluates which treatment better improves quality of life and patient outcomes. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives vincristine intravenously on specific days along with carboplatin intravenously on scheduled days, followed by maintenance cycles every 42 days for up to 8 cycles. The other group takes selumetinib orally twice daily in 28-day cycles for up to 27 cycles. Throughout the trial, patients undergo blood collection, MRI scans, and in the selumetinib group, echocardiography at baseline. Treatments continue unless there is disease progression or unacceptable side effects. During participation, patients have various assessments including tumor imaging, blood tests, and evaluations of vision and motor function. Quality of life and cognitive, social, emotional, and behavioral functions are also measured. After treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for years 2 and 3, and then annually up to 10 years. The main outcome measured is event-free survival over this period.

This trial studies newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in participants who are not candidates for stem cell transplant. It compares the effects of two drug combinations teclistamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide Tec-DR, and talquetamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide Tal-DR, against the standard treatment of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone DRd. The goal is to assess how these combinations affect disease progression and treatment response. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either Tec-DR, Tal-DR, or DRd. Teclistamab and talquetamab are given as subcutaneous injections, daratumumab is given subcutaneously, lenalidomide is taken orally, and dexamethasone can be given orally or intravenously. Treatments are administered according to the study protocol over an extended period, with follow-up lasting up to nine years to monitor outcomes. During the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including disease progression monitoring, minimal residual disease status at 12 months, and assessments of response levels. Researchers also track survival, adverse events, laboratory and vital sign changes, quality of life, and drug concentrations. The study involves multiple visits for treatment and assessment to carefully evaluate the long-term impact of these drug combinations on patient health and disease control.

Researchers are investigating targeted therapies directed by genetic testing for patients with locally advanced or advanced solid tumors that have spread or progressed after standard treatments. This Phase 2 screening trial, called ComboMATCH, aims to match patients to specific combination treatments based on genetic mutations found in their tumor cells. The study seeks to improve treatment planning by using genetic information to guide therapy choices. Patients undergo tumor genetic screening using previously collected samples or a new biopsy if eligible and aged 18 or older. Based on their tumors genetic profile, patients are assigned to one of multiple treatment subprotocols involving different drug combinations. Treatments include oral, intravenous, and intramuscular drugs such as selumetinib, olaparib, fulvestrant, binimetinib, and others. Treatment cycles generally repeat every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo biopsies, blood collection, imaging scans CT, MRI, PET, echocardiograms, and bone marrow procedures as part of the study. Throughout the trial, participants have regular assessments including tumor biopsies, blood draws, imaging tests, and heart function monitoring. These evaluations occur during screening, treatment, and follow-up periods. Researchers measure patient enrollment, assignment to treatment arms, and treatment outcomes over up to 8 years. Safety is monitored via clinical evaluations and diagnostic tests. This comprehensive approach aims to evaluate responses to targeted therapies guided by tumor genetics for advanced solid tumors.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding chemotherapy before surgery can improve outcomes for patients with high-risk dedifferentiated liposarcoma DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma LMS in the retroperitoneal area. This phase III trial compares standard surgery alone to surgery combined with chemotherapy, aiming to improve disease-free survival for these patients. The study is randomized and open-label, involving multiple centers. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The standard group undergoes large curative surgery within four weeks after randomization. The experimental group receives three cycles of chemotherapy tailored to their sarcoma typedoxorubicin and ifosfamide for high-grade liposarcoma, or doxorubicin and dacarbazine for leiomyosarcomastarting within two weeks of randomization, followed by a reassessment and surgery within three to six weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle. During the study, patients are closely monitored through imaging and pathology reviews to confirm tumor characteristics and treatment effects. Researchers measure disease-free survival over seven years, along with overall survival, recurrence rates, response to chemotherapy, side effects, complications, and quality of life for up to eight years. Participants provide tumor tissue and blood samples for research, and their health and safety are carefully tracked throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, side effects, and optimal dose of cabozantinib combined with standard chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with osteosarcoma. This phase IIIII trial aims to compare the effects of adding cabozantinib, a kinase inhibitor that may slow tumor growth, to the usual chemotherapy drugs methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. The study focuses on patients under 40 years old with high-grade osteosarcoma, including both localized and metastatic cases. Participants receive treatment in two main phases. The feasibility phase now closed tested cabozantinib with chemotherapy in metastatic patients with resectable tumors, using cycles of oral cabozantinib and intravenous chemotherapy drugs over several months. The ongoing efficacy phase randomly assigns patients to either standard chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy combined with cabozantinib, with treatment divided into induction, consolidation, and maintenance cycles lasting 35 or 28 days each. Imaging scans, blood samples, and surgery are part of the treatment and evaluation process. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including X-rays, CT scans, MRI, PET or bone scans, and blood sample collection at diagnosis and throughout treatment. Researchers monitor event-free survival, overall survival, symptom burden, and side effects reported by patients. The trial lasts up to 5 years after treatment to assess long-term outcomes, gather tumor and blood samples for further biological studies, and evaluate the impact of cabozantinib addition on patient health and response.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, side effects, and best dose of novobiocin in patients with solid tumors that have alterations in DNA repair genes. Novobiocin is an antibiotic that blocks a protein called DNA polymerase theta, which helps repair damaged DNA in cells. This study focuses on patients with tumors carrying specific gene mutations related to DNA repair, who may or may not have received prior PARP inhibitor treatment. Participants receive novobiocin orally once daily for 5 days followed by 2 days off each week, with treatment cycles repeating every 28 days if the disease does not progress or toxicity is unacceptable. Throughout the study, patients undergo tumor biopsies, medical imaging scans, and blood sample collection. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 to 6 months for 2 years to monitor outcomes. During the trial, researchers monitor the maximum tolerated dose and recommend a phase 2 dose of novobiocin. They also assess anti-tumor activity, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Additional analyses include genetic sequencing and gene expression studies on tumor biopsies. Outcome measures include radiological response, progression-free survival, duration of response, and biological effectiveness over up to 2 years of observation.

Researchers are evaluating dose-escalated radiation therapy compared to usual care for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have already completed 4 to 6 months of chemotherapy. The study is a phase III trial aiming to determine if higher doses of radiation can improve 3-year overall survival, as well as assess effects on tumor progression, chemotherapy-free intervals, treatment toxicity, and quality of life. This trial is led by NRG Oncology and focuses on patients without disease progression after initial chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group receives standard care, which may include additional chemotherapy options such as FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX, or gemcitabinenab-paclitaxel, standard radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, or observation. The second group receives dose-escalated radiation therapy delivered in either 5 or 25 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy for the 25-fraction option. After radiation, patients who have not completed 6 months of chemotherapy are encouraged to finish it, with treatment beyond 6 months at the physicians discretion. Imaging and tissue biopsies are performed throughout the study. Participants undergo various assessments including blood sample collection, CT scans, MRI, and optional PETCT scans before and during treatment. Tumor tissue biopsies are also collected. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months for the first 2 years and annually for an additional 3 years. Researchers measure overall survival, local disease progression, progression-free survival, chemotherapy-free intervals, and adverse events. Quality of life is evaluated using specific questionnaires over the course of participation.

Researchers are evaluating elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapies in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative early breast cancer who are at high risk of cancer returning. The study focuses on those who have had prior endocrine therapy and aims to measure how well elacestrant may prevent invasive breast cancer recurrence over five years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 345 mg of elacestrant daily for five years or continue their prior standard endocrine therapy, which may include an aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane or tamoxifen. The trial is open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer recurrence, survival, side effects, and quality of life. Evaluations include questionnaires on health status and physical functioning at baseline, six months, and annually for up to five years. Safety is tracked through adverse event reporting up to five years plus 28 days. The total participation duration can last up to five years with ongoing monitoring and data collection.