Comparing Spencer Technique With and Without Acromioclavicular Mobilization for Pain, Motion, and Function in Patients with Frozen Shoulder

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the effects of the Spencer technique alone versus Spencer technique combined with acromioclavicular (AC) joint mobilization to help manage frozen shoulder. This study aims to determine which treatment better reduces pain, improves shoulder range of motion, and decreases functional disability in patients aged 50 to 60 years with unilateral frozen shoulder. The research builds on past studies showing benefits of these techniques in shoulder rehabilitation and aims to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians. Participants receive one of two treatments: the Spencer technique, a series of seven specific shoulder movements performed with therapist assistance to improve mobility and function; or the Spencer technique combined with AC joint mobilization, where the therapist performs gentle, graded movements on the clavicle joint to stretch the capsule and relieve stiffness. Treatments are delivered in individual sessions lasting up to 30 minutes and repeated 3 to 5 times per session, 5 days a week. Throughout the study, participants are assessed for pain and disability using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 6 weeks. Researchers also measure shoulder range of motion and functional ability. The study involves careful monitoring of treatment effects and collects data to compare the two approaches. Total participation time and detailed follow-up are aligned with the intervention schedule and outcome assessments.

Compare the Effect of Spencer Technique With and Without AC Mobilization for FS Pathients