Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years - 65Years
All Genders
ID07023653

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures

Led by Indonesia University · Updated on 2025-06-17

40

Participants Needed

2

Research Sites

52 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the functional outcomes of patients who have experienced a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and undergone reconstruction surgery using hamstring grafts. The study compares two surgical techniques: the all-inside technique and the complete tibial tunnel technique. The hamstring graft, taken from the patient's posterior thigh, replaces the torn ligament during reconstruction to restore knee stability. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive ACL reconstruction surgery using either the all-inside technique, which creates shorter bone sockets secured with adjustable-loop suspensory fixation, or the complete tibial tunnel technique, which involves full-length bone tunnels and fixation with a bio-interference screw and fixed-loop suspensory device. Both methods use hamstring grafts, and surgeries will be performed under double-blind conditions. Participants will be followed up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery at an outpatient orthopedic clinic. Evaluations will include measurements of tibial translation, pain severity using a visual analogue scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, and Tegner-Lysholm knee scoring scales. The diameter of the hamstring graft will also be recorded during surgery. These assessments aim to compare knee function and recovery between the two surgical techniques over one year.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years - 65Years
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture
  • Patients within the age range of 18 to 65 years
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Patients with Multiple Ligament Injuries in the Knee Joint
  • Patients with a pregnancy condition
  • Patients with Severe Osteochondral Defect (ICRS 4)
  • Patients with signs of inflamation in knee joint

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Your Study Journey

Screening

Duration - 2 to 4 weeks

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.

1 visit (in-person)

Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care

Duration - 1 day

Participants undergo ACL reconstruction surgery using either the All-inside technique or the complete tibial tunnel technique.

1 surgery visit (in-person)

Post-operative Follow-up

Duration - 12 months

Participants are assessed through anamnesis and physical examination to evaluate clinical outcomes such as tibial translation, pain severity, IKDC score, and Tegner score.

4 visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively (in-person)

Trial Site Locations

Total: 2 locations

1

Indonesian University Hospital

Depok, Indonesia

Actively Recruiting

2

Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital

Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

P

Prof. Dr. dr. Andri M.T. Lubis SpOT (K)

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

DOUBLE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Number of Arms

2

Similar Trials

A Comparison of Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (A...

ACL Reconstruction

Actively Recruiting

1 location

ACL Reconstruction With Human Allograft Cortical Bone Screw ...

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Actively Recruiting

1 location

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Revision Surgery: French Na...

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Actively Recruiting

1 location

Frequently Asked Questions

Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here

Published Research Related To This Trial

Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique.

Panagiotis Kouloumentas, Efstratios Kavroudakis, Efstathios Charalampidis...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30888448

Effect of Graft Choice on Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry.

Richard Rahardja, Mark Zhu, Hamish Love...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31730379

Anthropometric study as a predictor of anterior cruciate ligament sizes in Asian Indonesian population.

Ludwig Ap Pontoh, Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Wahyu Widodo...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33745362

Avoiding allograft length mismatch during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patient height as an indicator of appropriate graft length.

John A Brown, Robert H Brophy, John Franco...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17337725

Graft-tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Intraoperative and cadaver measurement of the intra-articular graft length and the length of the patellar tendon.

M Denti, M Bigoni, P Randelli...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9704323

Minimizing Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Blumensaat's Line: A Cadaveric Study.

Karim Meijer, Michael Saper, Patrick Joyner...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29730211