Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.
Katrina G Witt, Sarah E Hetrick, Gowri Rajaram...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33884617/Actively Recruiting
Led by Emory University · Updated on 2024-11-12
397
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of culturally competent psychoeducational empowerment sessions for suicidal African-American women who are in abusive relationships. The study addresses the increased rates of suicide and suicidal thoughts in young black individuals, which may be due to factors such as poverty, abuse, discrimination, and difficult family life. It focuses on how cultural, social, and personal influences affect suicidal behavior and seeks to develop therapy tailored to these factors. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups in this single-blind study. One group will receive a psychoeducational intervention consisting of 10 weekly, 90-minute group sessions led by two therapists and guided by a treatment manual that incorporates cultural, social, and intrapersonal elements. The other group will receive enhanced treatment as usual, which includes regular mental health care plus an adherence protocol and access to weekly support groups and a resource room. Treatment and follow-up occur at Grady Health System. Participants will complete surveys at baseline, week 1, week 10 post-treatment, and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. These surveys assess suicide ideation, suicide attempts, spouse abuse, depression, hopelessness, and self-efficacy. The study involves monitoring changes in these measures over time to evaluate the interventions. Participation spans the treatment period plus a year of follow-up to track longer-term effects and safety.
CONDITIONS
Effectiveness of Empowerment Group Sessions for Treating Suicidal African American Women in Abusive Relationships
N
Nadine J. Kaslow, PhD
B
Barbara D'Orio, MD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Emory University
Lead Sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Psychoeducational empowerment group (PEI) | Enhanced Treatment As Usual (ETAU) | Culturally tailored empowerment group (community practice) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | A manual‑guided culturally competent psychoeducational empowerment group involving ten sessions, co‑led by two therapists and based on the Theory of Triadic Influence model | An enhanced usual‑care arm including an adherence support protocol plus access to a weekly support group and resource room | Group interventions that are culturally tailored and empowerment‑focused have been used outside the trial for similar women |
| Role in trial | Investigational arm being evaluated for effectiveness | Active comparator arm representing enhanced usual care | Represents current empowerment‑based group support outside the trial context |
| Primary use | To reduce suicidal ideation/behavior and related risk factors in suicidal, abused African‑American women | To provide adherence support plus psycho‑social resources as comparison care | Similar group‑based empowerment support aimed at improving suicidal and interpersonal outcomes |
| How it is given or performed | Delivered as ten group sessions guided by a treatment manual, co‑led by two therapists | Includes weekly support group participation and access to a resource room plus adherence protocol | Typically delivered as psychoeducational group sessions with cultural tailoring and empowerment content |
| Evidence status | Trial underway; effectiveness as yet unreported | Comparator care; its effectiveness is not established in trial context | Previous RCTs show similar culturally informed interventions reduced suicidal ideation, depression, and improved protective factors |
| Important limitations | Effectiveness within this specific trial population remains unknown until results are reported | As an enhanced usual‑care arm, it may not reflect standard care in broader practice | Prior evidence comes from small trials and may not fully match current trial specifics |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 1 week
Participants complete surveys about life events, concerns, and feelings before starting treatment.
2 visits (in-person)
Duration - 10 weeks
Participants receive one of two treatments: weekly psychoeducational empowerment group sessions or enhanced treatment as usual with support and adherence protocol.
Weekly visits for up to 10 weeks
Duration - 12 months
Participants complete follow-up surveys to assess treatment effects at 6 months and 12 months after treatment ends.
2 visits (in-person)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Katrina G Witt, Sarah E Hetrick, Gowri Rajaram...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33884617/Emory University
Lead Sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Collaborating Sponsor