Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol.
R L Collins, G A Parks, G A Marlatt
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3998247/Actively Recruiting
Led by Binghamton University · Updated on 2026-08-03
2532
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
Underage drinking is a significant issue in the United States, with many high school students using alcohol and facing negative consequences such as academic problems, impaired functioning, and risky behaviors. This research aims to test the effectiveness of two web-based interventions, the e-CHECKUP TO GO eCTG alone and combined with an electronic Parent-Based Intervention ePBI, in reducing alcohol use among high school juniors and seniors. The study uses a nationally representative sample to address the limited interventions available for older high school students. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four groups the eCTG program, the combined eCTGePBI program, the e-Parent Intervention alone, or a control group receiving no intervention. The eCTG provides personalized feedback about alcohol use and risks, while the e-Parent Intervention offers an electronic handbook to guide parents in discussing drinking with their teens. Data are collected over five waves including baseline, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-ups, with one wave involving parents at 3 months. During the study, participants and their parents complete assessments on alcohol use and consequences at multiple time points. Researchers measure changes in alcohol consumption and related negative outcomes throughout the year. The studys goal is to evaluate how these digital interventions affect drinking behavior and reduce harm. Participation involves completing surveys and using the web programs as assigned, with ongoing monitoring of outcomes up to 12 months.
CONDITIONS
Examining an Intervention to Reduce High School Drinking
N
Nadine Mastroleo, PhD
S
Sarah Ackerman, MS
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Binghamton University
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | e‑CHECKUP TO GO (web‑based program) | Combined e‑Parent and e‑CTG | e‑Parent Intervention (web‑based parental handbook) | No intervention | Typical school‑based alcohol prevention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | A brief web‑based program providing personalized feedback and information to reduce risky drinking among high school teens | A combined approach offering both the student web‑based eCTG program and a parent handbook intervention | A web‑based guide for parents to discuss drinking and related behavior with their teens | No intervention provided | Typical class‑ or school‑based alcohol prevention curriculum delivered in secondary schools |
| Role in trial | One of three experimental intervention arms | Experimental arm combining parent and teen web‑based programs | Experimental arm offering parent‑only web‑based intervention | Comparison group receiving no intervention | Common prevention context not tested in the trial |
| Primary use | Reduce underage alcohol use through personalized web‑based feedback | Support parent‑teen communication alongside personalized feedback | Improve parent‑teen discussion around drinking behaviors | No active prevention strategy applied | Deliver general alcohol education through school curriculum |
| How it is given or performed | Offered online directly to the teen, including personalized normative feedback | Teens receive eCTG online; parents access an electronic handbook | Parents access the handbook online to guide conversations with their teen | No program delivered | Delivered during class time by teachers or facilitators as alcohol education |
| Evidence status | Effectiveness currently under investigation; no published outcome data yet | Investigational; outcome data not yet available | Evaluated in trial; results not yet established | Serves as comparator; no intervention effect | Some evidence from meta‑analyses shows modest reductions in adolescent drinking with school‑based interventions |
| Important limitations | Effectiveness in this population unknown until results are available | Combined approach untested; effect sizes and comparative benefit unknown | Parent‑only intervention effect on teen drinking outcomes not yet measured | No prevention delivered; not reflective of typical school programming | Meta‑analyses show only modest impact, and not all school‑based programs are equally effective |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - 12 months
Participants receive access to assigned web-based programs or no intervention and complete assessments on alcohol use and related consequences over time.
Five assessment waves including baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-ups
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
PREVENTION
Number of Arms
4
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
R L Collins, G A Parks, G A Marlatt
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3998247/Haske van der Vorst, Rutger C M E Engels, Wim Meeus...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16784352/Jennifer P Read, Christopher W Kahler, David R Strong...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16536141/Binghamton University
Lead Sponsor