Brampton

Researchers are studying intismeran autogene combined with pembrolizumab to see if it can stop advanced melanoma, a type of skin cancer that has spread and cannot be removed by surgery, from growing or spreading. This Phase 2 study compares this combination to pembrolizumab with a placebo, aiming to find out if the new treatment helps people live longer without cancer progression. Immunotherapy, which helps the immune system fight cancer, is a standard treatment for advanced melanoma, and intismeran autogene is designed to boost the immune response against a person's specific cancer. Participants receive either intismeran autogene or a placebo through intramuscular injection, along with pembrolizumab given as an intravenous infusion. The study is randomized, double-blind, and controlled, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who gets the active treatment or placebo. This design helps to better understand the effects of intismeran autogene when combined with pembrolizumab. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for up to about 36 months to measure progression-free survival, which means the length of time participants live without the cancer worsening. Assessments include imaging scans to track tumor changes, tumor tissue collection for biomarker analysis, and documentation of any side effects. Participants may also have their mutation status checked and will be observed for safety throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of enicepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, for managing weight in adults with obesity or overweight who also have Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This Phase III study compares multiple doses of enicepatide to a placebo to understand its impact on weight loss in this population. Participants receive either enicepatide or a placebo once weekly through an integrated drug-device combination. The study uses a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design to assess the effects of the treatment. The placebo is volume-matched and administered using the same method as the active drug. During the study, participants will have their body weight changes measured up to week 72 to assess efficacy. Researchers will monitor weight changes as the primary outcome. Participants must be able to self-administer the injections or receive them from a trained individual, and their safety and adherence will be observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating enicepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, to see how well it works and how safe it is for weight management in adults who are obese or overweight and do not have Type 2 diabetes. The study compares different doses of enicepatide with a placebo to understand its effects. Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) of at least 30, or a BMI between 27 and 30 with at least one weight-related health issue such as prediabetes, hypertension, or sleep apnea. Participants will receive once-weekly injections of either enicepatide or a placebo using an integrated drug-device combination product. The treatment is randomized and double-blinded, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who gets the active medication or placebo during the study. The study is a Phase III trial, and treatments continue over a period leading up to week 72. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for changes in body weight, with the primary measure being the percent change from baseline to week 72. Safety and efficacy will be assessed regularly, and participants will self-administer the injections or receive help if needed. The study also tracks any side effects and overall health status to understand the long-term effects of enicepatide for weight management.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two dose levels of anvumetostat, a film-coated tablet, in participants with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific genetic deletion called MTAP. The study is a Phase 2 trial focusing on participants who have previously been treated for their advanced NSCLC. It also assesses the treatment's effect through independent blinded review to better understand its impact on the cancer. Participants receive anvumetostat as a monotherapy, with dosing schedules tracked closely. The study includes detailed monitoring of drug levels in the blood at various times during treatment cycles to understand how the medicine is absorbed and processed. Treatment continues through several cycles, with specific days designated for blood sampling to measure drug concentration and timing. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for tumor response using CT or MRI scans according to established criteria (RECIST 1.1). Researchers will also monitor the occurrence of any side effects or adverse events related to the treatment. The study period for measuring outcomes extends up to 35 months, allowing for long-term observation of safety, treatment response, and drug behavior in the body.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

This trial investigates the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with fluoropyrimidine and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) compared to trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab in adults with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 with a combined positive score of 1 or higher. Additionally, rilvegostomig combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy is studied separately to understand each component's contribution. This Phase 2, randomized, open-label, global study is conducted at 200-250 sites in about 25 countries. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three arms: Arm A receives rilvegostomig, fluoropyrimidine, and T-DXd; Arm B receives trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab; Arm C receives rilvegostomig, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy. Treatments are administered mostly by intravenous infusion every three weeks, with capecitabine given orally twice daily. The study compares these treatment regimens to evaluate their effects on the cancer. Throughout the study, participants undergo assessments including tumor measurements, organ function tests, and heart function evaluation to ensure safety and monitor disease progression. The main outcomes measured are progression-free survival and overall survival for up to approximately six years. Researchers will also monitor adverse events and overall health status during and after treatment.

Researchers are evaluating how CDR132L, a potential new medicine, affects the structure and function of the heart in people living with heart failure who have preserved ejection fraction and left ventricular hypertrophy. This phase 2 study compares different doses of CDR132L with a placebo, which is an inactive treatment. The study aims to understand the safety and effectiveness of CDR132L in reversing heart remodeling in this population. Participants will receive either CDR132L or placebo administered intravenously once every 4 weeks. The study treatment period lasts about 24 weeks, followed by additional assessments leading up to a total study duration of approximately 60 weeks. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active treatment or placebo during the main phase. During the study, participants will undergo various evaluations including heart imaging via echocardiography to measure heart function and structure, laboratory tests including NT-proBNP levels, and monitoring of heart failure symptoms. The main outcome measured is the change in normalized microRNA-132-3p levels from baseline to week 24. Researchers will also monitor safety and treatment effects throughout the study, which includes regular visits and assessments over the full 60-week period.

Researchers are evaluating insulin icodec, a once-weekly insulin injection, compared to insulin glargine, a once-daily injection, in adults with type 1 diabetes. The study aims to see how well weekly insulin icodec controls blood sugar levels compared to daily insulin glargine when both are combined with insulin aspart. This phase 3 study will last about 26 weeks, or roughly 8.5 months. Participants will receive either insulin icodec or insulin glargine, both given as subcutaneous injections. All participants will also use insulin aspart as a subcutaneous injection. The study compares these two insulin regimens to assess their effects on blood sugar control over the 26-week period. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from the start of the study to week 26. Participants will follow the study protocol including self-measured plasma glucose profiles. Safety and efficacy will be evaluated throughout the treatment period to understand the impact of the insulin regimens on blood sugar control and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating how well the approved weekly injectable insulin icodec controls blood sugar levels compared to daily injectable basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes. This Phase 4 study focuses on people who need to start basal insulin treatment and have had type 2 diabetes for at least 180 days. The goal is to understand the effectiveness of once-weekly insulin icodec against standard daily basal insulins in real-world clinical practice over about 13 months. Participants will receive either insulin icodec once a week or one of the daily basal insulin analogues, such as insulin glargine, insulin detemir, or insulin degludec. Both treatments are given by subcutaneous injection. The choice between weekly or daily insulin is based on current treatment standards for type 2 diabetes. The study lasts approximately 52 weeks, during which participants maintain their assigned insulin regimen. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in participants' blood sugar control using the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test from the start until week 52. Participants will have their HbA1c measured within 90 days before starting the treatment. Safety and any reactions to the insulin will also be tracked. The study aims to assess how well the weekly insulin icodec works compared to daily basal insulins in managing blood sugar over a year.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of divarasib combined with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin. The study focuses on adults with advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific KRAS G12C mutation. This is a Phase III trial aiming to improve first-line treatment options for these patients. Participants will receive one of two treatment combinations. One group will take divarasib orally once daily along with pembrolizumab given through an intravenous infusion every three weeks. The other group will receive pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin, all administered by intravenous infusion every three weeks. Treatment schedules and dosages are carefully monitored during the study. Throughout the study, participants will be regularly assessed for progression-free survival and overall survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately five years. Researchers will perform various evaluations including tumor measurements and safety monitoring. This long-term observation helps to understand the treatments' effects and safety over time, supporting informed decisions for future lung cancer therapies.