Fredericton

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of delgocitinib cream 20 mg/g applied twice daily compared to a cream vehicle in treating adults with mild to severe palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). This phase 2a, double-blind, two-arm trial focuses on adults diagnosed with PPP, a condition characterized by persistent pustules on the palms and/or soles, lasting more than three months. The study aims to assess skin improvement using the PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) and other clinical evaluations over 16 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to apply either delgocitinib cream or the cream vehicle twice daily during a 16-week treatment period. The study involves approximately 9 visits over about 18 weeks in total. The trial is designed to compare the two treatments' effects on PPP severity, with a thorough monitoring process throughout the study period. During the trial, participants will undergo clinical assessments including photographic evaluations to confirm PPP diagnosis, PPPASI scoring to measure skin improvement, and physician global assessments. Safety and treatment adherence will be closely monitored. The main outcome measure is the number of participants achieving at least a 75% improvement in PPPASI score from baseline at week 16. The study also includes safety checks and follow-up to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are investigating the long-term safety and effectiveness of APG777, a treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), in patients who have already completed an initial APG777 study. This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind study focuses on those who may benefit from extended treatment with APG777 to better understand its ongoing effects and safety over time. The study includes three main periods: a screening visit that occurs at the end of the previous study's maintenance period, an extended treatment period where participants receive APG777 subcutaneous injections every 12 or 24 weeks, and a post-treatment follow-up period. Participants will continue using their chosen non-medicated moisturizer from the previous study throughout this extension. During the study, participants' health and response to treatment will be closely monitored, including tracking any treatment-emergent adverse events for up to three years. Researchers will assess the long-term safety and efficacy of APG777 while ensuring participants remain compliant with study protocols. This ongoing observation aims to provide detailed information on how APG777 affects patients over extended use.

Researchers are evaluating different treatment strategies for patients hospitalized with Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN BSIs) through the BALANCE+ trial. This adaptive platform trial uses an open-label, pragmatic design embedded in routine care to address important questions in managing GN BSIs, including antibiotic treatment duration, antibiotic de-escalation, oral antibiotic options, central line management, specific pathogen treatment, and follow-up blood cultures. The study builds on previous research and aims to improve patient outcomes and reduce antimicrobial resistance, a growing global health concern. The trial includes multiple treatment comparisons, such as de-escalation versus no de-escalation of antibiotics, oral beta-lactams versus non-beta-lactams, central vascular catheter retention versus replacement, cephalosporin versus carbapenem for low-risk AmpC organisms, and routine follow-up blood cultures versus no routine follow-up. Treatments are tailored based on blood culture results and clinical decisions, with specific protocols for antibiotic switching and catheter management. The trial uses Bayesian methods with interim analyses after every 1000 patients initially, then every 200 patients, and stops domains based on predefined criteria or sample sizes. Participants are patients admitted to hospitals with confirmed Gram-negative bacteremia who meet eligibility criteria for each domain. Assessments include monitoring for death, reinfection, readmission, and new antimicrobial resistance over 90 days, measured by the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) scale. The trial incorporates detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria and collects data through routine clinical care, ensuring ongoing evaluation of treatment effectiveness and safety throughout the study period.

Researchers are conducting a global study to understand the impact of moderate to severe alopecia areata (AA), non-segmental vitiligo (NSV), and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on adolescents and adults. This study aims to assess the burden these conditions place on patients' quality of life and daily functioning in a large real-world population. The study involves participants diagnosed by a physician with one of the three conditions: AA, NSV, or HS. There are no interventional treatments or medications being tested in this study, as it is observational in nature. Data collection focuses on patient-reported outcomes and measures that evaluate disease severity and its effects. Participants will complete various questionnaires and assessments related to their condition, such as the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS) for AA, the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) for scalp hair loss in AA, the Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) and Vitiligo Quality of Life Score (VitiQoL) for vitiligo, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4) for HS. These tools help researchers understand how symptoms affect quality of life and disease severity. The study collects information up to the day of the study visit.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a skin condition causing deep, painful bumps that appear where skin rubs together. These bumps can swell, become red, and sometimes fill with pus, turning into abscesses that may burst. Over time, HS can lead to scars and tunnels on or under the skin. This study aims to evaluate how safe and effective the drug zasocitinib is for adults with moderate to severe HS, comparing it to a placebo in a Phase 2 trial. Participants will receive either zasocitinib or a placebo capsule daily for 16 weeks. The placebo looks the same but contains no medicine. After this initial 4-month period, all participants, including those who first received placebo, will be offered zasocitinib for up to an additional 8 months. Throughout the study, participants will visit the clinic 12 times for treatment and monitoring. During the visits, researchers will assess treatment response, including the percentage of participants achieving a 75% reduction in HS signs at week 16. They will also monitor safety and tolerance of the medication. Participants will undergo various evaluations such as physical exams, lab tests, and questionnaires to track disease progress and side effects. The study includes careful follow-up to ensure participant safety and to gather detailed information on the drug's effects over the total study duration of up to 12 months.

Vitiligo is a long-term autoimmune condition where the immune system mistakenly attacks skin cells that produce pigment, leading to patches of skin that lose color. This study focuses on adults with nonsegmental vitiligo, where symmetrical patches of depigmentation appear on both sides of the body. The trial aims to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and tolerability of zasocitinib in treating this condition in adults aged 18 to 75 years. Participants will receive either zasocitinib capsules or placebo capsules that look identical but contain no medicine. The treatment period lasts up to one year (52 weeks). Those initially receiving placebo will switch to zasocitinib after about six months. During the study, participants will visit the clinic 11 times for treatment and monitoring. Throughout the trial, researchers will assess how well participants respond to treatment by measuring improvement in facial vitiligo using a standardized scoring index at baseline and after 24 weeks. Additional evaluations include safety monitoring and adherence to the study procedures. Participants will undergo clinical assessments, laboratory tests, and provide informed consent before starting the trial.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and often painful skin disease that causes lumps, abscesses, and scars in areas like under the breasts, armpits, inner thighs, groin, and buttocks. Researchers are evaluating the investigational drug lutikizumab compared to placebo in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe HS. This study aims to assess the disease activity and safety of lutikizumab in a Phase 3 clinical trial involving about 1280 participants worldwide.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of bimekizumab compared to a placebo in adults who have palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), a skin condition affecting the palms and soles. This Phase 3 study aims to better understand how well bimekizumab works in treating PPP and to assess any safety concerns in participants with this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either bimekizumab or a matching placebo at specific scheduled times. The study includes a double-blind period where neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is being given. An open-label extension phase will follow, allowing all participants to receive bimekizumab to further evaluate its effects. During the study, participants will undergo assessments to measure the severity of their PPP, including the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Investigator Global Assessment (PPP-IGA) response at Week 16. Researchers will monitor skin symptoms, treatment safety, and overall health. The study involves regular visits and evaluations to track progress and any side effects over the course of the trial.

This trial investigates the effectiveness of Pumitamig compared to Pembrolizumab in adults with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior treatment and whose tumors express PD-L1 at 50% or higher. The study targets individuals with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, focusing on those with measurable disease and good performance status. It is a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study designed to compare these two treatments as first-line options for this patient group. Participants will receive either Pumitamig or Pembrolizumab at specified doses on scheduled days. The treatments are given as monotherapy, meaning each participant receives only one of these drugs throughout the study. The study does not mention additional treatment phases or extensions, focusing on the direct comparison of these two drugs for initial treatment. Throughout the study, researchers will assess how long participants live without their cancer worsening, using standardized criteria over about three years. Overall survival will also be tracked for up to five years. Participants will be monitored regularly to evaluate their response to treatment and overall health. Safety and effectiveness outcomes will be gathered through medical assessments consistent with clinical trial standards for NSCLC.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and tolerability of elranatamab combined with iberdomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a cancer that starts in plasma cells. This Phase 1 study has two parts: the first focuses on safety and tolerability, while the second determines the appropriate dose of this combination treatment. Relapsed means the disease has returned after improvement, and refractory means it does not respond to treatment. All participants receive elranatamab as a subcutaneous injection and take iberdomide orally once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle. Treatment continues until the disease worsens, unacceptable side effects occur, or the participant chooses to stop. The study drugs include elranatamab, a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody, and iberdomide, a cereblon-modulating agent. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the study with evaluations of side effects and treatment responses. Safety is assessed by tracking dose-limiting toxicities during the first treatment cycle and adverse events for up to 90 days after the last dose. The overall goal is to understand if this treatment combination is safe and tolerable for patients with multiple myeloma.