Frejus

Researchers are evaluating elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapies in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative early breast cancer who are at high risk of cancer returning. The study focuses on those who have had prior endocrine therapy and aims to measure how well elacestrant may prevent invasive breast cancer recurrence over five years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 345 mg of elacestrant daily for five years or continue their prior standard endocrine therapy, which may include an aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane or tamoxifen. The trial is open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer recurrence, survival, side effects, and quality of life. Evaluations include questionnaires on health status and physical functioning at baseline, six months, and annually for up to five years. Safety is tracked through adverse event reporting up to five years plus 28 days. The total participation duration can last up to five years with ongoing monitoring and data collection.

Researchers are studying the use of ribociclib, a CDK46 inhibitor, in women with early hormone receptor-positive HR and HER2-negative breast cancer who are at intermediate risk of cancer recurrence. The study aims to see if patients can avoid chemotherapy, which has significant side effects, by using ribociclib along with hormone therapy after surgery. This phase III trial builds on the NATALEE study, which showed that ribociclib added to hormone therapy improved survival free of invasive disease in similar patients. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ribociclib plus endocrine hormone therapy, and the other receiving chemotherapy followed by ribociclib and endocrine therapy. Ribociclib treatment lasts for three years, and chemotherapy is given before starting ribociclib and hormone treatment. The trial aims to compare the outcomes of chemotherapy de-escalation versus standard treatment in this patient group. During the study, participants will attend scheduled visits for treatment and monitoring, including laboratory tests, heart monitoring with ECG, and questionnaires about their quality of life. Researchers will track invasive breast cancer-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival and treatment side effects for up to 12 years. Safety and quality of life assessments will continue during and after treatment to evaluate the long-term effects and benefits of the treatment approaches.

Researchers are investigating the use of Trastuzumab deruxtecan T-DXd in adults with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer. This includes patients who have previously received chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer or have hormone receptor-positive disease treated with endocrine therapy but are unsuitable for further endocrine treatment. The study aims to understand treatment effectiveness, patient characteristics, and experiences in a real-world setting through a non-interventional approach. Participants will be observed while receiving either T-DXd or conventional chemotherapy as part of their routine care, without any drug administration by the study itself. The study includes two groups one with patients having HER2-low breast cancer treated with T-DXd after prior chemotherapy, and another with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-low or HER2-ultralow breast cancer patients treated with either T-DXd or conventional chemotherapy but not prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Data will be collected on treatments, side effects, and management of adverse drug reactions. During the study, participants demographic and clinical data, treatment patterns, tolerability, and quality of life will be monitored over approximately 37 months. Assessments include the time to next treatment, treatment discontinuation, physician-reported safety events, patient-reported tolerability, quality of life questionnaires, and symptom diaries. This long-term observation will help evaluate real-world outcomes and patient experiences with T-DXd and conventional chemotherapy in this population.

Researchers are comparing two methods for the second reading of screening mammograms in women aged 50 to 74 as part of a breast cancer screening program. The study aims to determine if the AI-assisted reading process is not worse than the standard radiologist reading and if it may be more cost-effective. It focuses on mammograms deemed normal or showing benign lesions from the first reading. Participants mammograms undergo two review paths the standard second reading by a certified radiologist, and an AI-assisted reading where mammograms flagged as suspicious by the AI are then reviewed by a radiologist. The final decision is based on the more concerning assessment from either method. Women will be recalled for further exams if either reading indicates suspicion. During the study, participants receive screening mammograms and their results are monitored for recall rate, cancer detection, sensitivity, specificity, economic impact, time to results, and reading time. The study will follow up for up to 48 months to measure these outcomes. Participants must consent and meet eligibility requirements related to health, imaging quality, and availability for the study duration.

This research aims to study people who have had their first episode of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis DVT in their lower limbs to understand the risk and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome PTS, the most common long-term complication of DVT. The study focuses on evaluating how the amount of thrombosis blood clot burden measured by the Venous Volumetric Index VVI on ultrasound relates to the development and severity of PTS assessed by the Villalta scale over 6 months. Participants will be followed at multiple times around 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after diagnosis. At each visit, doctors will assess symptoms and signs to calculate the Villalta score and perform venous ultrasounds to measure thrombosis burden using the VVI. Blood samples will be collected at several visits to study inflammation, coagulation, and clot breakdown factors. Quality of life questionnaires will also be completed at 3 and 6 months. During the study, symptom assessments, ultrasound exams, blood tests, and questionnaires will help researchers understand how the thrombosis burden at baseline and over time relates to the occurrence and severity of PTS. The study ends with the 6-month visit. Researchers will monitor the presence of moderate to severe PTS and changes in clot burden to identify important prognostic factors that may guide future prevention and treatment strategies.

Researchers are investigating whether using a genetic test called Prosigna4 can help decide if chemotherapy is necessary for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive HR and HER2-negative breast cancer. This study aims to determine if treatment guided by this test produces similar outcomes to the standard approach of systematic chemotherapy. The trial focuses on younger women who often experience more side effects from chemotherapy, affecting their quality of life and work capacity. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the experimental group, treatment depends on the Prosigna4 score women with a high score above 60 will receive chemotherapy plus hormone therapy, while those with a lower score will receive only hormone therapy with ovarian suppression. The control group will receive the standard treatment of chemotherapy followed by hormone therapy. The study includes a pre-inclusion period for eligibility testing and randomization. Throughout the study, participants will complete questionnaires about quality of life, treatment side effects, emotional well-being, and other health measures for up to five years after randomization. Researchers will monitor cancer recurrence, survival, fertility, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and other outcomes. Regular assessments include physical activity levels, adherence to therapy, and patient perceptions of treatment and participation, aiming to evaluate the safety and impact of treatment guided by the genetic test.

Researchers are studying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to identify clinical and biological factors that predict how well fruquintinib works in real-world settings. The study aims to confirm survival and safety results seen in previous trials and to better understand treatment outcomes, especially in older patients aged 70 and above, who have been underrepresented in earlier research. This cohort is designed to optimize treatment pathways by pinpointing patients who may benefit most from fruquintinib. Participants will receive fruquintinib, an oral drug that targets specific blood vessel growth receptors, given as 5 mg daily for 21 days followed by a 7-day break. This cycle repeats until the cancer progresses, unacceptable side effects occur, the patient dies, or the patient chooses to stop treatment. The study includes patients treated under compassionate use or after marketing authorization in France, integrating routine clinical practice data. During the study, participants will be monitored for overall survival up to one year after starting treatment, which is the main outcome measured. Additional monitoring includes progression-free survival within the same timeframe. The study involves collecting biological samples like circulating tumor DNA and tumor tissue blocks. Safety, survival, and treatment response data will be gathered to support understanding of fruquintinibs effects in everyday clinical use. The study is expected to continue until the end of 2031.

Researchers are conducting a French non-interventional longitudinal multicenter cohort study to evaluate the added value of olaparib for treating patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer mCRPC in real-world settings. The study aims to assess treatment sequencing, effectiveness, safety, and BRCA testing patterns, helping to inform future clinical practice. This observational study is sponsored by AstraZeneca. The study observes adult male patients who have started olaparib treatment within at least the last two months or who participated in a funded early access program. There are no assigned treatment groups or interventions beyond olaparib use as decided by their physician. Data collection continues up to 32 months to capture treatment patterns and patient characteristics. Participants data on treatment duration, disease progression, therapy sequences, symptomatic skeletal events, and BRCA testing timing will be collected and analyzed up to 24 months from olaparib initiation. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and physicians will be gathered at the end of enrollment. The study monitors reasons for dose changes, interruptions, and treatment cessation, ensuring comprehensive real-world evidence about olaparib in mCRPC patients.

This research aims to observe patients in France with HER2-negative early breast cancer who are treated with olaparib, a medication chosen by their doctors. The study focuses on understanding how often patients complete the full course of olaparib treatment and gathers information on related genetic factors and medical history. It is a national, multicenter, prospective observational study without experimental treatment assignment. Participants in this study receive adjuvant olaparib treatment as part of their usual care under their physicians discretion. The study does not assign treatments but follows patients who start olaparib, tracking their treatment progress for up to 18 months after inclusion. There are no additional interventions or placebo groups. Throughout the study, researchers collect data on treatment completion rates, types of BRCA mutations, variant types, medical history, and the time until olaparib treatment stops. Participation involves observational follow-up, with no extra treatment visits beyond routine care. The overall participation lasts 18 months after a patients enrollment, focusing on real-world treatment experiences and outcomes.

The trial investigates whether adding a digital telemonitoring platform called CUREETY TECHCARE to the usual care can improve outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who have not received prior treatment and are starting their first systemic therapy. It aims to understand if telemonitoring can enhance patient quality of life, reduce hospitalization rates, and improve overall survival compared to standard care alone. Participants in the telemonitoring group will use the Cureety platform weekly to report symptoms. The platform analyzes these symptoms and classifies the patients condition into risk categories, which guide tailored advice and alerts for medical staff. The medical team monitors patients daily via the platform and adjusts care as needed. The comparison group receives standard care without telemonitoring. During the study, patients complete quality of life questionnaires at baseline and regular intervals up to 24 months. Researchers will track time to quality of life deterioration, hospitalization-free survival, and overall survival as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes include treatment toxicity, treatment failure, clinical deterioration, adverse events, treatment compliance, satisfaction with telemonitoring, and socio-economic impacts. The study involves ongoing monitoring, data collection, and patient questionnaires over two years to assess the benefits and effects of telemonitoring.