Le Coudray

Researchers are studying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have a specific BRAFV600E mutation. This rare subtype of mCRC has poor prognosis and resistance to current treatments, especially in tumors with microsatellite stability or proficient mismatch repair. The study aims to collect detailed clinical data and biological samples to better understand treatment outcomes, resistance, and survival in real-world settings. Participants will provide blood samples and tumor tissue samples to support various research goals. The study will evaluate circulating tumor DNA during different lines of metastatic treatment to predict treatment response and resistance. It will also analyze the immune environment of BRAFV600E mCRC tumors and study specific subgroups with mismatch repair deficiencies. Clinical management data will be collected to inform future therapeutic approaches. During the study, patients will be monitored regularly with blood sample collections of 30 mL at each time point. Researchers will gather information about treatments, survival, and biological markers over time. The main outcome measured is overall survival from diagnosis up to five years. Patients must be able to comply with study procedures and provide informed consent. The study aims to improve knowledge of this aggressive cancer subtype and support development of new treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of the drug orforglipron compared with a placebo on cardiovascular outcomes in adults who have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to investigate major adverse cardiovascular events over a long period. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo orally. The study is event-driven and will continue until the occurrence of major cardiovascular events or up to about 5 years. The treatments are administered without revealing to participants which group they are in to ensure unbiased results. During the study, participants will be monitored for the time to the first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event. Researchers will collect data from baseline through the end of the study, which lasts approximately 5 years. Regular assessments will help evaluate the safety and effects of the treatments on cardiovascular health in this population.

This research aims to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of pelacarsen (TQJ230) in adults with established cardiovascular disease and elevated Lipoprotein(a) who have completed the parent trial CTQJ230A12301. The study is an open-label extension following the phase 3 parent study, providing participants continued access to pelacarsen after the initial trial. Participants will receive pelacarsen 80 mg by subcutaneous injection once a month during this open-label extension. The study is single-arm and multicenter, focusing on continued treatment with pelacarsen for up to 36 months after completion of the parent study. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess safety and tolerability, with particular attention to adverse events occurring up to 36 months. Researchers will collect data on health status throughout this period to understand the long-term effects of pelacarsen in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating whether ziltivekimab can help people who were hospitalized due to a heart attack by potentially reducing the development of heart disease and preventing new heart attacks or strokes. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab with a placebo, which is a dummy medicine that has no effect on the body. Both treatments are given by chance, with equal likelihood for participants to receive either ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will inject the study medicine once a month under the skin in the stomach, thigh, or upper arm. Ziltivekimab is given as an initial loading dose followed by monthly maintenance doses. The placebo group receives a matching injection schedule. The study duration is about two years. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for the time until the first serious heart-related event, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack, or non-fatal stroke. Participants will be closely observed from the start of randomization up to 25 months. The study includes regular follow-ups to assess safety and effectiveness of the treatments throughout this period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and performance of remote monitoring functions in pacemakers, specifically the ALIZEA, BOREA, and CELEA devices. These remote features include the Right Atrial Autothreshold (RAAT), Right Ventricular Autothreshold (RVAT), and technical remote alerts. The study focuses on patients with bradycardia who have recently received one of these pacemakers as part of their cardiac care. Participants will undergo implantation or device upgrade with an ALIZEA, BOREA, or CELEA dual chamber pacemaker. The study involves activating remote monitoring functions on these devices to track cardiac pacing performance and system safety. Follow-up visits will occur at 1 to 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 48 months after inclusion, during which device function and remote monitoring data will be assessed. During each follow-up, either in person or remotely, researchers will measure the pacemaker's performance, including pacing thresholds and remote alerts. Safety will be closely monitored throughout the entire 48-month study period. The main outcomes include changes in right atrial and right ventricular pacing thresholds and documentation of technical remote alerts between 1 and 3 months after device implantation.

Researchers are investigating whether the medicine vicadrostat, when taken together with empagliflozin, can lower the risk of heart-related problems in adults who have type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease but no history of heart failure. This study is a Phase III trial that compares the effects of vicadrostat plus empagliflozin to a placebo plus empagliflozin in people with these conditions. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group takes vicadrostat and empagliflozin tablets, and the other group takes placebo tablets that look like vicadrostat along with empagliflozin. All participants take one tablet daily for a period ranging from two and a half years up to four years and three months. Throughout the study, participants continue their usual medications for diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. During up to 51 months of participation, participants visit the study site regularly where doctors collect health information and blood samples. Researchers track when participants experience cardiovascular events such as heart-related deaths or heart failure events. The study also monitors participants’ overall health and any side effects they may experience to assess the safety and effects of the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of early sitting out of bed in an arm-chair position on the functional recovery of patients in intensive care who are on mechanical ventilation. The study focuses on patients with ICU-acquired weakness and aims to determine if this early mobilization technique improves functional and muscular recovery compared to a conservative strategy of sitting in bed. The research hypothesis is that early armchair positioning enhances functional recovery. Participants will be placed in a chair once awake with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -1 and +1 for more than 12 hours. They will be seated daily for at least 30 minutes until discharge from intensive care or day 28, whichever comes first, unless there are temporary contraindications. If patients cannot communicate their wish to stop, their tolerance will be checked, and the chair session will not exceed 4 hours. During the study, researchers will assess participants' functional levels at discharge from intensive care or day 28, whichever occurs first. Patients will be monitored throughout their stay, and adherence to the intervention will be tracked. The total participation duration varies depending on the length of stay in intensive care, with functional recovery as the primary outcome measure.

About 30% of patients aged 65 and older experience a decline in functional ability due to hospital stays. Physical inactivity is common during hospitalization, often without medical reasons, leading to loss of independence, muscle strength, and higher risks after leaving the hospital. Research shows that walking slowly for 25 to 40 minutes daily can improve patients' function, but this can be hard to achieve without enough physiotherapists available in hospitals. This study is testing the use of a vibrating watch that reminds patients to be active by walking or doing strengthening exercises. The watch will vibrate six times a day to encourage movement tailored to each patient's physical abilities and environment. There is a control group where the watch vibrates only once a day. This simple device aims to increase physical activity without needing extra hospital staff or resources. Participants will be monitored for changes in their functional capacity during their hospital stay. Assessments include a physical performance test within 24 hours of admission and within 48 hours before discharge. Researchers will measure how the vibrating reminders affect patients' ability to move and perform daily activities safely and independently. The study focuses on hospitalized patients aged 50 and over who are frail but able to get up from a chair and communicate with staff.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of tozorakimab, added to standard care, in adults hospitalized with viral lung infection who need supplemental oxygen. The study focuses on preventing death or progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation by day 28. This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing tozorakimab to placebo in patients with viral lung infection causing acute respiratory failure. Participants will receive a single intravenous dose of either tozorakimab or a matching placebo on the first day of the study. Both groups continue to receive standard care for their viral lung infection. The study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of tozorakimab as an add-on therapy in this patient population. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor participants for survival and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO up to 28 days after treatment. The main outcome measured is the proportion of patients who die or require mechanical ventilation or ECMO by day 28. Participants will be closely observed during hospitalization, with data collected on their respiratory status and treatment outcomes to evaluate the study drug's impact and safety.