Saint Gregoire

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of combining durvalumab and domvanalimab compared to durvalumab plus placebo in adults with locally advanced Stage III, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose disease has not progressed after definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy cCRT. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study aims to provide new insights into treatment options for this patient population. Participants will receive either durvalumab and domvanalimab or durvalumab plus placebo as intravenous infusions every four weeks, beginning on Day 1 and continuing for up to 12 months. The study includes two groups one receiving the combination of durvalumab and domvanalimab, and the other receiving durvalumab with a placebo. Both treatments are given through infusion to assess their effects on disease progression and safety. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments including monitoring progression-free survival for up to 8 years after randomization. Other measures include overall survival, response rates, duration of response, and various time-to-event outcomes related to disease progression and symptom deterioration. Researchers will also evaluate drug concentrations and immune responses approximately 12 weeks after the last dose. Participants can expect scheduled visits for infusions and evaluations as part of this long-term study.

Researchers are comparing two treatment combinations for adults with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that have a specific KRAS p.G12C mutation and are negative for PD-L1 expression. The study aims to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival between participants receiving sotorasib with platinum doublet chemotherapy and those receiving pembrolizumab with platinum doublet chemotherapy. This phase 3, randomized, open-label trial is led by Amgen and includes participants with stage IV or advanced stage IIIBC NSCLC. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sotorasib orally combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed, or pembrolizumab intravenously combined with the same chemotherapy drugs. These treatments are given as front-line therapy. The study includes a treatment period with these drug combinations and monitoring for outcomes such as response rates and quality of life over several years. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed through various measures including survival status, tumor response, and quality-of-life questionnaires focusing on lung cancer symptoms. Researchers will monitor safety by tracking adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Treatment concentrations of sotorasib will also be measured up to 64 days after starting. The total study duration includes follow-up for up to approximately 5.5 years to fully evaluate treatment effects and outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating BMS-986365 compared to the investigators choice of therapy in men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. This phase 3, randomized trial aims to assess how well BMS-986365 works and how safe it is, focusing on radiographic progression-free survival. The study includes participants who have previously been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and have metastatic prostate cancer confirmed by imaging. Participants are randomized into groups receiving either one of two dose levels of BMS-986365 or an active comparator treatment chosen by the investigator, which includes either Docetaxel plus PrednisonePrednisolone or Enzalutamide or Abiraterone plus PrednisonePrednisolone. The study has two parts Part 1 compares the different doses and comparator arms, while Part 2 focuses on the selected BMS-986365 dose versus the investigators choice. Dosing schedules are specified but not detailed here. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to evaluate cancer progression, pain and symptom questionnaires, blood tests, electrocardiograms, and monitoring for adverse events. Outcomes measured include progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, pain progression, and quality of life changes. The study may last up to 4 years, with ongoing safety and efficacy evaluations throughout this time.

Researchers are evaluating the disease-free survival in participants with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer HR-NMIBC who have previously received Bacillus Calmette-Gurin BCG treatment. This Phase 3 trial compares a new treatment called TAR-210 with the investigators choice of intravesical chemotherapy. The study focuses on participants with specific fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR alterations and aims to find out which treatment better prevents cancer recurrence or progression after BCG therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group A will have TAR-210 inserted into the bladder starting on Day 1 and continuing for about 2 years. Group B will receive either mitomycin C or gemcitabine chemotherapy, chosen by the investigator, given once weekly for 4 to 6 weeks induction, followed by monthly maintenance doses for up to 1 year, with a possible second year of maintenance at the investigators discretion. All treatments are delivered directly into the bladder intravesically. During the study, participants will be monitored for up to 5 years to track disease-free survival and other outcomes such as recurrence-free survival, time to next intervention, disease worsening, progression, and overall survival. Researchers will also assess side effects, laboratory and vital sign changes, and quality of life using specific questionnaires. The study includes regular evaluations and safety monitoring throughout the participation period, which may last several years.

Researchers are evaluating whether combining the investigational drug PF-06821497 with enzalutamide works better than enzalutamide alone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer mCRPC who have not yet received certain advanced anti-cancer treatments. This global, multicenter, randomized Phase 3 study focuses on participants who have not been treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors like enzalutamide or abiraterone before, except for androgen deprivation therapy or first-generation anti-androgen agents. The study is sponsored by Pfizer and aims to assess treatment effects in this patient population. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one group will receive PF-06821497 875 mg twice daily combined with enzalutamide 160 mg once daily, while the other will receive a placebo twice daily plus enzalutamide 160 mg once daily. The study includes several phases screening, randomization, treatment, safety follow-up, and long-term follow-up. Treatment continues over a period of up to approximately three years for primary outcomes, with ongoing assessments for up to five years for some secondary outcomes. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including scans to monitor disease progression, blood tests to measure prostate-specific antigen levels and circulating tumor DNA, patient-reported pain and quality of life questionnaires, and evaluations of adverse events. The primary outcome is radiographic progression-free survival measured from randomization up to about three years. Safety and long-term effects will be monitored through follow-up visits lasting up to five years. Participants will be followed closely throughout the study duration to track treatment impact and side effects.

Researchers are conducting a Phase III international trial to study the effects and safety of androgen deprivation therapy ADT with or without darolutamide in men newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer who have vulnerable functional abilities. This study specifically includes patients who have not chosen treatment with docetaxel or other androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. The goal is to evaluate how these treatments impact disease progression and patient health over time. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ADT plus darolutamide 600 mg taken orally twice daily, and the other receiving ADT plus a placebo taken with the same schedule. Treatment will continue until imaging shows disease progression or until the patient or doctor decides to stop for reasons such as side effects or other health issues. After stopping treatment, patients will enter a follow-up phase lasting up to 10 years to monitor survival, further treatments, and any ongoing or new side effects. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to check for cancer progression, blood tests, evaluations of urinary symptoms, and quality of life questionnaires. Researchers will track outcomes like progression-free survival, overall survival, symptom changes, and adverse events. Monitoring visits will occur periodically both during treatment and follow-up to gather comprehensive data on health status and treatment effects.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer NMIBC is a type of bladder tumor that affects the inner lining of the bladder without invading the muscle layer. This research aims to collect and analyze real-world data on how NMIBC is managed and followed up in clinical practice across France. The study seeks to assess the performance of urine tests used to detect tumor recurrence and to understand variations in treatment and patient outcomes. The study is observational and involves collecting medical data from patients being monitored for NMIBC, including results from urine biomarker tests done before biopsies or resections. Urologists participating in the French Urology Association will record findings from regular bladder endoscopic exams and urine test results during routine care visits. Data analysis will focus on the accuracy of urine tests in predicting tumor recurrence and how this varies by tumor characteristics and prior treatments. Participants will have their medical history, treatments, and urine test results entered into a registry at enrollment. During follow-up visits scheduled as part of their personalized care, data on bladder exams and urine tests will be collected. Researchers will evaluate outcomes such as recurrence-free survival and the diagnostic value of urine biomarkers over a five-year period. The study plans to include around 8,000 patients over six years to improve understanding of NMIBC management and follow-up.

Researchers are investigating the use of endoscopic surgery as a less invasive alternative to traditional lumbar spine fusion for patients with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. This approach aims to decompress the lumbar spine while preserving its natural function and stability, potentially reducing the need for spinal fusion. The study explores whether endoscopic techniques can lower the rate of more invasive surgical interventions in this population. The study focuses on patients who require spinal decompression surgery and are considered for endoscopic procedures. It observes outcomes related to these minimally destructive surgical methods without introducing experimental drugs or devices. The main goal is to evaluate the rate of surgical reintervention within one year after the initial endoscopic surgery. Participants will be monitored over time to assess if further surgical procedures are needed. Researchers will review medical imaging and clinical data to understand the effectiveness of endoscopic decompression in avoiding fusion surgery. The study involves adults 18 years and older and tracks outcomes related to surgical reintervention during the follow-up period, with participation potentially lasting up to several years.

Researchers are evaluating whether the EMOCARE emotional monitoring software provides consistent results compared to standard questionnaires used to assess emotional states in patients with mild to moderately severe depressive episodes. This study aims to understand how well EMOCARE matches tools like PHQ-9, MADRS, GAD-7, BDI-II, and EQ-5D-5L, and to learn about any medical issues participants may experience when using this passive monitoring software. The study focuses on outpatients with major depressive disorder who use digital devices regularly. Participants will install the EMOCARE software on a smartphone, computer, or similar device and can activate or deactivate it during a six-week follow-up period. They will attend two scheduled visits at the centerone at the start and one six weeks laterto complete questionnaires and be interviewed by a doctor. Additionally, participants will complete questionnaires independently at home two and four weeks after the first appointment. A phone call from the doctor will take place three weeks after the initial visit to check on how participants are feeling. Participants will also keep a diary of symptoms, medical consultations, and any medication changes. Throughout the study, researchers will collect and compare scores from EMOCARE and various questionnaires at multiple time points, including baseline, two, four, and six weeks. They will monitor the acceptability of the device, adverse events, and changes in depression severity. The main outcomes measured are changes in EMOCARE scores and PHQ-9 scores from baseline to six weeks. The total participation duration is six weeks, with regular monitoring and assessments to understand emotional states and device use.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of ficerafusp alfa combined with pembrolizumab compared to placebo with pembrolizumab for adults with first-line PD-L1-positive, recurrent or metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. This study focuses on the dual targeting of EGFR and TGF-beta, which contribute to tumor growth and spread. It includes both phase 2 and phase 3 parts to identify the best dose and to compare treatment outcomes. In phase 2, participants are randomized into three groups receiving either higher or lower doses of ficerafusp alfa plus pembrolizumab, or placebo plus pembrolizumab. In phase 3, participants receive the selected optimal biologic dose of ficerafusp alfa with pembrolizumab or placebo with pembrolizumab in a 21 ratio. Treatments are given weekly or every three weeks depending on the drug, with careful monitoring throughout the study. Participants will undergo tumor biopsies or provide archival tissue, and receive regular assessments including imaging scans and lab tests to measure tumor response and safety. Researchers will track side effects, response rates, survival, and quality of life using standardized criteria over approximately 1 to 3 years. Safety monitoring continues up to 90 days after treatment ends. The total study duration extends through long-term follow-up to evaluate overall outcomes.