Aalen

Researchers are evaluating the clinical utility of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) as a prognostic marker for disease activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study in Germany aims to understand how sNfL values can influence patient management and treatment decisions. The study focuses on patients treated with category 1 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) who have incorporated sNfL testing into their care. Participants will either continue their current category 1 DMT, which includes therapies such as dimethylfumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta, and teriflunomide, or switch to ofatumumab based on their physician’s clinical judgment. There is no treatment allocation by the study itself. Data collection will cover up to 24 months, and the frequency of visits and assessments will follow routine clinical practice without a fixed protocol. During the study, baseline and follow-up data will be gathered according to standard care recommendations, including clinical evaluations and sNfL measurements. Researchers will monitor the proportion of patients with high sNfL levels over time to assess disease activity. The observational period is flexible and guided by the treating physician, with no additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures beyond standard care. Participants will be followed for up to two years to better understand how sNfL influences treatment management in relapsing MS.

Researchers are studying patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in the United States and Europe to understand their characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes over time. The study focuses on individuals who are receiving mavacamten, other treatments for obstructive HCM, or no treatment due to intolerance or failure of prior therapies. The research includes a United States sub-study to evaluate mavacamten's safety and a European sub-study to assess both its effectiveness and safety in real-world settings. Participants may receive mavacamten according to its product label or other symptomatic therapies such as beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or disopyramide based on standard care. The study includes those starting mavacamten, currently on other treatments, or untreated due to intolerance or failure of prior therapy. Treatment is observed during routine clinical care without altering prescribed therapy. Data collection occurs over several years to monitor long-term outcomes. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for heart function and symptoms, including measuring the left ventricular outflow tract gradient and monitoring the incidence of new or worsening heart failure up to five years. Researchers will gather information on patient health, treatment safety, and heart function changes through echocardiography and symptom evaluations. The study allows for long-term observation to better understand real-world treatment effects and outcomes in obstructive HCM patients.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and quality of life for combining Abemaciclib with either an Aromatase Inhibitor or Fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. This includes both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients receiving first-line treatment. The trial also explores biomarker research to understand responses and resistance to this combined endocrine therapy. Participants receive Abemaciclib 150 mg orally every 12 hours along with either an Aromatase Inhibitor (Anastrozole, Letrozole, or Exemestane) taken once daily in 28-day cycles, or Fulvestrant given by injection on days 1 and 15 of the first cycle, then on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Side effects and patient-reported outcomes are monitored using the CANKADO digital health app, allowing daily tracking alongside standard clinical documentation. During the study, patients regularly report symptoms and side effects through the app, and undergo laboratory tests, imaging, and clinical assessments to monitor disease progression and treatment safety. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival over up to 48 months. Safety and quality of life are also closely observed throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating whether systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LNE) improves overall survival in women with stage I or II endometrial cancer who have a high risk of recurrence. The study also aims to assess the impact of LNE on disease-free survival, quality of life, complications, side effects, and the number of lymph nodes removed. A total of 640 patients with confirmed high-risk endometrial cancer will be included in the trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the first group, patients will undergo a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with an additional omentectomy if they have serous or clear cell cancer types. The second group will receive the same procedures plus systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the left renal vein. This approach allows comparison between standard surgery and surgery with lymphadenectomy. During the study, patients will be monitored for overall survival over 60 months. Researchers will also evaluate disease-free survival and quality of life, while tracking complications and side effects of the treatments. Informed consent will be obtained, and patients’ compliance and health status will be regularly assessed. The trial includes close follow-up to observe long-term effects and outcomes of the surgical procedures.