Bad Kreuznach

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are studying metastatic colorectal carcinoma mCRC patients who have a specific BRAFV600E mutation, which is linked to poorer outcomes compared to those without it. This mutation leads to shorter survival times after initial treatments, prompting the need for new therapy combinations. This research aims to observe how the drugs encorafenib and cetuximab work together in real-world settings for patients who have already received prior systemic therapies. This non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal study focuses on patients treated with encorafenib plus cetuximab following prior systemic therapy. The study collects data on treatment effectiveness, safety, and quality of life among a broader patient population in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Patients may have started treatment up to three months before joining the study or plan to start soon, and the study observes their outcomes without influencing treatment decisions. Participants will be monitored through data collection on their disease and treatment profiles, including patient and physician assessments, adverse events, and treatment details. The main outcome measured is overall survival at 12 months after starting treatment. Additional information gathered includes treatment duration, dose intensity, interruptions, and patient-reported quality of life using questionnaires. Safety and tolerability are also evaluated throughout treatment, with follow-up averaging nine months.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a medicine called BI 690517 combined with empagliflozin in adults with chronic kidney disease CKD who are at risk of their kidney condition getting worse. The study includes people with or without type 2 diabetes and those who may already be taking medicines like angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ACEi, angiotensin receptor blockers ARB, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors SGLT2i. The goal is to understand if adding BI 690517 can help delay worsening kidney function, hospitalizations due to heart failure, or cardiovascular death. After a run-in period where all participants take empagliflozin and other standard medications, participants are randomly assigned to receive either BI 690517 tablets or placebo tablets once daily alongside empagliflozin. The run-in period confirms that participants are stabilized on empagliflozin before randomization. The treatment phase continues for about three to four years until enough kidney or heart-related events have occurred to compare outcomes between the two groups. During the study, participants visit the study site about five times in the first six months and then every six months thereafter. At these visits, health is regularly checked through blood and urine tests, blood pressure and weight measurements, kidney function monitoring, and collection of any side effect information. The main outcome measured is the time until the first occurrence of kidney disease progression, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

This research aims to strengthen the resilience of hospital staff teams by evaluating the TeamTime intervention. Unlike most programs focusing on individual resilience, this study centers on team resilience, exploring factors that promote or hinder the interventions implementation and effectiveness. Participants include hospital employees, and the research is conducted by the Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz. The TeamTime intervention has two phases first, team leaders receive training on healthy leadership, resilience, workplace safety, psychological empowerment, and coaching techniques. After this qualification, teams engage in regular sessions involving self-reflection, stress assessment, prioritization, and collaborative problem-solving. The study includes both an intervention group receiving TeamTime and a control group with no intervention. Participants will be surveyed at three points baseline, six months, and twelve months later. Assessments include questionnaires measuring individual, team, and organizational resilience, psychological empowerment, organizational commitment, team collaboration, personality traits, willingness to change, and psychosocial workplace factors. The study tracks how these measures evolve over time to understand the impact of the intervention on team resilience.