Eisenach

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating insulin icodec, a once-weekly insulin injection, compared to insulin glargine, a once-daily injection, in adults with type 1 diabetes. The study aims to see how well weekly insulin icodec controls blood sugar levels compared to daily insulin glargine when both are combined with insulin aspart. This phase 3 study will last about 26 weeks, or roughly 8.5 months. Participants will receive either insulin icodec or insulin glargine, both given as subcutaneous injections. All participants will also use insulin aspart as a subcutaneous injection. The study compares these two insulin regimens to assess their effects on blood sugar control over the 26-week period. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from the start of the study to week 26. Participants will follow the study protocol including self-measured plasma glucose profiles. Safety and efficacy will be evaluated throughout the treatment period to understand the impact of the insulin regimens on blood sugar control and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating how well the approved weekly injectable insulin icodec controls blood sugar levels compared to daily injectable basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes. This Phase 4 study focuses on people who need to start basal insulin treatment and have had type 2 diabetes for at least 180 days. The goal is to understand the effectiveness of once-weekly insulin icodec against standard daily basal insulins in real-world clinical practice over about 13 months. Participants will receive either insulin icodec once a week or one of the daily basal insulin analogues, such as insulin glargine, insulin detemir, or insulin degludec. Both treatments are given by subcutaneous injection. The choice between weekly or daily insulin is based on current treatment standards for type 2 diabetes. The study lasts approximately 52 weeks, during which participants maintain their assigned insulin regimen. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in participants' blood sugar control using the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test from the start until week 52. Participants will have their HbA1c measured within 90 days before starting the treatment. Safety and any reactions to the insulin will also be tracked. The study aims to assess how well the weekly insulin icodec works compared to daily basal insulins in managing blood sugar over a year.

Researchers are studying metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients whose tumors have a BRAFV600E mutation, which is known to have a poorer outlook compared to non-mutated cases. Standard treatments after the first therapy have shown limited success, with low response rates and short survival times. This study aims to understand how the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab works in real-world settings, focusing on effectiveness, quality of life, safety, and tolerability in German, Austrian, and Swiss patients who have already received prior therapies. Participants will receive encorafenib combined with cetuximab, treatments that target specific cancer mutations. This study is observational and non-interventional, meaning it records how patients respond to these drugs in routine care without altering their treatment. The study allows initial retrospective data collection and will follow patients longitudinally to gather comprehensive information about their experiences with the therapy. During the study, patients will be monitored for overall survival twelve months after starting treatment. Researchers will assess how well the treatment controls the cancer, side effects experienced, and patients' quality of life. Data will be collected from medical records and patient reports in regular clinical care, providing insights into the real-life use and impact of encorafenib and cetuximab for this patient group.

Researchers are investigating whether the medicine vicadrostat, when taken together with empagliflozin, can lower the risk of heart-related problems in adults who have type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease but no history of heart failure. This study is a Phase III trial that compares the effects of vicadrostat plus empagliflozin to a placebo plus empagliflozin in people with these conditions. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group takes vicadrostat and empagliflozin tablets, and the other group takes placebo tablets that look like vicadrostat along with empagliflozin. All participants take one tablet daily for a period ranging from two and a half years up to four years and three months. Throughout the study, participants continue their usual medications for diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. During up to 51 months of participation, participants visit the study site regularly where doctors collect health information and blood samples. Researchers track when participants experience cardiovascular events such as heart-related deaths or heart failure events. The study also monitors participants’ overall health and any side effects they may experience to assess the safety and effects of the treatments.

The trial investigates the use of a low stable pressure approach with the AirSeal Insufflator during colorectal surgery to improve recovery outcomes. This prospective international cohort study focuses on patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic colonic or rectal resections for benign or malignant conditions. The goal is to incorporate this approach into early rehabilitation to reduce hospitalization length, postoperative pain, and opioid use. Patients will have surgeries performed under low stable pressure pneumoperitoneum using the AirSeal device. The study considers multiple factors influencing recovery, including use of humidified and warmed gas, surgical techniques, patient positioning, and individual characteristics like obesity. These factors are evaluated collectively to optimize the benefits of low-pressure laparoscopy during colorectal procedures. Participants will be monitored from surgery through hospitalization, with assessments focusing on length of stay up to 30 days postoperatively. Researchers will track recovery progress, pain levels, and analgesic consumption. This comprehensive follow-up aims to understand how the low stable pressure approach impacts early rehabilitation and overall postoperative recovery.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world clinical use and outcomes of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who are treated with a combination of olaparib and abiraterone. The study focuses on patients who have either not previously received next-generation hormonal agents (NHA-naive) or who have been exposed to NHAs before starting this combined treatment. This prospective observational study aims to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatments before and after olaparib plus abiraterone therapy. The study will enroll patients who have started treatment with olaparib plus abiraterone after the study site became active. It will follow patients for up to 2 years to collect data on their treatment experience. No experimental interventions are administered as part of the study; instead, it observes patients receiving standard treatment in routine clinical settings. Participants will be monitored from the start of olaparib treatment until one year after the last patient enrolls. Researchers will collect clinical data to assess treatment discontinuation times and overall outcomes during this period. The study will capture information on patients’ clinical progress and any subsequent therapies, providing insights into the real-world effectiveness and use of this treatment combination.

Researchers are studying the use of venetoclax in people with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to understand how effective it is and to assess the costs and patient-reported outcomes when used in real-life medical settings. The study looks at venetoclax given alone or combined with rituximab, obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib, based on doctors' decisions and local treatment guidelines. Participants receive venetoclax therapy as prescribed by their physician, which may include the drug alone or along with one of the mentioned combination treatments. The study follows patients in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, observing how the treatments are used in everyday practice without altering the prescribed therapy. During the study, participants are monitored for up to 12 months to measure the percentage who achieve the best overall response rate (ORR) to treatment. Researchers also collect data on health economics and patient experiences to better understand the impact of these therapies in routine care.