Kronach

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are investigating the effects of a medicine called BI 690517 in combination with empagliflozin for adults with chronic kidney disease who are at risk of their condition worsening. This study includes people both with and without type 2 diabetes and those already taking certain kidney-related medicines like ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. The goal is to understand if adding BI 690517 helps protect kidney function and reduces risks related to kidney failure and heart problems. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial conducted over about 3 to 4 years. The study has two parts. First, participants receive either empagliflozin or a placebo similar to BI 690517 for at least six weeks, while continuing other indicated treatments like ACE inhibitors or ARBs. In the second part, participants are randomly assigned to take either BI 690517 tablets or placebo tablets once daily alongside empagliflozin for the rest of the study. The placebo tablets look like BI 690517 but contain no active medicine. Participants have regular visits to the study site, about four times in the first six months, then every six months afterward. During these visits, doctors monitor kidney function, heart health, blood pressure, weight, and any side effects. Blood and urine samples are taken to track health changes. The main outcomes measured are the time until worsening kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death. The study ends when a certain number of these events have occurred.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare blood disorder where the immune system causes a shortage of platelets, leading to increased bleeding risk. New treatment options have emerged recently, but clinical studies often focus on specific patient groups. This research collects real-world data from a broad range of ITP patients to better understand the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in everyday care. The study also aims to improve personalized therapy and patient results by gathering detailed clinical and biospecimen information. The study involves creating a national registry where clinical data and biospecimens are collected from patients diagnosed with primary or secondary ITP. Data are gathered prospectively at defined points during the disease course, and patients can also be included retrospectively within 12 months of diagnosis if ongoing documentation is available. This includes information about disease factors, treatment types, complications, quality of life, fatigue, and survival over 5 years. Participants will provide written consent and undergo clinical assessments at enrollment and follow-up visits. Researchers will collect epidemiological data such as disease incidence, age and sex distribution, causes, treatment types, and remission status over 5 years. The registry also includes biospecimen collection to support high-quality, standardized research. This ongoing monitoring will help improve knowledge of ITP and support better patient care.

Researchers are studying the use of venetoclax in people with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to understand how effective it is and to assess the costs and patient-reported outcomes when used in real-life medical settings. The study looks at venetoclax given alone or combined with rituximab, obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib, based on doctors' decisions and local treatment guidelines. Participants receive venetoclax therapy as prescribed by their physician, which may include the drug alone or along with one of the mentioned combination treatments. The study follows patients in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, observing how the treatments are used in everyday practice without altering the prescribed therapy. During the study, participants are monitored for up to 12 months to measure the percentage who achieve the best overall response rate (ORR) to treatment. Researchers also collect data on health economics and patient experiences to better understand the impact of these therapies in routine care.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a subcutaneous cladribine treatment for patients with hairy cell leukemia who need therapy. This study focuses on patients who are either untreated or have only been pretreated with alpha-interferon. It aims to assess remission rates four months after treatment and whether a second cycle benefits those with a non-optimal response, defined by residual disease or partial remission. Participants receive cladribine 0.14 mg/kg as a subcutaneous bolus injection once daily for five consecutive days. If the response after the first cycle is not optimal, patients may receive a second cycle of the drug to improve their remission status. This treatment approach is being studied in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial setting. During the study, remission status is evaluated four months after the first treatment cycle. Patients undergo assessments to detect residual disease in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Researchers monitor the rate of complete remissions and any treatment-related toxicities. The overall health, laboratory tests, and disease markers are regularly checked throughout the study period to ensure safety and to measure the treatment's impact.