Landshut

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a common and aggressive form of leukemia. This phase 3, open-label, randomized study aims to compare a triple combination therapy of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (GAVe) against a double combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) to see which better prolongs progression-free survival (PFS). High risk CLL patients are identified by specific genetic risk factors such as 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype, or unmutated IGHV gene status, which indicate a poorer prognosis and less response to chemotherapy. Participants receive fixed-duration treatments. The triple combination group receives obinutuzumab via intravenous infusion during cycles 1 through 6, venetoclax orally with a gradual dose ramp-up from cycle 1 to 12, and acalabrutinib orally twice daily during cycles 15 to 24. The comparison group receives obinutuzumab and venetoclax on the same schedules but without acalabrutinib. The study investigates how adding the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib to the existing combination may improve outcomes by targeting different pathways and reducing early disease progression. During the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival over 50 months after the first patient is included. Researchers assess clinical status, laboratory tests, and genetic markers to evaluate response and safety. The study also tracks liver and kidney function, infection status, and adverse events to ensure treatment tolerability. The total duration includes initial treatment cycles and extended follow-up to measure the long-term effectiveness of these therapies in high risk CLL patients.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of camizestrant compared to standard endocrine therapy in patients with early breast cancer that is estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-). These patients have an intermediate or high risk of cancer recurrence and have already completed local treatments such as surgery and possibly chemotherapy, alongside at least 2 years and up to 5 years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy. The study is a Phase III, open-label trial designed to assess outcomes over a long term. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either camizestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, or one of several standard endocrine therapies including tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane, administered according to local approved guidelines. The treatment duration for both groups is planned to last 60 months. Eligible patients may have previously used CDK4/6 inhibitors, and the study will specifically include those with intermediate or high risk of recurrence as determined by clinical and biological markers. During the study, participants will be monitored for up to 10 years from the last patient's randomization to evaluate invasive breast cancer-free survival. Additional outcomes include invasive disease-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, safety, and clinical outcome assessments. The study involves ongoing assessments of health status, treatment effects, and safety to determine the long-term benefits and risks of camizestrant compared to standard therapies.

Researchers are evaluating nemtabrutinib compared with the investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received any prior therapy. This Phase 3 study aims to determine if nemtabrutinib is not worse than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in terms of objective response rate and if it is better regarding progression-free survival, both assessed using standardized disease criteria by independent review. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three oral treatments: nemtabrutinib, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib. The study compares the effectiveness of nemtabrutinib against the other two drugs chosen by the investigator to treat first-line CLL/SLL. Treatment continues with monitoring over months to assess response and disease progression. During the study, participants will undergo evaluations based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria, including blinded independent central reviews of their disease status. Researchers will track objective response rates up to about 33 months and progression-free survival up to around 104 months. Participants will also be monitored for safety and treatment adherence throughout the trial period.

This trial investigates the effectiveness of Pumitamig compared to Pembrolizumab in adults with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior treatment and whose tumors express PD-L1 at 50% or higher. The study targets individuals with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, focusing on those with measurable disease and good performance status. It is a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study designed to compare these two treatments as first-line options for this patient group. Participants will receive either Pumitamig or Pembrolizumab at specified doses on scheduled days. The treatments are given as monotherapy, meaning each participant receives only one of these drugs throughout the study. The study does not mention additional treatment phases or extensions, focusing on the direct comparison of these two drugs for initial treatment. Throughout the study, researchers will assess how long participants live without their cancer worsening, using standardized criteria over about three years. Overall survival will also be tracked for up to five years. Participants will be monitored regularly to evaluate their response to treatment and overall health. Safety and effectiveness outcomes will be gathered through medical assessments consistent with clinical trial standards for NSCLC.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with generalized Mantle Cell Lymphoma in this Phase 3 trial. The study aims to identify one of three treatment approaches as a future standard by comparing failure-free survival, which measures the time from treatment start until stable disease, disease progression, or death. Secondary goals include assessing overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, safety, and tolerability of the treatments, as well as exploring factors like minimal residual disease and stem cell mobilization. Participants receive one of three treatment plans: the control arm with alternating R-CHOP and R-DHAP chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); an experimental arm adding ibrutinib during induction and maintenance with ASCT; or an experimental arm with ibrutinib during induction and maintenance without ASCT. Chemotherapy includes drugs such as rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, dexamethasone, Ara-C, and cisplatin. Ibrutinib is given in certain induction cycles and as daily maintenance for two years. ASCT conditioning uses specific chemotherapy regimens or total body irradiation depending on the site. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging, laboratory tests, and evaluations of response and side effects. Researchers monitor failure-free survival up to 10 years, along with secondary outcomes like overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety events. Follow-up includes measuring molecular remission, relapse timing, and quality of life. The total duration includes treatment, maintenance, and long-term observation, with safety and efficacy carefully tracked throughout.

Researchers are investigating the real-world use, effectiveness, quality of life impact, safety, and tolerability of the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic melanoma that has a specific BRAF V600 mutation. This prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional study focuses on patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland who receive these drugs after they became commercially available. The study includes patients receiving first or second line treatment, particularly after prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The study observes patients treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib according to approved prescribing guidelines (Summary of Product Characteristics). Patients may have started treatment within six months before joining the study or plan to start soon. No experimental interventions are given; instead, the study collects real-life treatment data under routine clinical care in multiple centers across the three countries. Participants will be followed to gather information on progression-free survival at 12 months after starting treatment. Data collected include safety, tolerability, quality of life, and treatment patterns. The study documents patient outcomes and treatment experiences in a naturalistic setting without altering standard care. Participation duration depends on treatment and follow-up schedules determined by routine clinical practice and study timelines.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of bomedemstat compared to hydroxyurea in people diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET) who have not yet received cytoreductive therapy but need it. This Phase 3 study aims to determine if bomedemstat leads to a better lasting clinicohematologic response than hydroxyurea in these patients. Participants will receive either oral bomedemstat capsules or oral hydroxyurea capsules, with placebos used to maintain the study's double-blind design. The study compares these two treatments to see which better manages ET with a focus on sustained treatment response. The treatments are taken as capsules, but specific dosing schedules are not detailed in the available information. During the study, researchers will monitor participants up to 52 weeks to measure their durable clinicohematologic response. Participants will undergo regular assessments to evaluate treatment effects and safety. The study includes safety monitoring and collects data on how well patients respond to the therapies over time, ensuring comprehensive evaluation of both treatments.

Researchers are investigating the use of ribociclib combined with standard endocrine therapy as a first-line treatment for women with advanced hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-) breast cancer. This phase IV, open-label, single-arm study aims to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 12 months, along with quality of life, treatment toxicity, and comprehensive biomarker analysis to understand patterns of treatment efficacy and resistance. Participants will receive ribociclib orally at a dose of 600 mg daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off, in 28-day cycles, combined with standard endocrine therapy according to current guidelines and local practice. The study includes extensive biomarker sampling before, during, and after treatment or at disease progression, including blood, tissue, and immune cell analyses to support translational research. During the trial, patients will attend scheduled visits for monitoring and assessments including survival status, safety evaluations, and quality of life questionnaires. Biomarker samples such as circulating tumor DNA and RNA, serum, plasma, and tumor tissue will be collected to evaluate biological changes. The trial plans to enroll 1000 female patients across 75 sites in Germany, with comprehensive follow-up to track treatment outcomes and long-term safety.

Researchers are investigating the effects of a medicine called BI 690517 in combination with empagliflozin for adults with chronic kidney disease who are at risk of their condition worsening. This study includes people both with and without type 2 diabetes and those already taking certain kidney-related medicines like ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. The goal is to understand if adding BI 690517 helps protect kidney function and reduces risks related to kidney failure and heart problems. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial conducted over about 3 to 4 years. The study has two parts. First, participants receive either empagliflozin or a placebo similar to BI 690517 for at least six weeks, while continuing other indicated treatments like ACE inhibitors or ARBs. In the second part, participants are randomly assigned to take either BI 690517 tablets or placebo tablets once daily alongside empagliflozin for the rest of the study. The placebo tablets look like BI 690517 but contain no active medicine. Participants have regular visits to the study site, about four times in the first six months, then every six months afterward. During these visits, doctors monitor kidney function, heart health, blood pressure, weight, and any side effects. Blood and urine samples are taken to track health changes. The main outcomes measured are the time until worsening kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death. The study ends when a certain number of these events have occurred.