Monchengladbach

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating asthma control, health-related quality of life (HRQL), lung function, and asthma medication use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab in a real-life clinical setting in Germany. This prospective, non-interventional, single-arm, multicenter study aims to observe these outcomes over a 52-week period to better understand benralizumab's impact outside of randomized clinical trials. Patients prescribed benralizumab according to label and local reimbursement criteria will be followed for up to 52 weeks. The study will monitor asthma control using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ®) at various timepoints. Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniAQLQ) at baseline and routine follow-up visits. Patients will also track and report their weekly asthma medication intake using either paper-based or electronic diaries throughout the study. Participants will complete questionnaires every 4 weeks and record medication intake weekly. Researchers will measure changes in ACT scores, proportions of responders, and reductions in inhaled corticosteroid doses from baseline to weeks 12, 24, and 52. Safety and health outcomes will be observed under routine clinical care. This study includes adults aged 18 to 120 years with severe eosinophilic asthma who can understand study instructions and provide informed consent.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a common and aggressive form of leukemia. This phase 3, open-label, randomized study aims to compare a triple combination therapy of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (GAVe) against a double combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) to see which better prolongs progression-free survival (PFS). High risk CLL patients are identified by specific genetic risk factors such as 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype, or unmutated IGHV gene status, which indicate a poorer prognosis and less response to chemotherapy. Participants receive fixed-duration treatments. The triple combination group receives obinutuzumab via intravenous infusion during cycles 1 through 6, venetoclax orally with a gradual dose ramp-up from cycle 1 to 12, and acalabrutinib orally twice daily during cycles 15 to 24. The comparison group receives obinutuzumab and venetoclax on the same schedules but without acalabrutinib. The study investigates how adding the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib to the existing combination may improve outcomes by targeting different pathways and reducing early disease progression. During the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival over 50 months after the first patient is included. Researchers assess clinical status, laboratory tests, and genetic markers to evaluate response and safety. The study also tracks liver and kidney function, infection status, and adverse events to ensure treatment tolerability. The total duration includes initial treatment cycles and extended follow-up to measure the long-term effectiveness of these therapies in high risk CLL patients.

Researchers are conducting a global study to understand the impact of moderate to severe alopecia areata (AA), non-segmental vitiligo (NSV), and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on adolescents and adults. This study aims to assess the burden these conditions place on patients' quality of life and daily functioning in a large real-world population. The study involves participants diagnosed by a physician with one of the three conditions: AA, NSV, or HS. There are no interventional treatments or medications being tested in this study, as it is observational in nature. Data collection focuses on patient-reported outcomes and measures that evaluate disease severity and its effects. Participants will complete various questionnaires and assessments related to their condition, such as the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS) for AA, the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) for scalp hair loss in AA, the Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) and Vitiligo Quality of Life Score (VitiQoL) for vitiligo, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4) for HS. These tools help researchers understand how symptoms affect quality of life and disease severity. The study collects information up to the day of the study visit.

Researchers are evaluating how well elacestrant works compared to standard endocrine therapy in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who are at high risk of the cancer returning. This is a Phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focusing on participants who have had early invasive breast cancer removed and meet specific receptor and risk criteria. The study aims to understand which treatment better prevents invasive breast cancer over up to five years. Participants will receive either elacestrant or one of several standard endocrine therapies, including anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen, all given as oral tablets. Treatments will be administered according to the study plan, with careful monitoring throughout the trial. The study includes adults who have already received between 24 and 60 months of prior endocrine therapy, with or without certain inhibitors, and who have completed or stopped these treatments as required. During the study, participants will be monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform regular assessments to track treatment effects, side effects, and cancer recurrence. The study also includes safety monitoring and may involve additional tests or evaluations as needed to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating nemtabrutinib compared with the investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received any prior therapy. This Phase 3 study aims to determine if nemtabrutinib is not worse than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in terms of objective response rate and if it is better regarding progression-free survival, both assessed using standardized disease criteria by independent review. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three oral treatments: nemtabrutinib, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib. The study compares the effectiveness of nemtabrutinib against the other two drugs chosen by the investigator to treat first-line CLL/SLL. Treatment continues with monitoring over months to assess response and disease progression. During the study, participants will undergo evaluations based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria, including blinded independent central reviews of their disease status. Researchers will track objective response rates up to about 33 months and progression-free survival up to around 104 months. Participants will also be monitored for safety and treatment adherence throughout the trial period.

This is a Phase III, randomized, open-label multicenter study that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of giredestrant compared with fulvestrant, both in combination with the investigator's choice of a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib), in participants with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who have developed resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy.

WAYFIND-R is a global registry focused on collecting high-quality real-world data from cancer patients diagnosed with solid tumors who have undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. The registry aims to support clinical and epidemiological research, generate evidence to better understand health outcomes and cancer care, and describe treatments and clinical courses for these patients. Participants must be adults diagnosed with any type of solid tumor at any disease stage and have had NGS testing within three months before enrollment. The study collects data without assigning specific treatments or interventions, instead tracking clinical characteristics and outcomes over time. During the study, researchers will gather information linking NGS results to treatments and patient outcomes, including overall survival for up to five years from enrollment. Participants provide informed consent, and data collected will help improve understanding of solid tumor cancers and their management in real-world settings.

This research aims to evaluate the safety, performance, and usability of Occlutech accessory medical devices used in cardiac implant procedures. It is an international, multicenter, non-randomized, non-invasive registry study focusing on devices such as the Occlutech Delivery Set (ODS), Occlutech Pistol Pusher (OPP), Occlutech Occlusions-Pusher (OOP), and Occlutech Sizing Balloon (OSB). The study collects data through investigator-completed surveys to monitor device-related outcomes during and after catheter-based cardiac implant interventions. The study involves the use of the specified Occlutech accessory devices by experienced physicians skilled in cardiac catheterization and interventional operations. Investigators complete detailed questionnaires assessing the success of implantation procedures, any adverse events occurring during or after the procedures, user harm related to the accessories, and any device deficiencies. The surveys also evaluate performance, usability, and compatibility of the accessories with other devices. Participants are treated following the implants' and accessories' instructions for use and standard clinical practice. Participants' involvement includes undergoing implantation procedures with these accessory devices, after which investigators collect data via surveys. The study monitors safety events over six months, including any adverse outcomes linked to the accessories or procedures. The collected information helps assess the devices' safety profile and practical use in real-world clinical settings. The total duration of monitoring and follow-up is six months per participant to capture both immediate and longer-term effects.

Researchers are studying metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients whose tumors have a BRAFV600E mutation, which is known to have a poorer outlook compared to non-mutated cases. Standard treatments after the first therapy have shown limited success, with low response rates and short survival times. This study aims to understand how the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab works in real-world settings, focusing on effectiveness, quality of life, safety, and tolerability in German, Austrian, and Swiss patients who have already received prior therapies. Participants will receive encorafenib combined with cetuximab, treatments that target specific cancer mutations. This study is observational and non-interventional, meaning it records how patients respond to these drugs in routine care without altering their treatment. The study allows initial retrospective data collection and will follow patients longitudinally to gather comprehensive information about their experiences with the therapy. During the study, patients will be monitored for overall survival twelve months after starting treatment. Researchers will assess how well the treatment controls the cancer, side effects experienced, and patients' quality of life. Data will be collected from medical records and patient reports in regular clinical care, providing insights into the real-life use and impact of encorafenib and cetuximab for this patient group.