Munchen

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of elenestinib (BLU-263) combined with symptom-directed therapy (SDT) compared to placebo plus SDT in people with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) whose symptoms are not well controlled by SDT alone. This Phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study includes participants with ISM and smoldering systemic mastocytosis, and also involves groups for pharmacokinetic studies and participants who previously received a selective KIT inhibitor. The study is divided into multiple parts. Parts 1 and 2 enroll participants with ISM who will receive either elenestinib oral tablets or placebo alongside their symptom-directed therapy. Participants from Part 2 may continue into Part 3, which is an open-label extension where all receive elenestinib. Part K enrolls participants with ISM who have prior experience with selective KIT inhibitors. The study tracks treatment effects and safety over time. Participants will be monitored for up to 5 years, with assessments including the number of treatment-emergent adverse events, changes in symptom scores measured by the ISM-Symptom in Assessment Form, and overall safety monitoring. Evaluations occur at baseline, 13 weeks, 49 weeks, and throughout the long-term follow-up. The study also includes detailed tracking of symptom control and adverse events to evaluate the impact of treatment on participants' health and quality of life.

Researchers are evaluating a non-invasive brain stimulation method using 40 Hz visual flickering light to address negative symptoms like cognitive dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. This pilot study involves at least ten patients with predominant negative symptoms, comparing those receiving the visual stimulation intervention to a treatment-as-usual control group. The goal is to explore the feasibility of this approach as an add-on treatment for schizophrenia. The intervention group will receive five daily sessions of 40 Hz visual stimulation, each lasting one hour, delivered through a customized sleep mask with red LEDs flickering at 40 Hz. Participants will wear the mask with their eyes closed and be encouraged to fall asleep during stimulation. EEG recordings will be taken during the first and last sessions to measure neuronal responses. The control group will continue their usual treatment without receiving the stimulation but will complete the same assessments. Participants will undergo pre- and post-assessments including EEG, cognitive testing with the THINC-IT battery, mood evaluation using the PANAS scale, and psychiatric symptom rating with PANSS by their physician. Safety will be monitored by asking about adverse events after each stimulation session. The primary outcomes focus on visually evoked neuronal activity at 40 Hz measured during the first and last stimulation days. The study will provide data on brain activity changes and symptom effects over the course of the five-day intervention.

Researchers are working to create a comprehensive reference database focused on intracranial aneurysms (IA). This project aims to gather detailed clinical history, imaging data, biological samples, and other related information to better understand risk markers for aneurysm formation and rupture, along with prognostic factors for different management strategies. The study also seeks to develop patient-specific management protocols and assess how the database and its tools can improve care, reduce costs, and support new discoveries and industrial developments. Participants include patients with newly diagnosed or known intracranial aneurysms, healthy volunteers, and family members of patients with a familial history of IA. Data collected includes demographic details, medical history, imaging scans such as MRI angiography and CT angiography, and various biological samples like blood, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, and stool. Participants are asked to provide consent for data and sample use, including genetic analysis and potential future research applications. There are no limits on the number of participants for this database. During the study, participants will provide access to their health records, complete questionnaires, and undergo imaging and sample collection. Researchers will track clinical outcomes, imaging results, and quality of life measures over time. The primary outcome is disease model validation over 5 years. Consent includes provisions for confidentiality, withdrawal without impact on care, and possible re-contact for additional information or consent. The study ensures safety through ethical oversight and insurance coverage for any direct harm related to participation.

This research aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary effectiveness of [90Y]Y-PentixaTher ([90Y]Y-PTT) in treating patients with recurrent or refractory primary or isolated secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. This phase 1/2 open-label study includes patients with confirmed relapsed or refractory CNS lymphoma and focuses on assessing the treatment's safety profile, distribution in the body, and initial efficacy signals. Patients must show presence of CXCR4 on tumor lesions verified by a PET scan prior to enrollment. Participants will receive one cycle of [90Y]Y-PTT administered through an intravenous injection. The study uses a dose escalation design across three cohorts to find the best dose, with a safety review committee monitoring toxicities to guide dose adjustments. There is no comparator group. The core study phase includes five visits during which safety, biodistribution, dosimetry, and efficacy are closely evaluated. Following the core phase, participants will have three follow-up visits spaced three months apart to monitor disease status. Researchers will track adverse events graded by standard criteria from screening until the last follow-up visit, with serious adverse events after the study reported only if linked to the study drug. Overall, patient involvement includes detailed clinical assessments, imaging, blood tests, and ongoing safety monitoring over the study and follow-up periods.

This research aims to evaluate the effects of litifilimab (BIIB059), a monoclonal antibody, in adults with active subacute or chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants have active skin symptoms of CLE that have not improved with antimalarial therapy or had difficulties continuing that treatment. The study focuses on reducing skin disease activity using several scores including CLA-IGA-R and CLASI, while also assessing safety, immune response, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab or a placebo injection under the skin every four weeks during a 24-week double-blind period where neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. After this, all participants will receive litifilimab injections every four weeks for an additional 28 weeks. Those who complete the treatment may join a long-term extension study or enter a follow-up safety period lasting up to 24 weeks. Total participation may last up to 80 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor skin disease activity using the CLA-IGA-R erythema score and the CLASI-A activity score to see how many participants improve. They will also assess safety, tolerability, immune system effects, and participants' quality of life using questionnaires. These evaluations occur regularly during both treatment periods and follow-up to understand the impact of litifilimab on CLE symptoms and overall health.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are evaluating new treatments for people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC), a type of bladder cancer that has not spread to the muscle but has a high chance of worsening or returning. This cancer type may include carcinoma in situ (CIS), which is a flat, surface-level bladder cancer. The study aims to learn whether adding intismeran autogene (V940), a treatment designed to boost the immune system's attack on cancer, to the standard Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy can help people live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back. Participants will receive either the combination of V940 with BCG or BCG alone. BCG is given as a bladder instillation, while V940 is given as an intramuscular injection. The study is phase 2, open-label, and randomized. As of a 2026 amendment, outcome measures for a monotherapy arm of V940 are no longer primary or secondary. Treatment is focused on Cohort A, which includes people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who are BCG-naïve or meet specific recurrence criteria. During the study, participants will be monitored for event-free survival for up to approximately 5 years. Researchers will assess how long participants live without the cancer worsening or returning. The study includes regular evaluations, imaging, and safety monitoring. The total duration of participation depends on individual outcomes and follow-up but includes long-term observation to assess treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating tulisokibart as a potential treatment for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), a type of arthritis causing pain, stiffness, and inflammation in the spine and pelvis joints, visible on X-rays. This Phase 2b study aims to determine if different doses of tulisokibart improve symptoms better than a placebo, which looks like the study medicine but contains no active drug. The study has two main parts: a 16-week placebo-controlled period where participants receive either tulisokibart or placebo through subcutaneous injections, followed by a 124-week long-term extension divided into a 40-week main extension and an 84-week optional extension. This allows researchers to assess both the short-term and longer-term effects and safety of tulisokibart. Participants will be monitored for their response using the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 16 as the primary outcome. Throughout the study, researchers will evaluate disease activity and safety while tracking symptoms and any side effects. The total involvement spans up to 140 weeks, including both initial treatment and extension phases.

Researchers are studying oligodendrogliomas, a type of brain tumor identified by specific genetic changes such as IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and 1p/19q co-deletion. These tumors are classified as CNS WHO grade 2 or 3, and the study aims to determine the best treatment approach to improve survival while preserving brain function and quality of life. This phase 3 trial compares current standard treatments because existing data is unclear about the best timing and combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for these tumors. The study compares two treatment approaches for adults with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 oligodendrogliomas. One group receives an initial chemotherapy regimen of lomustine and temozolomide (CETEG) with delayed radiotherapy plus PCV chemotherapy at progression. The other group receives standard radiotherapy followed by PCV chemotherapy. Radiotherapy doses vary based on tumor grade. The study plans to assess if delaying radiotherapy and adjusting chemotherapy can maintain survival while reducing side effects. Participants will undergo regular monitoring including MRI scans every three months, neurological assessments, quality of life questionnaires, and annual cognitive testing. Researchers will measure qualified overall survival, defined as survival without decline in function, cognition, or quality of life. The study will last up to 10 years, with close tracking of side effects, tumor response, and patients' well-being to determine the best balance of treatment effectiveness and quality of life.