Offenbach Am Main

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are studying the real-world effectiveness of pegcetacoplan in patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH). This long-term, multicenter observational study aims to fill knowledge gaps about how pegcetacoplan works in routine medical practice. It also seeks to provide important information on red blood cell transfusions and healthcare resource use before and after starting pegcetacoplan treatment. Patients who have started pegcetacoplan treatment within the last 12 months or are prescribed it at enrollment will be followed for approximately 36 months. The study will collect both retrospective data from up to 12 months before treatment start and prospective data during treatment, with a total data collection period of up to about 48 months. After stopping pegcetacoplan, patients will remain in the study for 8 weeks to monitor for any adverse events. Participants will attend their usual medical visits, and data from these visits will be collected, including effectiveness measures, safety reports, patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, and healthcare use. The primary outcome includes changes in hemoglobin levels over 6 months from the start of pegcetacoplan treatment. The study plans to enroll about 200 patients across multiple countries, and data collection includes both retrospective and prospective periods, capturing comprehensive information on pegcetacoplan use in real-world settings.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

This research aims to evaluate how well brenipatide (LY3537031) is tolerated, what side effects may occur, and its safety and effectiveness in adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D). The study focuses on participants who meet specific IBS-D criteria related to bowel movement patterns and abdominal pain. It is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial lasting approximately 35 weeks. Participants will receive either brenipatide or a placebo, both administered under the skin through subcutaneous injection. The treatments are compared to assess their impact on IBS-D symptoms. The study involves careful monitoring of patients' responses to the medication over the treatment period, with no changes in diet allowed in the four weeks before screening. During the study, participants will track their symptoms daily using an electronic diary, including abdominal pain and stool consistency. Researchers will measure the percentage of days participants have a positive composite response between weeks 9 and 16. Safety and side effects will be monitored throughout the study, ensuring participants are closely observed during the full duration of about 35 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of brenipatide compared to a placebo in adults with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and hazardous alcohol use. This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study aims to understand if brenipatide can help participants reduce or stop drinking. The study lasts approximately 56 weeks and focuses on changes in drinking patterns using the Timeline Followback Method (TLFB). Participants will receive either brenipatide (LY3537031) or a placebo, both administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants who cannot self-inject will have assistance from a trained support person. They are expected to store and use the blinded study drug as directed, maintain electronic and paper diaries, and complete questionnaires throughout the study. During the study, participants will have scheduled visits to monitor their progress, including assessments of drinking behavior and safety evaluations. Researchers will measure changes in alcohol use patterns up to 56 weeks. Participants must be motivated to reduce or stop drinking and be available for all study visits and procedures. Safety and adherence will be closely monitored throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of brenipatide compared to a placebo for adults with moderate-to-severe Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). This phase 3 study aims to better understand if brenipatide can help reduce drinking in this population. Participants will be followed for about 56 weeks to gather comprehensive information. Participants will receive either brenipatide (LY3537031) or a placebo, both given by subcutaneous injection. The study involves a randomized, double-blind design, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know who receives which treatment during the trial. This method helps provide reliable results about the effects and safety of brenipatide. During the study, participants will attend scheduled visits, self-inject the study drug, and complete electronic and paper diaries as well as questionnaires. Researchers will monitor changes in drinking patterns using the Timeline Followback Method for up to 56 weeks. Safety monitoring and regular assessments will be performed throughout the study to track participants' health and adherence.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of orforglipron, taken once daily, in people who are overweight or have obesity and also suffer from knee osteoarthritis with pain. This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to understand how well orforglipron works over about 74 weeks. The study is part of a larger master protocol supporting two independent studies focused on this condition and population. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo, both administered orally. The study compares these two groups in a parallel-arm design to assess treatment effects. The trial includes a long treatment and observation period lasting about 74 weeks to monitor changes and safety outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be assessed for changes in their knee pain using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale, measured at the start and at week 72. Researchers will also monitor the participants' safety and overall health during the trial. The participation duration is approximately 74 weeks, including screening, treatment, and follow-up visits.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of brenipatide at different doses compared with a placebo in adults with uncontrolled moderate to severe asthma. This Phase 2 study focuses on participants who have a history of asthma requiring controller medication and recent severe asthma exacerbations. The goal is to better understand how brenipatide impacts asthma control over an extended period. Participants will receive either brenipatide or a placebo, both administered by subcutaneous injection. The study includes a 52-week treatment period during which the effects of the drug on asthma exacerbations and symptoms will be monitored. This randomized, double-blind approach helps compare the responses between the treatment and placebo groups. Study involvement lasts about 65 weeks, covering screening, treatment, and follow-up phases. During the study, researchers will assess participants' asthma control using questionnaires and track the annual rate of asthma exacerbations. Safety and treatment responses will be closely monitored throughout the trial to evaluate the drug's impact and participant well-being.