Offenburg

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan T-DXd as a treatment for adult patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction GEJ adenocarcinoma who have previously received a trastuzumab-based regimen. This study aims to assess the real-world effectiveness of T-DXd, patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and safety in this population. It also includes data collection on patients receiving conventional therapies for exploratory comparison. This is a non-interventional observational study where patients receive T-DXd or conventional therapies as part of routine clinical care according to approved guidelines SmPC. No investigational drugs are given. The study tracks patients starting T-DXd as a second-line or later treatment and collects data on other therapies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy used in clinical practice. Participants will be followed for up to approximately 2 years from baseline to monitor outcomes including time to next treatment, changes in treatment, physician-reported safety events, use of prophylactic treatments, and quality of life using validated questionnaires. Data on physician visits, treatment discontinuation, and safety events will also be collected to understand treatment tolerability and patient experience in a real-world setting.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness of asciminib in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase Ph CML-CP. This observational study compares patients who are newly diagnosed or previously treated with one ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor TKI to those treated with other TKIs. The study aims to assess tolerability, safety, and molecular response outcomes in routine clinical care. Participants are grouped into cohorts based on their treatment those receiving asciminib, those newly diagnosed treated with imatinib, and those newly diagnosed treated with second-generation TKIs such as dasatinib, bosutinib, or nilotinib. Treatment decisions are made by physicians prior to enrollment, and treatment must not have started more than 14 days before joining the study. The study follows patients over time to document treatment patterns, dose changes, interruptions, and discontinuations. Participants will attend routine follow-up visits and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessing medication adherence, quality of life, and work productivity at multiple time points up to 24 months. Researchers will measure major molecular response at 12 months as the primary outcome and evaluate various secondary molecular responses, reasons for treatment changes, and quality of life scores. The study duration extends through September 2030, allowing long-term observation of treatment effectiveness and safety.

Researchers are studying metastatic colorectal carcinoma mCRC patients who have a specific BRAFV600E mutation, which is linked to poorer outcomes compared to those without it. This mutation leads to shorter survival times after initial treatments, prompting the need for new therapy combinations. This research aims to observe how the drugs encorafenib and cetuximab work together in real-world settings for patients who have already received prior systemic therapies. This non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal study focuses on patients treated with encorafenib plus cetuximab following prior systemic therapy. The study collects data on treatment effectiveness, safety, and quality of life among a broader patient population in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Patients may have started treatment up to three months before joining the study or plan to start soon, and the study observes their outcomes without influencing treatment decisions. Participants will be monitored through data collection on their disease and treatment profiles, including patient and physician assessments, adverse events, and treatment details. The main outcome measured is overall survival at 12 months after starting treatment. Additional information gathered includes treatment duration, dose intensity, interruptions, and patient-reported quality of life using questionnaires. Safety and tolerability are also evaluated throughout treatment, with follow-up averaging nine months.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining two drugs, loncastuximab tesirine and epcoritamab, in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma DLBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma HGBL, and follicular lymphoma grade 3B. The study includes patients who have not received CAR-T cell therapy but failed first-line treatment, as well as those who have had CAR-T therapy and experienced failure. This is a phase II clinical trial aiming to assess toxicity and response rates in these patient groups. Participants receive loncastuximab tesirine intravenously with an initial dosing schedule followed by maintenance doses every 21 days in responding patients for up to six cycles. Epcoritamab is given as a subcutaneous injection with a step-up dosing during the first cycle, then weekly in cycles 2 and 3, biweekly in cycles 4 to 9, and monthly from cycle 10 to a maximum of 13 cycles. The trial includes a safety analysis after 20 patients start treatment and an interim efficacy analysis after 50 patients are recruited, with additional response assessments for CAR-T naive patients. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging by FDG-PETCT or MRI to evaluate tumor response, laboratory tests for organ function, and monitoring of adverse events up to 150 days after the last drug administration. The primary outcome is the best overall response rate measured 12 months after starting therapy. Secondary outcomes include progression-free and overall survival, response duration, and treatment-related safety events. The trial may last until April 2030, with 120 participants expected to be enrolled.

Researchers are evaluating whether systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy LNE improves overall survival in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer who have a high risk of recurrence. The trial also looks at how LNE affects disease-free survival, quality of life, complications, side effects, and the number of lymph nodes removed. A total of 640 patients with specific histological types and stages of endometrial cancer will take part in this study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In Arm A, patients will undergo the standard surgical procedure including total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with an omentectomy added for certain cancer types. In Arm B, patients will receive the same standard surgery plus systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy reaching up to the left renal vein. The study compares these two surgical approaches. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for overall survival over 60 months. Researchers will also assess disease-free and disease-specific survival at multiple time points up to five years. Serious complications will be recorded during surgery and follow-up visits. Quality of life will be evaluated regularly using standardized questionnaires. The number of lymph nodes removed will be documented during surgery to support the evaluation of treatment impact and safety.

This research aims to gather detailed data and biomaterials from adults diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALL and related diseases, including certain types of Leukemia and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. The registry supports ALL research and quality assurance by collecting information regardless of whether patients participate in clinical trials. The study is observational and involves adults diagnosed and treated under ALL protocols. Participants include adults aged 18 and older with ALL subtypes, other leukemias treated according to ALL protocols, and specific subtypes of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma treated under B-ALL protocols. The study collects data prospectively on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, along with biomaterials related to these conditions. Participants provide information during routine clinical care and follow-up visits for up to 10 years. Data collected includes survival rates, remission status assessed by various methods including PET scans, relapse rates, quality of life questionnaires, and monitoring of toxicities and comorbidities. The study tracks overall survival and other outcomes over long-term follow-up to support research and quality assurance in adult ALL and related diseases.

Immune thrombocytopenia ITP is a rare blood disorder caused by an autoimmune condition that reduces platelet counts, increasing the risk of bleeding or prolonged bleeding. New treatments for ITP have emerged recently, but existing clinical studies are limited in their applicability to everyday patient care due to strict criteria. This registry aims to collect real-world clinical data and biospecimens from patients with various types of ITP to improve understanding of diagnosis, therapy, and patient outcomes in routine treatment. The registry includes patients diagnosed with primary or secondary ITP who consent to participate. Data collection occurs at defined points in the disease course either prospectively or retrospectively up to 12 months after diagnosis, provided continuous documentation is available. Biospecimens are collected and stored systematically to support research. Clinical information collected includes disease characteristics, treatment types, complications, quality of life, fatigue scores, and survival data over a follow-up period of up to 5 years. Participants provide clinical data and biosamples at enrollment, then again at 6 months and annually for up to 5 years. Assessments include platelet counts, bleeding and thromboembolic events, laboratory markers such as specific antibodies, and patient-reported outcomes like quality of life and fatigue. The study gathers epidemiological data on incidence, age, sex distribution, causes of ITP, treatment received, and remission status. The registry helps advance knowledge about ITP through long-term monitoring and standardized data collection.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of two treatment strategies for patients newly diagnosed with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. This international, multicenter, randomized, open Phase III trial compares carboplatinpaclitaxel chemotherapy followed by niraparib alone versus carboplatinpaclitaxel combined with bevacizumab followed by both bevacizumab and niraparib. The study includes patients with high-grade, non-mucinous, non-clear cell epithelial tumors at specific advanced stages who have had surgery or plan chemotherapy with interval debulking surgery. All patients receive an initial cycle of carboplatin and paclitaxel before randomization. After central testing of tumor BRCA status, participants are randomly assigned to one of two arms Arm 1 continues with five more cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by daily niraparib for up to three years Arm 2 receives five cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab, then maintenance bevacizumab for up to one year alongside daily niraparib for up to three years. This design aims to determine if adding bevacizumab improves outcomes over the standard treatment. Participants undergo frequent assessments including scans and laboratory tests to monitor progression-free survival and other health outcomes. Researchers also evaluate overall survival, time to additional therapies, treatment-related side effects, and quality of life up to several years after enrollment. Patients attend regular visits for treatment, monitoring, and completion of questionnaires, with safety follow-up 30 days after the last dose. The entire observation period can last up to 66 months after the last patient joins the trial.

This research aims to evaluate the addition of venetoclax to standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy in adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts-2 MDS-EB-2. It is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 clinical trial preceded by a dose-escalation feasibility phase to establish the venetoclax dose. The study is conducted across multiple centers and sponsored by the University of Ulm. Participants first undergo a feasibility run-in phase where venetoclax dosing is determined. Then, eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either intensive chemotherapy combined with venetoclax or with a placebo. Treatment includes two cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation therapy based on initial randomization and established protocols. Patients achieving complete remission or certain other response states continue consolidation, and some may undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation or other treatments depending on clinical factors. During the study, participants receive detailed evaluations including assessments of treatment safety and effectiveness. Researchers monitor event-free survival, dose-limiting toxicities, remission rates, relapse, survival, and quality of life using questionnaires and laboratory testing. Treatment adherence and safety are closely tracked. The study follows participants until at least 16 months after the last patient is enrolled, with some outcome measures extending to 28 months, to gather comprehensive data on treatment impact and patient health.