Oldenburg Oldb

This trial evaluates the effectiveness of adjuvant cemiplimab immunotherapy in adults with surgically removed stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who have not previously received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The study aims to compare disease-free survival between patients treated with cemiplimab and those under observation without additional treatment, focusing on patients with tumors showing PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either cemiplimab or observation. Those in the cemiplimab group receive 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by 700 mg every 6 weeks for up to 6 cycles or until disease relapse or unacceptable side effects occur. The observation group does not receive adjuvant treatment. Treatment continues until relapse, toxicity, or completion of planned cycles. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging and laboratory tests to monitor disease status and side effects. The main outcome measured is disease-free survival, tracked for approximately 59 months from randomization. Secondary outcomes include overall survival and the nature and severity of adverse events. Participants are monitored for safety and treatment response throughout the study period, which is expected to conclude in March 2029.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express high levels of PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter global study focuses on patients with mNSCLC without certain genetic mutations who are suitable for this treatment approach. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two drugs over repeated treatment cycles as first-line therapy. Both treatments are biological agents given by infusion, and the study is designed to monitor their effects over up to approximately five years. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments including physical exams, imaging scans such as CT or MRI to measure tumor lesions, and laboratory tests to evaluate organ function. Researchers will closely monitor overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment response, duration of response, and patient-reported outcomes on physical functioning and quality of life. Safety and immunogenicity of rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants are followed and assessed for up to five years to gather comprehensive data on treatment effects and long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of elecoglipron, an oral tablet taken once daily, for weight management in adults with obesity or overweight. This Phase III global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial includes two independent pivotal studies one in adults without type 2 diabetes T2DM and the other in adults with T2DM, all having at least one weight-related health condition. The goal is to understand how elecoglipron compares to placebo when combined with diet and exercise. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one of two doses of elecoglipron or a matching placebo daily. Study 1 involves about 3000 adults living with obesity or overweight without T2DM, while Study 2 involves about 1500 adults with obesity or overweight and T2DM. Both studies last 72 weeks, during which changes in body weight and other health measures will be monitored. During the trial, participants will undergo regular health assessments including measurements of body weight, waist circumference, blood sugar control, blood pressure, and other related health indicators. Researchers will track percent change in body weight from baseline at 72 weeks as the primary outcome. Participants will be monitored closely throughout the study to assess safety and effectiveness of the treatment in managing weight and associated health conditions.

This trial studies adults aged 50 to under 80 with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis and elevated lipoproteina levels. Researchers are assessing the safety, tolerability, and ability of pelacarsen TQJ230 given once monthly by injection to slow the progression of this heart valve condition. The study compares pelacarsen to a placebo in a randomized, double-blind design. Participants receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo as a subcutaneous injection monthly. They continue treatment and monitoring for up to 36 months to observe changes in heart valve narrowing and calcium buildup. The study also tracks lipoproteina levels and clinical heart-related events during this period. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including imaging to measure aortic valve function and calcium score, blood tests for lipoproteina, and monitoring for safety. The main outcomes analyzed after 36 months include changes in valve jet velocity and calcium score, alongside clinical events. Participants remain under medical care while being observed for any effects of the study drug or placebo.

This observational study follows patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis RMS who are being treated with approved injectable or selected oral disease-modifying therapies DMTs in Germany. The study is non-interventional and open-label, designed to collect real-world data on treatment and disease progression over several years. It aims to understand how patients continue their baseline treatments and how these treatments impact various health and quality of life measures. Participants receive routine medical care with approved injectable or oral DMTs such as ofatumumab, interferon b21, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, or diroximel fumarate. The study includes two cohorts with up to approximately two years of prospective observation each, with an optional extension allowing up to four years total. Treatment decisions and monitoring follow the patients usual care and physicians discretion, including routine visits and telemedicine options. During the study, participants provide medical history, complete questionnaires, and have data collected on disability status, MRI findings, relapses, and laboratory tests. Researchers assess treatment continuation rates, fatigue, anxiety, depression, quality of life, lesion counts, and relapse rates at multiple time points. Safety and treatment interruptions are also documented. Follow-up is flexible and based on standard care procedures, with data collection occurring throughout the observational periods.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of elecoglipron compared with placebo in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus T2DM who are already being treated with insulin and other glucose-lowering medications. This Phase III study focuses on adults with T2DM who have had the condition for at least 90 days and meet certain health criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups elecoglipron at dose level 1, elecoglipron at dose level 2, or placebo. All treatments are taken orally once daily. The study treatment period lasts up to 40 weeks, during which participants continue their background insulin and glucose-lowering medications. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor changes in blood sugar control, including Hemoglobin A1c HbA1c, body weight, blood pressure, and insulin dose. Researchers will also track safety, side effects, and tolerability. The main outcome is the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 40. Overall, participation involves visits for monitoring and evaluations over approximately 40 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia CLL, a type of blood cancer that is aggressive and currently incurable. This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized study aims to compare the effectiveness of a triple drug combination acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax against a double combination obinutuzumab and venetoclax in prolonging progression-free survival PFS for patients with specific high-risk genetic features such as 17p-deletion, TP53 mutation, complex karyotype, or unmutated IGHV gene status. The study addresses a crucial medical need for better treatments in this difficult-to-treat group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives the triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax, while the other group receives obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Obinutuzumab is given as intravenous infusions on specific days across six cycles. Venetoclax is taken orally with a carefully planned dose escalation and maintenance over 12 cycles. Acalabrutinib is administered orally twice daily during cycles 15 to 24. The study explores whether adding acalabrutinib improves outcomes by using these fixed-duration, chemotherapy-free regimens. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor response and safety, including checks for minimal residual disease MRD and overall survival. These evaluations occur up to 50 months after the first patient is enrolled. Researchers will also track progression-free survival, complete and overall response rates, event-free survival, duration of response, and time to next treatment. Safety monitoring and laboratory tests will be performed as part of study visits. The total study participation is expected to last several years to capture long-term outcomes for this high-risk patient population.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new drug combinations, including rilvegostomig with standard platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without ramucirumab, for treating advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. This study is open-label and multicenter, involving participants with confirmed stage IV NSCLC. It includes a sub-study with safety run-in and expansion parts to find the best dose and assess treatment activity. Participants receive treatments infused intravenously, including rilvegostomig, ramucirumab, and chemotherapy drugs like cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel. Non-squamous NSCLC participants are randomly assigned to either rilvegostomig plus chemotherapy with ramucirumab or rilvegostomig plus chemotherapy alone, while squamous NSCLC participants receive rilvegostomig plus chemotherapy and ramucirumab. The study includes initial safety evaluation and dose expansion phases. During the study, participants undergo tumor tissue collection, disease measurements, and regular assessments of side effects, tumor response, and survival. Researchers monitor blood samples for drug levels and antibodies and track progression and overall survival over approximately 46 months. Safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor effects are closely followed throughout the treatment and observation periods.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination of divarasib and pembrolizumab compared with pembrolizumab combined with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin. This study focuses on adults with previously untreated, advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has a KRAS G12C mutation. The goal is to assess these treatments as first-line options in this specific lung cancer population. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will take divarasib orally once daily and receive pembrolizumab through an intravenous infusion every three weeks. The other group will receive pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, and either carboplatin or cisplatin via intravenous infusions every three weeks. Treatment continues with these schedules, following the study protocol for up to approximately five years of follow-up. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their health and response to treatment. These include imaging and clinical evaluations to measure progression-free survival and overall survival for up to five years. Researchers will also track quality of life, symptom changes, treatment side effects, and adverse events using questionnaires and patient-reported outcomes. Safety monitoring and detailed evaluations will help understand the effects of the treatments over the study duration.