Oldenburg Oldb

This research aims to evaluate the effects of litifilimab (BIIB059), a monoclonal antibody, in adults with active subacute or chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants have active skin symptoms of CLE that have not improved with antimalarial therapy or had difficulties continuing that treatment. The study focuses on reducing skin disease activity using several scores including CLA-IGA-R and CLASI, while also assessing safety, immune response, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab or a placebo injection under the skin every four weeks during a 24-week double-blind period where neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. After this, all participants will receive litifilimab injections every four weeks for an additional 28 weeks. Those who complete the treatment may join a long-term extension study or enter a follow-up safety period lasting up to 24 weeks. Total participation may last up to 80 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor skin disease activity using the CLA-IGA-R erythema score and the CLASI-A activity score to see how many participants improve. They will also assess safety, tolerability, immune system effects, and participants' quality of life using questionnaires. These evaluations occur regularly during both treatment periods and follow-up to understand the impact of litifilimab on CLE symptoms and overall health.

Researchers are conducting a phase III randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant cemiplimab immunotherapy in patients with surgically removed stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The study focuses on patients whose tumors express PD-L1 at 1% or higher. The main goal is to measure disease-free survival, tracking the length of time patients remain free from cancer recurrence or death for up to about 59 months. Participants receive cemiplimab intravenously at 350 mg every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by 700 mg every 6 weeks for six cycles, continuing until cancer relapse or unacceptable side effects occur. The treatment is compared to observation without additional adjuvant therapy. The study involves careful dosing schedules and monitoring to assess the impact of cemiplimab as a post-surgical treatment option. During the study, participants undergo brain imaging for staging, tumor PD-L1 testing, and regular pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential. Researchers monitor disease recurrence and adverse effects throughout treatment and follow-up. Patients must meet specific health criteria, including recovery from surgery and adequate organ function, and agree to use contraception during treatment and for four months afterward. The total participation period includes treatment cycles and long-term follow-up to evaluate disease-free survival and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are conducting a phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of orforglipron for treating hypertension in adults who are overweight or have obesity. The study framework supports two independent trials and aims to better understand how orforglipron works in this specific population with high blood pressure and excess weight. Participants receive orforglipron or a placebo orally once daily. The study includes screening and baseline visits to confirm eligibility based on blood pressure and body mass index. Treatment is randomized and double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active medication or placebo during the trial. Throughout the study, researchers monitor blood pressure and other health factors to assess the number of participants assigned to each treatment group. Safety and efficacy are evaluated regularly, with ongoing observation of participants’ response to the medication and any potential side effects.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of orforglipron for treating people who have both hypertension and are either overweight or obese. This study is part of a larger master protocol called GZPL and focuses specifically on these health conditions. The trial is designed as a Phase 3 study to provide important information about this potential treatment. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo, both given orally once daily. The study compares these two groups to understand the impacts of orforglipron on blood pressure and weight-related health issues. The treatment period lasts up to 36 weeks, during which participants are monitored closely. During the study, participants will have their office systolic blood pressure measured to track changes from the start of the trial to week 36. Researchers will also monitor safety and other health measures throughout the trial. The study involves regular visits and assessments to ensure participant well-being and to gather thorough data on the treatment's effects.

This research aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of orforglipron for treating hypertension in adults with obesity or overweight. It is conducted as part of the GZPL master protocol and focuses on participants who have both high blood pressure and elevated body weight. The study is designed as a Phase 3 clinical trial to provide detailed evaluation of this new treatment approach. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo, both given orally once daily. The study compares these two groups to understand the benefits and any side effects of orforglipron when used for managing hypertension in this specific population. The treatment period and detailed dosing schedule are based on the master protocol, which guides participant management and study procedures. During the study, participants will have their systolic blood pressure measured regularly to track changes from the start through week 36. Researchers will monitor safety and treatment effects closely, following all procedures outlined in the master protocol. The overall duration of participant involvement and additional assessments are determined by the master protocol guidelines for this comprehensive evaluation.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of pelacarsen (TQJ230), given as a monthly injection under the skin, in people with mild to moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. This study aims to see if pelacarsen can safely slow the progression of this heart valve condition compared to a placebo. The trial is a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at multiple centers. Participants will receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo once a month. Before starting the treatment, they must have elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and be optimally treated for existing cardiovascular risk factors. The study focuses on those aged 50 to under 80 years with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. During the 36 months of participation, researchers will monitor changes in peak aortic jet velocity and aortic valve calcium score to assess disease progression. Safety, tolerability, and the impact of the treatment will be evaluated. Participants will undergo regular assessments, including laboratory tests and clinical evaluations, to track heart valve condition and overall health throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a common and aggressive form of leukemia. This phase 3, open-label, randomized study aims to compare a triple combination therapy of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (GAVe) against a double combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) to see which better prolongs progression-free survival (PFS). High risk CLL patients are identified by specific genetic risk factors such as 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype, or unmutated IGHV gene status, which indicate a poorer prognosis and less response to chemotherapy. Participants receive fixed-duration treatments. The triple combination group receives obinutuzumab via intravenous infusion during cycles 1 through 6, venetoclax orally with a gradual dose ramp-up from cycle 1 to 12, and acalabrutinib orally twice daily during cycles 15 to 24. The comparison group receives obinutuzumab and venetoclax on the same schedules but without acalabrutinib. The study investigates how adding the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib to the existing combination may improve outcomes by targeting different pathways and reducing early disease progression. During the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival over 50 months after the first patient is included. Researchers assess clinical status, laboratory tests, and genetic markers to evaluate response and safety. The study also tracks liver and kidney function, infection status, and adverse events to ensure treatment tolerability. The total duration includes initial treatment cycles and extended follow-up to measure the long-term effectiveness of these therapies in high risk CLL patients.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of various new drug combinations, including novel agents combined with standard treatments, for people with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This open-label, multicenter trial focuses on sub-study 2, which examines rilvegostomig combined with standard platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without ramucirumab, in participants with advanced NSCLC. The study aims to identify optimal doses and expand cohorts to better understand treatment safety and tumor response. The trial involves two parts: Part A includes safety run-in groups to test different dose levels of rilvegostomig and establish the recommended Phase 2 dose if not already known. Part B expands to larger groups to assess treatment effects. Rilvegostomig and other study drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, and ramucirumab are given by intravenous infusion according to the study protocol. Sub-study 1 was canceled and will not take place. Participants will undergo assessments including tumor tissue sampling, disease measurement scans, and laboratory tests to monitor organ function and treatment effects. Researchers will track adverse events, serious adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, and tumor responses over approximately 46 months. Safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity are key outcomes, with follow-up to ensure participant well-being and gather comprehensive data on these novel treatment combinations.