Nashik

Researchers are studying the effects of AP-Brain collagen peptide on attention, focus, stress, and memory in adults aged 35 to 70 who are stressed but otherwise healthy. The study aims to find out how different doses of AP-Brain affect brain function and to identify any side effects. The trial is a randomized, open-label, parallel design sponsored by Rousselot BVBA. Participants will take either a low dose one 1g tablet or a higher dose three 1g tablets of bovine-based AP-Brain collagen peptide once daily for 56 days. The study includes two groups receiving these different doses to compare their effects on cognitive abilities and stress levels. During the study, participants will visit the study center regularly for checkups. They will complete tests that measure attention, focus, and memory and answer surveys about stress. Blood samples will be collected, vital signs checked, and brain responses monitored to understand the impact of AP-Brain. The main outcome focuses on changes in attention and focus after 56 days of treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma LA-HNSCC who have not progressed after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy cCRT. This phase III, randomized, open-label global study aims to assess whether volrustomig can improve outcomes in this patient population. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups those who receive volrustomig as sequential therapy, and those who undergo observation without additional treatment. The study compares these two approaches following prior curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The trial includes long-term follow-up to monitor patient outcomes. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for progression-free survival, overall survival, physical functioning, and quality of life. Researchers will also monitor for the presence of anti-drug antibodies and adverse events related to volrustomig. Follow-up evaluations may continue for up to approximately eight years to fully understand the treatment impact and safety profile.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and how the body processes and responds to osivelotor in people with sickle cell disease SCD. This multicenter, Phase 23 study focuses on both adults and adolescents with SCD, aiming to determine the best dose and assess the drugs effects over time. The study has three parts. Part A tests safety, tolerability, and dose-finding in adults with SCD, starting with randomization to different daily doses of osivelotor, ranging from 100 mg to potentially 200 mg, over 12 weeks. Part B compares osivelotor to placebo in adults and adolescents over 48 weeks, with adults receiving an initial 300 mg daily dose for 7 days followed by 150 mg daily, while adolescent dosing will be defined later. The Open Label Extension OLE offers long-term open-label osivelotor treatment for up to two years after Part B. Participants will be monitored throughout the study with regular visits to assess safety, blood responses, and how well they tolerate the medication. The main results will be reviewed through 12 weeks in Part A, 48 weeks in Part B, and approximately 24 months in the OLE. The study includes blood tests, monitoring of vaso-occlusive crises, and other health evaluations to understand osivelotors effects and safety over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and immune response of the RSVpreF vaccine in adults living in India. This phase 3, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study aims to learn how the vaccine affects adults, including those with certain stable chronic medical conditions that may increase their risk of respiratory syncytial virus RSV disease. The study is sponsored by Pfizer and focuses on prevention of RSV infection. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the RSVpreF vaccine or a placebo. The vaccine is given as an injection, and the study will monitor participants for local and systemic reactions within 7 days after vaccination, as well as adverse events through 1 month and serious adverse events for 3 months post-vaccination. The immune response will be measured by neutralizing antibody levels against RSV A and RSV B before vaccination and 1 month afterward. During the study, participants will be observed for safety and immune response through scheduled visits. Researchers will collect data on side effects, serious health events, and antibody levels. The study includes adults aged 18 and older who live independently and are ambulatory. Participation involves medical history review and physical exams as needed. The trial will continue until January 25, 2027, with assessments focused on vaccine safety and immune response over several months.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of GIA632 in adults aged 18 to 99 years with non-segmental vitiligo NSV. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study aims to understand the dose-response relationship of GIA632 and determine the best dose to advance to a Phase 3 study. Participants have NSV affecting specific body surface areas confirmed by physical examination. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of four different doses of GIA632 or a placebo. The assigned treatment is administered over a 48-week core period. After this period, an extension phase assesses longer-term safety and efficacy of the study drug. The study compares changes in facial and total body vitiligo scores at various time points up to 48 weeks. Throughout the study, participants undergo assessments including Vitiligo Area Scoring Index VASI measurements on the face and body, and the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale VNS. These assessments occur at baseline and multiple follow-up visits up to week 48. Researchers monitor participants for treatment effects and safety during the entire study duration, which runs until 2030, ensuring detailed evaluation of GIA632 over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Datopotamab Deruxtecan Dato-DXd with or without Durvalumab compared to investigators choice chemotherapy combined with Pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer TNBC. This Phase III, randomized, open-label, international study aims to determine if Dato-DXd with Durvalumab can improve progression-free survival and overall survival while assessing quality of life impacts in this patient population. Participants are assigned to one of three groups Dato-DXd with Durvalumab, investigators choice chemotherapy paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin combined with Pembrolizumab, or Dato-DXd alone. All study drugs are given by intravenous infusion. The study includes stratification by geographic region, disease-free interval, and prior PD-1PD-L1 treatment. Treatment continues with monitoring up to about 33 months for progression-free survival and safety, with some outcomes followed up to 64 months. Throughout the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging to measure tumor response using RECIST criteria, laboratory tests, and questionnaires to evaluate symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor time to disease progression, overall survival, response duration, and safety outcomes. Follow-up includes evaluation of subsequent therapies and pharmacokinetics. The total participation duration can be up to several years to capture long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are conducting a Phase I open-label study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and optimal biological dose of AUR107 in adults with relapsed advanced malignancies. The study focuses on patients with selected advanced solid tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, urothelial cancer, kidney cancer, colon cancer, and esophageal cancer, who have no curative or life-prolonging treatment options left. This first-in-human trial aims to find the best dose of AUR107 using a traditional dose-escalation design. Participants will receive oral AUR107 once daily at escalating doses ranging from 5 mg to 200 mg. The trial follows a 33 dose escalation design to evaluate safety and determine the optimal biological dose based on safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics data. The study is multicenter and includes dose expansion following dose escalation. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-related adverse events over 28-day cycles. Researchers will measure pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the curve, mean residence time, and elimination half-life at various time points under fasting and fed conditions. Safety assessments and clinical evaluations will be conducted throughout the study, which is expected to continue until June 2027.