Nashik

Researchers are evaluating the effects of Native CT-II4 (undenatured type II collagen) on knee joint health in adults aged 40 to 65 years with knee osteoarthritis (OA). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compares Native CT-II4 to glucosamine HCL plus chondroitin sulfate and a placebo to assess improvements over 90 days. Knee OA is a common, painful joint condition that limits movement and quality of life, especially in older adults, and current treatments may have side effects. This study aims to find better options for managing knee OA symptoms and function. Participants are assigned to one of three groups: one receives Native CT-II4 at 40 mg daily in divided doses, another receives glucosamine HCL plus chondroitin sulfate (2700 mg daily), and the third group receives a placebo made of microcrystalline cellulose. Each participant takes three capsules after breakfast and three after dinner for 90 days. The study plans to enroll about 114 participants, aiming for 90 to complete the trial, with knee OA grades II or III. The interventions are given orally, and the study compares the effects of these supplements on joint health. During the study, participants undergo assessments at days 0, 7, 30, 60, and 90, including evaluation of knee pain and function using the modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (mWOMAC). Researchers monitor changes in symptoms, joint health, and quality of life. Participants are also required to avoid certain foods and medications that could affect collagen levels or knee pain relief during the study. Safety and adherence are tracked throughout the 90-day period to evaluate the supplements' impact on knee osteoarthritis.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

The trial investigates the safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and how the body processes and responds to osivelotor in people with sickle cell disease (SCD). This Phase 2/3, multicenter study involves adults and adolescents with SCD, aiming to find the best dose and compare osivelotor to a placebo. The study also includes a long-term extension to assess ongoing safety and blood-related effects. Osivelotor is given orally as tablets. The study has three parts: Part A focuses on determining a safe and effective dose in adults; Part B compares osivelotor to placebo in adults and adolescents over 48 weeks; and the Open Label Extension (OLE) offers continued treatment to those who completed Part B to monitor long-term safety and responses. Participants will be monitored throughout the study periods with assessments of safety, tolerability, and treatment effects. These include evaluations at 12 weeks (Part A), 48 weeks (Part B), and approximately 24 months after the last participant joins (OLE). Researchers will track blood values, side effects, and disease-related events to understand how the drug works and its impact on SCD over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) with or without durvalumab compared to the investigator's choice chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab in patients who have PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This Phase III, randomized, open-label, international study aims to see if adding durvalumab to Dato-DXd can help patients live longer without their cancer worsening or simply live longer compared to standard chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. The study also examines how the treatments and cancer impact patients' quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Dato-DXd plus durvalumab, Dato-DXd alone, or investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) combined with pembrolizumab. All treatments are given by intravenous infusion. The study design includes stratification based on geographic location, disease-free interval history, and prior PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for early-stage TNBC. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their disease status using RECIST 1.1 criteria and undergo imaging reviewed by blinded independent central review. Researchers will track progression-free survival, quality of life, safety, and other health measures over an anticipated period of up to 33 months. Participants must provide tumor samples for PD-L1 testing, and safety monitoring will continue throughout the study.

Researchers are investigating whether ziltivekimab can treat people living with heart failure and inflammation. The study compares ziltivekimab, a new medicine not yet approved anywhere, to a placebo, an inactive substance that looks like the medicine but contains no active drug. Participants have an equal chance of receiving either treatment. The study is expected to last up to one year and four months and focuses on people with heart failure who also have systemic inflammation. Participants will receive either ziltivekimab or placebo by monthly injections under the skin. The doses are given once a month throughout the study period. The study lasts for 12 months of treatment following randomization, during which the effects of the medicine compared to placebo will be closely monitored. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including a heart failure questionnaire called the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) to measure symptoms and physical function over the 12 months. Other evaluations may include walking tests and heart function tests. Safety and health will be monitored regularly to understand how participants respond to the treatments and to track any side effects or changes in heart failure symptoms.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 1, open-label study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and optimal biological dose of AUR107 in adult patients with relapsed advanced solid tumors. These tumors include non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, urothelial cancer, kidney cancer, colon cancer, and esophageal cancer. Participants must have no available curative or life-prolonging treatments and have exhausted all effective local therapies. Participants will receive oral AUR107 once daily. The study uses a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design to assess safety and determine the optimal biological dose based on safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics data. The treatment period focuses on finding the best dose and assessing how the drug behaves in the body. During the study, participants will be monitored for dose limiting toxicities and treatment-related adverse events over 28 days. Researchers will evaluate pharmacokinetics parameters such as maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the curve, mean residence time, and half-life at specified days. Safety assessments, disease measurements, and tolerability will be closely followed to understand the effects of AUR107.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 1, open-label study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and optimal biological dose of AUR108 in adult patients with relapsed advanced lymphomas. This study focuses on patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma who have exhausted effective local treatments and have no curative or life-prolonging options available. The trial uses a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design to evaluate AUR108 as a single oral agent. Participants will receive oral AUR108 with a schedule of dosing for 3 days followed by 4 days without dosing each week. The study includes dose escalation to determine the optimal biological dose based on safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics data. The research will monitor treatment-related adverse events and measure drug levels and effects over time. During the study, participants will undergo safety assessments including monitoring for dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-related adverse events, pharmacokinetic evaluations at specified time points, and clinical evaluations for disease response. The study duration averages about one year with ongoing safety follow-up. Researchers will collect data on adverse events, drug concentration, and patient health to evaluate the treatment's safety and dosing parameters.

Researchers are evaluating the anti-tumor activity of amivantamab combined with pembrolizumab and carboplatin compared to pembrolizumab, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and platinum therapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) in participants with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This trial focuses on participants who have not received prior systemic treatment in the recurrent/metastatic setting. HNSCC is a type of cancer affecting the outer tissue layer of the mouth and throat and other head and neck regions. Participants will receive either amivantamab added to pembrolizumab and carboplatin or the standard care regimen of pembrolizumab, 5-FU, and a platinum agent (carboplatin or cisplatin). 5-FU will be given as an infusion over a 4-day period. The study is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing these treatment combinations. During the study, researchers will monitor overall survival and the objective response rate using standard tumor evaluation criteria for up to about 3 years and 7 months. Participants will undergo assessments to measure disease response, including imaging and other evaluations, to track how well the treatments work. Safety and side effects will also be monitored throughout the trial period.