Prato

Researchers are conducting a phase III randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant cemiplimab immunotherapy in patients with surgically removed stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The study focuses on patients whose tumors express PD-L1 at 1% or higher. The main goal is to measure disease-free survival, tracking the length of time patients remain free from cancer recurrence or death for up to about 59 months. Participants receive cemiplimab intravenously at 350 mg every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by 700 mg every 6 weeks for six cycles, continuing until cancer relapse or unacceptable side effects occur. The treatment is compared to observation without additional adjuvant therapy. The study involves careful dosing schedules and monitoring to assess the impact of cemiplimab as a post-surgical treatment option. During the study, participants undergo brain imaging for staging, tumor PD-L1 testing, and regular pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential. Researchers monitor disease recurrence and adverse effects throughout treatment and follow-up. Patients must meet specific health criteria, including recovery from surgery and adequate organ function, and agree to use contraception during treatment and for four months afterward. The total participation period includes treatment cycles and long-term follow-up to evaluate disease-free survival and safety.

Researchers are conducting a large prospective, observational cohort study to assess the clinical impact of new monoclonal antibodies (MAB) in treating B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) within Italian clinical practice. The study focuses on patients needing treatment for B-cell NHL, including those receiving first-line or relapsed/refractory therapy. The novel MAB being studied have received approval from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) since 2020 and are prescribed according to authorized marketing indications in Italy. Participants will receive novel MAB treatments either alone or in combination, prescribed based on EMA-approved indications since 2020. Patients will be grouped into cohorts according to the treatment indication, antibody type, and lymphoma subtype, with additional sub-cohorts created if necessary. This design allows analysis by indication, antibody type, subtype, and overall evaluation of the entire patient cohort. Throughout the study, researchers will collect clinical information to evaluate the use, feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of these novel antibodies. Key outcomes measured over at least five years include overall response rate, complete response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival, time to next treatment, non-relapse mortality, duration of response, and incidence of early and late adverse events. Participants will be closely monitored for both short- and long-term effects of the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Dostarlimab compared to a placebo in adults with locally advanced unresected Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on patients who have completed chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin and radiation and have no distant metastatic disease. The study requires confirmation of PD-L1 positive tumor status and specific testing for oropharyngeal carcinoma cases. Participants will receive either Dostarlimab or a placebo as an intravenous infusion following their chemoradiation treatment. The study monitors these treatments as sequential therapy to assess their impact on disease progression. Treatments are administered in a controlled, blinded manner to compare outcomes between the two groups effectively. During the study, participants will be followed for up to approximately five years to measure event-free survival, with evaluations conducted by blinded independent central review. Assessments will include monitoring for safety, disease status, and any adverse events throughout the study period. This long-term follow-up aims to provide comprehensive data on the effectiveness and safety of Dostarlimab as post-chemoradiation therapy in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating how well elacestrant works compared to standard endocrine therapy in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who are at high risk of the cancer returning. This is a Phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focusing on participants who have had early invasive breast cancer removed and meet specific receptor and risk criteria. The study aims to understand which treatment better prevents invasive breast cancer over up to five years. Participants will receive either elacestrant or one of several standard endocrine therapies, including anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen, all given as oral tablets. Treatments will be administered according to the study plan, with careful monitoring throughout the trial. The study includes adults who have already received between 24 and 60 months of prior endocrine therapy, with or without certain inhibitors, and who have completed or stopped these treatments as required. During the study, participants will be monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform regular assessments to track treatment effects, side effects, and cancer recurrence. The study also includes safety monitoring and may involve additional tests or evaluations as needed to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of iza-bren, a bi-specific antibody-drug conjugate targeting EGFR and HER3 with a topoisomerase inhibitor, compared to the treatment of physician's choice (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine). The study focuses on patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, recurrent inoperable, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or estrogen receptor (ER)-low, HER2-negative breast cancer who are not eligible for anti-PD(L)1 or endocrine therapies. The trial is conducted in two phases, phase 2 and phase 3, to thoroughly assess these treatments.

Researchers are evaluating a new medicine called Sofetabart Mipitecan (LY4170156) in adults with certain types of ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancers. This phase 3 study has two parts: Part A focuses on participants whose cancer no longer responds to platinum-based chemotherapy, while Part B includes those whose cancer still responds to platinum-based treatments. The study aims to compare Sofetabart Mipitecan against current standard treatments and to better understand its safety. Participants receive treatments administered through intravenous (IV) infusions. In Part A, Sofetabart Mipitecan is compared with various chemotherapy drugs or mirvetuximab soravtansine. In Part B, Sofetabart Mipitecan combined with bevacizumab is compared with platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Each participant's time in the study depends on how they respond to the treatment. During the study, researchers monitor participants for progression-free survival, measuring the time from randomization until cancer progression or death, for up to 70 months. Participants undergo assessments including scans to track tumor changes and evaluations of safety and side effects. The study collects tumor tissue samples and monitors participants' health status regularly to understand treatment effects and safety over time.

Researchers are conducting a prospective national study in Italy to better understand Epithelioid Sarcoma (ES), a rare type of cancer. The study aims to describe the population affected by ES, explore the natural progression of the disease, and address key questions about its management. It also focuses on comparing the two main variants of ES, classical-type and proximal-type, to improve knowledge of the disease and tailor treatments accordingly. Participants in this observational study will receive treatment for Epithelioid Sarcoma following established disease guidelines. The study does not specify particular experimental treatments but observes the types of treatment patients receive from diagnosis onward. This approach allows researchers to gather real-world data on how ES is managed and treated over time. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor the type of treatment given to patients with ES from the time of diagnosis until death from any cause, for up to 60 months. Patient compliance with treatment and follow-up is important for participation. The study collects information to enhance understanding of disease outcomes and differences between ES variants, aiming to provide insights that may improve patient care in the future.

This research investigates the effectiveness and safety of combining capivasertib with CDK4/6 inhibitors and fulvestrant in adults with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer that is locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic. It includes a Phase Ib dose-finding portion to establish safe dosages for the triple combination, followed by a Phase III study comparing this combination to CDK4/6 inhibitors plus fulvestrant alone. The study focuses on patients who have not received prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease and aims to assess added benefit in a high-risk population. During Phase Ib, participants receive capivasertib orally twice daily for 4 days followed by 3 days off each week, combined with fulvestrant injections and one of the CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) at varying doses to find the recommended dose for Phase III. In Phase III, participants are randomized to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor at the established dose or fulvestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor alone, with dosing schedules maintained over 28-day cycles. Participants undergo regular monitoring including scans for tumor assessment, blood tests, and safety evaluations over extended periods—up to 47 months for progression-free survival assessment. Researchers track adverse events, serious side effects, and treatment tolerability throughout. Mandatory tumor and blood samples are collected for biomarker analysis. The study evaluates key outcomes such as dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related adverse events, and progression-free survival, supporting long-term safety and effectiveness evaluation.

Researchers are evaluating TORL-1-23 in a Phase 2 study for women with advanced platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, including primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancers expressing Claudin 6. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of TORL-1-23 given as a single treatment in those whose disease has progressed despite prior platinum-based therapies. Eligible participants must have confirmed high-grade ovarian or related cancers and tumors positive for CLDN6 expression. The treatment involves intravenous infusions of TORL-1-23 at doses of 2.4 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg, or 3.4 mg/kg on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle. Additionally, participants receive a 6.0 mg subcutaneous injection of Pegfilgrastim on Day 4 of each cycle to support white blood cell counts. Treatment continues until disease progression or other criteria are met, and the study's total duration is about 40 months. Participants will be closely monitored from the first dose through the study duration with assessments at predefined intervals to measure disease response and safety. Evaluations include imaging scans to measure tumor size, laboratory tests for organ function, heart monitoring with ECG, and regular clinical exams. Researchers will track the therapy's effects on tumor progression and side effects to understand the overall benefit and safety of TORL-1-23 in this patient group.

Researchers are conducting a two-part, phase 2b/3 study to evaluate CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in adults with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis who have systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes. The study aims to determine the best dose of CSL300 and assess its effects on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in this population. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial targets patients with elevated inflammation markers and significant health risks due to their conditions. In the first part (phase 2b), the study focuses on finding the appropriate dose of CSL300 compared to placebo. CSL300 is given through intravenous (IV) administration. The second part (phase 3) evaluates the impact of CSL300 on cardiovascular events such as heart attack or cardiovascular death over approximately 5 years, continuing to compare CSL300 to placebo for safety and efficacy. The placebo matches CSL300's excipient content but lacks the active drug. Participants will undergo baseline and regular assessments for inflammation markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) up to 12 weeks in phase 2b, and long-term monitoring for cardiovascular outcomes in phase 3. The study involves ongoing safety evaluations and efficacy measurements during the entire follow-up period. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand how CSL300 affects inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with ESKD on dialysis.