Guadalajara

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition in older adults. It often coexists with quadriceps muscle weakness, sarcopenia, and frailty, all of which contribute to pain, functional decline, and loss of independence. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative for pain relief in OA, with growing interest in its application at both articular and muscular levels. High-intensity pulsed electromagnetic field (HI-PEMF) therapy-also known as the super inductive system-generates magnetic fields up to 2.5 Tesla, capable of stimulating both joint structures and skeletal muscle via deep tissue electric induction. HI-PEMF has shown promising results for pain reduction, anti-inflammatory modulation, and muscle bioactivation, particularly when applied over the quadriceps. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-assignment clinical trial aims to compare the effects of two HI-PEMF treatment modalities in older adults with moderate to severe knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-IV): * Group A: HI-PEMF applied exclusively over the symptomatic knee. * Group 2: HI-PEMF applied both over the knee and the quadriceps (bimodal). Both groups will also perform a standardized home-based strengthening and mobility exercise program. A total of 64 participants (32 per group) will receive 9 sessions of HI-PEMF (2 per week for 5 weeks), using the BTL-6000 Super Inductive System. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. The primary outcome is change in pain intensity using the Numeric Analog Scale (NAS). Secondary outcomes include functional tests (Timed Up and Go and 5-times Sit-to-Stand), and paracetamol use. Exploratory subgroup analyses will assess associations with frailty status (FRAIL), probable sarcopenia (SARC-F), and radiological OA grade. This study seeks to generate evidence on the potential synergistic benefits of combining articular and muscular HI-PEMF therapy in geriatric rehabilitation. It is designed for implementation in a public hospital setting in Mexico, with minimal risk and high feasibility. All procedures follow ethical guidelines and have received institutional review board approval.

Researchers are evaluating whether supplementation with alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) for one month can reduce inflammation and clinical activity in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Rheumatoid arthritis is a common autoimmune disease causing chronic inflammation in small joints, leading to pain, stiffness, and potential joint damage. This clinical, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial aims to compare vitamin E supplementation with a placebo in patients with early RA who have deficient vitamin E intake and are receiving standard treatments. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups: one receiving vitamin E 800 mg per day alongside their conventional synthetic FARMEs treatments, and the other receiving a placebo of 200 mg/day magnesium oxide with their FARMEs. The intervention lasts for one month, during which participants take two capsules daily—one in the morning and one in the afternoon. The study includes baseline and one-month follow-up visits for clinical evaluation and sample collection. During the study, participants will keep a diary to track symptoms and supplement intake. Researchers will assess vitamin E levels, inflammation markers including pro-inflammatory cytokines, clinical activity scores, and antioxidant capacity before and after supplementation. Safety and adherence will be monitored throughout, with final check-ups and laboratory tests conducted at the end of the month. Total participation duration is approximately one month.

This research aims to evaluate the effects of litifilimab (BIIB059), a monoclonal antibody, in adults with active subacute or chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants have active skin symptoms of CLE that have not improved with antimalarial therapy or had difficulties continuing that treatment. The study focuses on reducing skin disease activity using several scores including CLA-IGA-R and CLASI, while also assessing safety, immune response, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab or a placebo injection under the skin every four weeks during a 24-week double-blind period where neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. After this, all participants will receive litifilimab injections every four weeks for an additional 28 weeks. Those who complete the treatment may join a long-term extension study or enter a follow-up safety period lasting up to 24 weeks. Total participation may last up to 80 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor skin disease activity using the CLA-IGA-R erythema score and the CLASI-A activity score to see how many participants improve. They will also assess safety, tolerability, immune system effects, and participants' quality of life using questionnaires. These evaluations occur regularly during both treatment periods and follow-up to understand the impact of litifilimab on CLE symptoms and overall health.

Researchers are studying advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that has returned after prior adjuvant therapy. The trial aims to find out if treatment with belzutifan and zanzalintinib helps patients live longer and delays disease progression compared to treatment with cabozantinib. This is a Phase 3 randomized study focusing on participants with recurrent advanced RCC who have previously received anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of two oral drug regimens: either belzutifan combined with zanzalintinib, both taken once daily, or cabozantinib alone, also taken once daily. The study compares these treatments to assess their effects on disease control and overall survival. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival for up to approximately 73 months. Researchers will evaluate how well the cancer responds to treatment and track any changes in health status over time. Safety and effectiveness of the treatments will be closely followed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for breast cancer that is hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), specifically in cases where the cancer is either locally advanced and cannot be removed by surgery or has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). The study aims to determine if patritumab deruxtecan (also called HER3-DXd or MK-1022) helps patients live longer overall or without the cancer growing compared to chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial focusing on this particular type of breast cancer. Participants receive one of several treatments: patritumab deruxtecan through intravenous infusion, chemotherapy options like paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel via IV, oral capecitabine tablets, liposomal doxorubicin via IV, or trastuzumab deruxtecan via IV infusion. The study compares the effects of patritumab deruxtecan alone to the treatment chosen by the physician. Treatments are administered according to standard dosing schedules during the trial. During the study, participants are monitored for how long they live without the cancer progressing (up to about 45 months) and overall survival (up to about 85 months). Researchers assess disease status through imaging and other evaluations. Participants have regular check-ups to monitor health, treatment effects, and any side effects. The study tracks treatment response and safety over the extended follow-up period to understand the benefits and risks of the therapies.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous ianalumab in adults with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. This Phase 2 study compares ianalumab with a placebo in participants diagnosed according to established classification criteria, focusing on those with active disease and specific autoantibodies. The goal is to better understand ianalumab's impact on this condition over a long treatment period. The study includes several phases: up to 6 weeks for screening, followed by a 52-week initial treatment period where participants receive either ianalumab or placebo by subcutaneous injection. After this, there is a second 52-week open-label treatment period where all participants receive ianalumab. Finally, a post-treatment follow-up period lasts at least 20 weeks and can extend up to 2 years after the last dose. Participants will undergo various assessments throughout the study, including evaluations of their skin condition using the rCRISS25 response at week 52. Safety and tolerability will also be closely monitored. The study involves regular visits for clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, and monitoring of disease activity and antibody status, with the total participation potentially lasting over two years including follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effects of a combination treatment using BNT113 and pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab alone for patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) that is positive for human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16+) and expresses the PD-L1 protein with a combined positive score of 1 or higher. This Phase II/III trial includes patients whose cancer cannot be treated with local therapies and who have not received prior systemic anticancer therapy for their current disease condition. The trial consists of two parts. Part A is a non-randomized Safety Run-In Phase to confirm the safety and tolerability of BNT113 combined with pembrolizumab at the selected dose. Part B is a randomized phase that compares BNT113 plus pembrolizumab against pembrolizumab alone as first-line treatment. Patients in Part A continue their treatment without randomization. Treatments are given by intravenous injection or infusion, and patients may receive either combination therapy or monotherapy for up to 24 months. There is also an optional pre-screening phase to test tumor samples for HPV16 DNA and PD-L1 expression before entering the main trial. Participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements based on RECIST 1.1 criteria confirmed by independent review. Researchers monitor treatment-emergent adverse events for up to 27 months in Part A and evaluate overall survival and progression-free survival for up to 48 months in Part B. Tumor tissue samples are collected before treatment to confirm eligibility. The study involves ongoing safety monitoring and efficacy evaluations throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of RO7507062 in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This is a Phase 1, first-in-human study with two parts: Part 1 involves single ascending doses to find the appropriate dose, and Part 2 involves dose escalation using fractionated dosing. Tocilizumab may also be used by investigators if needed to manage cytokine release syndrome during the study. Participants will receive RO7507062 as a subcutaneous injection according to their assigned treatment arm. Tocilizumab solution for infusion may be given intravenously at 8 mg/kg for participants weighing 30 kg or more, or at 12 mg/kg for those under 30 kg if clinically required. The study consists of a dose-finding period followed by a dose escalation period with fractionated doses, with safety evaluations extending through these phases. During the study, participants will be monitored for dose-limiting adverse events from day 1 through day 29 in Part 1 and through the 28-day safety evaluation in Part 2. Adverse events will be tracked for up to approximately 12 months. The study includes assessments of safety, drug levels, and effects on disease activity. Participants will undergo clinical evaluations and laboratory tests throughout their involvement, which includes the treatment and follow-up periods.