Amersfoort

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Attachment Based Family Therapy (ABFT) compared to Treatment As Usual (TAU) for young adults aged 18 to 25 who experience frequent suicidal thoughts. This mental health issue is a serious concern worldwide, especially in Belgium and the Netherlands, where suicide is a leading cause of death among young adults. Current treatments have limited success, and this study aims to see if ABFT, which focuses on improving family relationships, can better reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors and support young adults and their families. The study is a randomized controlled trial involving 138 participants from multiple sites including hospitals, mental health centers, and private practices in Belgium and the Netherlands. Participants are assigned to either ABFT plus TAU or TAU alone. ABFT is a manualized therapy that strengthens parent-child attachment to create a secure support base, delivered in weekly sessions over about 16 weeks. TAU consists of existing standard treatments such as antidepressants, cognitive behavioral therapy, or dialectical behavior therapy, with limited family therapy. Parents or caregivers may be involved in both treatments. Participants will be assessed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up to measure changes in suicidality using questionnaires and therapist reports. Researchers will also evaluate cost-effectiveness, family functioning, depressive symptoms, and treatment adherence. The study aims to improve clinical guidelines and policymaking to enhance care for suicidal young adults and their families over a one-year period.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating how well two new study drugs, CagriSema and cagrilintide, help children and adolescents with excess body weight lose weight. This trial includes participants aged 8 to less than 18 years who have overweight or obesity. The study is designed in two parts: a main study and an extension study. The main study compares CagriSema, cagrilintide, semaglutide (an already approved drug), and placebo, with treatments assigned randomly. Participants receiving semaglutide will not continue to the extension study. The total time in the main study is about 1 year and 6 months, while those in the extension study may participate for up to about 4 years and 10 months. Participants in the main study will receive one of the four treatments by subcutaneous injection. In the extension study, participants will receive either CagriSema or cagrilintide. The study drugs are monitored closely for safety, and participants may experience side effects. The study compares these new treatments to a placebo and an existing approved drug to better understand their effects on weight management in young people. During the study, researchers will measure changes in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to week 68 as the primary outcome. Participants will undergo various assessments including laboratory tests and physical evaluations. The study tracks adherence to treatment and monitors safety throughout the study period. This comprehensive approach aims to provide detailed information about the efficacy and safety of these medications for managing weight in children and adolescents.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 study to compare two front-line treatments for adults with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is stage IV or advanced stage IIIB/C. The study focuses on patients whose tumors have a KRAS p.G12C mutation and are negative for PD-L1 expression. The main goal is to evaluate how each treatment affects progression-free survival and overall survival over about 2.5 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sotorasib combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy or pembrolizumab combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy. Sotorasib is given orally, while pembrolizumab is given intravenously. Both groups will receive the combination therapies as their initial treatment for advanced NSCLC. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess treatment effects and safety. Researchers will track how long patients live without the cancer worsening and overall survival over approximately 2.5 years. The study includes evaluations to determine eligibility and ongoing assessments to monitor health and treatment response throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of divarasib combined with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin. The study focuses on adults with advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific KRAS G12C mutation. This is a Phase III trial aiming to improve first-line treatment options for these patients. Participants will receive one of two treatment combinations. One group will take divarasib orally once daily along with pembrolizumab given through an intravenous infusion every three weeks. The other group will receive pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin, all administered by intravenous infusion every three weeks. Treatment schedules and dosages are carefully monitored during the study. Throughout the study, participants will be regularly assessed for progression-free survival and overall survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately five years. Researchers will perform various evaluations including tumor measurements and safety monitoring. This long-term observation helps to understand the treatments' effects and safety over time, supporting informed decisions for future lung cancer therapies.

Researchers are comparing how long participants with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer remain disease-free and their overall survival time when treated with two different regimens. This phase 3 study focuses on patients who have previously received chemotherapy. The study aims to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival in participants receiving amivantamab plus FOLFIRI versus cetuximab or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. The study involves two treatment groups: one receiving amivantamab combined with chemotherapy drugs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and the other receiving either cetuximab or bevacizumab with the same chemotherapy regimen. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these treatment arms. The treatments will be administered according to protocol to assess their effects on the cancer. Participants will be monitored for up to 2 years and 1 month to measure progression-free survival through blinded independent central review and followed for overall survival for up to 4 years and 4 months. The study includes assessments of tumor response, safety, and other clinical evaluations. Tissue samples and detailed clinical data will also be collected. This comprehensive monitoring will help determine the comparative effectiveness of the treatment options over time.

This trial is focused on adults with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type unresectable or metastatic left-sided colorectal cancer. It compares the length of time participants remain free from disease progression when treated with amivantamab combined with chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI) versus cetuximab combined with the same chemotherapy regimens. The study is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate progression-free survival over a period of up to 4 years and 2 months. Participants receive either amivantamab with chemotherapy drugs including 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan hydrochloride, or cetuximab with the same chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI). Treatments are administered as first-line therapy for their colorectal cancer. The trial assesses how these treatments affect disease progression and survival. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly through assessments and evaluations to measure progression-free survival. Researchers will gather data via blinded independent central review to ensure unbiased assessment of disease status. Participants are followed up for safety and treatment efficacy over the study duration, which may last over four years.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of the drug orforglipron compared with a placebo on cardiovascular outcomes in adults who have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to investigate major adverse cardiovascular events over a long period. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo orally. The study is event-driven and will continue until the occurrence of major cardiovascular events or up to about 5 years. The treatments are administered without revealing to participants which group they are in to ensure unbiased results. During the study, participants will be monitored for the time to the first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event. Researchers will collect data from baseline through the end of the study, which lasts approximately 5 years. Regular assessments will help evaluate the safety and effects of the treatments on cardiovascular health in this population.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding intismeran autogene to pembrolizumab after surgery can help people with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain cancer-free longer compared to pembrolizumab with a placebo. This study focuses on patients with NSCLC whose tumors did not completely respond to treatment before surgery and aims to prevent the cancer from returning. It is a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study involving participants with resectable Stage II to IIIB (N2) NSCLC. Participants receive treatments including pembrolizumab given as an intravenous infusion and either intismeran autogene or placebo administered as an intramuscular injection. Before surgery, patients have received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, but only those who did not achieve a complete pathological response are eligible. The study compares the effects of pembrolizumab with or without intismeran autogene following surgery. During the study, participants are closely monitored for disease-free survival over a period of up to approximately 97 months. Researchers will assess whether the cancer returns and evaluate overall safety. Participants undergo regular evaluations including clinical assessments and laboratory tests to monitor their health and treatment response throughout the study period.