Nieuwegein

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effects of nerandomilast in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) who have previously completed treatment with nerandomilast in earlier studies. The study aims to understand how well participants tolerate nerandomilast over time, and whether it helps improve lung function, delays symptom worsening, reduces hospital visits, or impacts survival. This is a Phase 3 open-label extension trial. Participants take nerandomilast tablets daily for up to 1 year and 10 months while continuing their usual pulmonary fibrosis treatments. The study follows an open-label design where all participants receive nerandomilast. There are no placebo or comparator groups in this extension phase. Throughout the study, participants regularly visit their doctors for health assessments and lung function tests. Doctors monitor any health problems or side effects experienced during treatment. The main outcome measured is whether participants experience any adverse events up to the final follow-up visit, which occurs at week 99. This close monitoring helps evaluate the long-term safety and potential benefits of nerandomilast in this patient group.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation (PFA) therapy for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) that does not respond to medication. The study compares PFA targeting pulmonary veins plus extra-PV sources identified by electrographic flow (EGF) mapping against PFA targeting pulmonary veins plus the left atrial posterior wall (PVI + PWA). The goal is to establish safety and to show that the new method is not less effective than the current approach in patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PersAF. Participants will receive treatment using several devices, including the FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation System, the OptiMap System for electrogram analysis, and the FARAWAVE NAV Catheter combined with the Opal HDx Mapping System for detailed heart mapping. All subjects will undergo electroanatomical mapping of the entire left atrium, followed by pulsed field ablation of the pulmonary veins, with additional ablation of either EGF-identified sources or the posterior wall, depending on the assigned treatment group. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety outcomes at 60 days and effectiveness outcomes at 365 days. They will receive a LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor to track heart rhythm continuously. Researchers will collect clinical data, imaging, and follow-up assessments to evaluate treatment impact and safety. The study includes ongoing follow-up visits to ensure thorough monitoring of heart function and study outcomes over one year.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of pelacarsen (TQJ230), given as a monthly injection under the skin, in people with mild to moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. This study aims to see if pelacarsen can safely slow the progression of this heart valve condition compared to a placebo. The trial is a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at multiple centers. Participants will receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo once a month. Before starting the treatment, they must have elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and be optimally treated for existing cardiovascular risk factors. The study focuses on those aged 50 to under 80 years with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. During the 36 months of participation, researchers will monitor changes in peak aortic jet velocity and aortic valve calcium score to assess disease progression. Safety, tolerability, and the impact of the treatment will be evaluated. Participants will undergo regular assessments, including laboratory tests and clinical evaluations, to track heart valve condition and overall health throughout the study.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the impact of two decision aids designed for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on how decisions about treatment are made and the quality of those decisions. The study focuses on patients diagnosed with RCC, including those with local (non-metastatic) disease and metastatic disease. Treatment options vary based on disease stage, tumor type, and patient preferences, with surgery being standard for local disease and targeted or immunotherapy for metastatic disease. Because treatment choices differ across hospitals and are not always fully explained, this study aims to improve shared decision-making using these aids. The intervention involves online interactive decision aids tailored for RCC patients. One decision aid targets patients with local disease, and the other addresses metastatic disease. These tools provide clear information about treatment options, including benefits and possible side effects, to help patients make informed choices together with their healthcare providers. The study design is a prospective multicenter pre-test post-test approach, comparing decision-making quality before and after implementing the aids. Participants will be patients clinically diagnosed with RCC who are facing treatment decisions covered by the decision aids. The study measures changes in shared decision-making quality using the OPTION-5 score during consultations. Additional assessments include patients' perceptions of decision-making quality, the decisions made, and how well the decision aids are used. This approach aims to enhance patient knowledge, reduce anxiety, align treatments with patient values, and standardize care. Written informed consent and the ability to complete questionnaires and interviews individually are required for participation.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received an anti-CD38 antibody and lenalidomide. The study compares the effectiveness of talquetamab combined with pomalidomide (Tal-P), talquetamab combined with teclistamab (Tal-Tec), and investigator's choice between two standard regimens: elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EPd), or pomalidomide with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd). This Phase 3 trial aims to understand which combination best controls the disease progression. Participants will receive talquetamab as a subcutaneous injection, pomalidomide orally, teclistamab as a subcutaneous injection, elotuzumab intravenously, dexamethasone either orally or intravenously, and bortezomib as a subcutaneous injection. The study involves comparing these combinations with varying administration routes. The trial includes multiple treatment arms to assess different drug combinations in patients who have undergone 1 to 4 prior therapies. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival up to 3 years and 5 months. Researchers will regularly assess disease status, treatment response, and safety. Participants' performance status will be evaluated, and adherence to treatment and potential side effects will be carefully tracked. This long-term observation will help determine how well each treatment combination controls the disease over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two doses of inhaled pirfenidone (called AP01) compared to a placebo in people with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). This Phase 2b study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving up to 300 participants who will continue their standard care during the 52-week trial. The goal is to see how well AP01 works and how safe it is when added to usual treatments for PPF. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: high-dose AP01, low-dose AP01, or placebo. All treatments are given as an oral inhalation solution twice daily. The study will last for 52 weeks, during which researchers will monitor and compare the effects of these treatments on lung function and disease progression. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and clinical evaluations to track their respiratory health. Researchers will check for changes in lung capacity and symptoms and monitor safety throughout the treatment period. The main outcome measured is the impact of AP01 doses compared to placebo after 52 weeks of treatment.

Multiple myeloma is a cancer affecting plasma cells in the bone marrow. Researchers are evaluating how well Immune Globulin Infusion (human), 10% (IGI, 10%) can help prevent infections in adults with multiple myeloma receiving B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3-directed bispecific antibody therapy. This phase 3 study aims to compare primary infection prevention using IGI, 10% versus secondary infection prevention in this patient group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the primary infection prevention group will receive IGI, 10% infusions for 12 months, while the secondary infection prevention group will receive IGI, 10% only if they develop a serious infection during the 12-month study period. The IGI, 10% is given intravenously. The study includes a screening period of up to 8 weeks, followed by treatment and monitoring. During the study, participants will attend 15 clinic visits if on a 4-week dosing schedule or 19 visits if on a 3-week dosing schedule, with total participation lasting up to 14 months. Researchers will monitor the time to first serious infection over 12 months. Participants will undergo evaluations to assess infection status and treatment safety throughout the study.

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a kidney disease caused by the build-up of immune protein complexes in the kidneys, leading to inflammation and possible kidney damage. This Phase 3 study is evaluating how well mezagitamab, compared to a placebo, reduces protein levels in the urine (proteinuria) in adults with primary IgAN. It also aims to assess the safety and tolerability of mezagitamab and its ability to maintain kidney function over the long term. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups in the main study: two-thirds will receive mezagitamab injections under the skin, and one-third will receive placebo injections that look identical but have no active medicine. Treatment will occur in two 1-year cycles, each including about six months of dosing and six months of observation with monthly check-ups. An open-label group will include a small number of participants with lower proteinuria or kidney filtering issues, including those who previously received mezagitamab in another study; these participants will receive mezagitamab similarly to the main group. During the study, participants will visit the clinic several times for assessments. Researchers will monitor changes in proteinuria from the start through week 36, along with safety and kidney function. They will also perform regular evaluations and check-ups throughout each treatment and observation period to track participants' health and response to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not candidates for or do not plan to have autologous stem cell transplant as initial therapy. The study compares the effectiveness of two new combination treatments: teclistamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide (Tec-DR), and talquetamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide (Tal-DR), against the standard treatment of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd). This is a Phase 3 randomized study designed to assess which treatment better controls the disease. Teclistamab, talquetamab, and daratumumab are given as subcutaneous injections, while lenalidomide is taken orally. Dexamethasone can be given either orally or by intravenous injection. Participants receive one of the three treatment combinations as assigned by the study. The treatments are administered regularly over the study period, with close monitoring and follow-up to evaluate outcomes. The study includes up to 9 years of follow-up to track disease progression and survival. Participants will undergo regular assessments including monitoring for disease progression and treatment response. Key measures include progression-free survival from the time of randomization and the presence of minimal residual disease-negative complete response at 12 months. Safety and tolerability are also tracked throughout the study. Total participation time includes treatment and extended observation to assess long-term outcomes and side effects.