Nieuwegein

Researchers are studying people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis IPF or progressive pulmonary fibrosis PPF who have previously taken nerandomilast in another study. The aim is to assess how well patients tolerate long-term treatment with nerandomilast and to evaluate whether it improves lung function and delays worsening symptoms, hospital visits, or death. This open-label extension trial is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim and focuses on treatment over an extended period. Participants take nerandomilast tablets for up to 1 year and 10 months while continuing their usual pulmonary fibrosis treatments. The study involves a single treatment group receiving the drug, and no placebo or comparison groups. Regular visits with doctors help monitor health and collect data during this extended treatment phase. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular lung function tests and health assessments to track any adverse events and changes in lung capacity. The main outcome measured is the occurrence of any adverse events for up to about 99 weeks. Secondary outcomes include changes in forced vital capacity and time to worsening of disease symptoms or hospitalization. The study includes ongoing safety monitoring with a total participation time of up to nearly two years.

This trial studies adults aged 50 to under 80 with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis and elevated lipoproteina levels. Researchers are assessing the safety, tolerability, and ability of pelacarsen TQJ230 given once monthly by injection to slow the progression of this heart valve condition. The study compares pelacarsen to a placebo in a randomized, double-blind design. Participants receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo as a subcutaneous injection monthly. They continue treatment and monitoring for up to 36 months to observe changes in heart valve narrowing and calcium buildup. The study also tracks lipoproteina levels and clinical heart-related events during this period. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including imaging to measure aortic valve function and calcium score, blood tests for lipoproteina, and monitoring for safety. The main outcomes analyzed after 36 months include changes in valve jet velocity and calcium score, alongside clinical events. Participants remain under medical care while being observed for any effects of the study drug or placebo.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of baxdrostat and dapagliflozin in people with chronic kidney disease CKD and high blood pressure hypertension. This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess whether this combination reduces the risk of serious kidney damage, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death compared to dapagliflozin alone. The study includes participants with CKD and hypertension who meet specific kidney function and blood pressure criteria. Participants who are not already taking SGLT2 inhibitors will first complete a 4-week dapagliflozin run-in period. Then, they will be randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or a placebo plus dapagliflozin. Baxdrostat dosing may start low and be increased if needed. Study visits will occur at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization, and then approximately every four months until the study ends, which is based on the number of key kidney or heart-related events. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including blood tests to monitor kidney function and potassium levels, blood pressure measurements, and evaluations of heart and kidney health. If participants stop the blinded study drug early, they will continue dapagliflozin if possible and remain in the study for ongoing visits and monitoring. The main outcome is whether the combination treatment reduces the risk of a 50% sustained decline in kidney function, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death over up to 37 months.

Researchers are evaluating the impact of two decision aids designed for patients with renal cell carcinoma RCC on how decisions about treatment are made and the quality of those decisions. This study focuses on both local non-metastatic and metastatic RCC, where treatment options vary widely depending on disease stage, tumor type, and patient preferences. The goal is to see how these decision aids affect shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals. The study compares usual care, where patients receive standard information, to care involving the use of two online interactive decision aidsone for local RCC and one for metastatic RCC. These aids explain treatment choices, outcomes, possible side effects, and benefits to help patients make informed decisions together with their doctors. The study is prospective and multicenter, involving groups before and after implementing the decision aids. Participants will be patients diagnosed with RCC who face treatment decisions covered by the aids. Assessments include observing shared decision-making during consultations and measuring decision quality, patient knowledge, and feelings about the decision process through questionnaires at intervals up to nine weeks after consultation. The study aims to evaluate changes in decision-making quality and how well the aids are implemented, with all data collected during and after consultations.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating how well JNJ-79635322 works compared with an anti-B-cell maturation antigen BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibody in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This phase 3 study includes participants who have received at least three prior therapies and have progressive disease or insufficient response to their last treatment. The study aims to assess treatment outcomes including overall response and progression-free survival over a period of up to 5 years and 7 months. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either JNJ-79635322 or teclistamab, both given as subcutaneous injections. Treatment continues until disease progression or intolerable side effects occur. These two groups allow comparison of the effects of each drug on disease control and patient well-being during the study. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments to monitor their response to treatment, including laboratory tests to measure disease markers and evaluations of symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Researchers will track adverse events, immune responses to the drugs, and long-term outcomes such as duration of response and overall survival. The total participation time can extend up to nearly 6 years, with ongoing monitoring of symptoms and quality of life throughout this period.

Multiple myeloma is a cancer of the plasma cells in the bone marrow. This phase 3 study is investigating how well Immune Globulin Infusion IGI, 10% helps prevent infections in adults with multiple myeloma who are receiving B-cell maturation antigen BCMA x cluster of differentiation 3 CD3 directed bispecific antibody therapy. The trial compares primary infection prevention using IGI, 10% with secondary prevention given only after a serious infection occurs. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The primary infection prevention group receives 400 mgkg IGI, 10% intravenously every 3 or 4 weeks for 12 months. The secondary infection prevention group receives the same dose and schedule only after they develop a serious infection during the 12-month study period. The dosing is given within 3 days after randomization and continues throughout the observation period. Participants will visit the study clinic 15 times if dosed every 4 weeks or 19 times if dosed every 3 weeks, for up to 14 months including an approximately 8-week screening. Assessments include monitoring time to first serious infection and rates of infections, antibiotic use, hospitalizations, and adverse events. Serum immunoglobulin levels and antibody responses are also measured. Safety and tolerability of IGI, 10% are evaluated during the 12-month treatment and follow-up.

This research aims to evaluate mezagitamab for adults with primary Immunoglobulin A nephropathy IgAN, a kidney disease caused by immune protein buildup leading to inflammation and potential kidney damage. The study will compare how mezagitamab affects protein levels in urine proteinuria against a placebo, focusing on safety, tolerability, and maintenance of kidney function over time. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive mezagitamab or a placebo injection subcutaneously over approximately 22 weeks in the main group, with a 21 ratio favoring mezagitamab. An open-label group includes participants with specific proteinuria or kidney filtration levels, including those from a prior related study, all receiving mezagitamab in the same manner. After treatment, participants will be observed for about 1.5 years with regular check-ups. During the study, participants will attend multiple clinic visits for treatment and monitoring. Researchers will measure changes in proteinuria at Week 36 as the primary outcome, as well as kidney filtration rates over one and two years. Safety and long-term kidney function will be closely monitored throughout the 2-year participation period.

This trial studies newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in participants who are not candidates for stem cell transplant. It compares the effects of two drug combinations teclistamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide Tec-DR, and talquetamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide Tal-DR, against the standard treatment of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone DRd. The goal is to assess how these combinations affect disease progression and treatment response. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either Tec-DR, Tal-DR, or DRd. Teclistamab and talquetamab are given as subcutaneous injections, daratumumab is given subcutaneously, lenalidomide is taken orally, and dexamethasone can be given orally or intravenously. Treatments are administered according to the study protocol over an extended period, with follow-up lasting up to nine years to monitor outcomes. During the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including disease progression monitoring, minimal residual disease status at 12 months, and assessments of response levels. Researchers also track survival, adverse events, laboratory and vital sign changes, quality of life, and drug concentrations. The study involves multiple visits for treatment and assessment to carefully evaluate the long-term impact of these drug combinations on patient health and disease control.

Researchers are evaluating whether combining tucatinib with trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 works better than standard treatments for people with HER2 positive colorectal cancer that has spread or cannot be removed by surgery. This Phase 3 study also aims to learn about the side effects that may occur when taking this combination of drugs. Participants have metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer and are randomly assigned to different treatment groups. Participants are randomly placed in one of two study groups. One group receives tucatinib taken orally twice daily along with trastuzumab given intravenously every 3 weeks and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy every 2 weeks. The other group receives standard care, which may be mFOLFOX6 alone or combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab, both given intravenously on different schedules. Tissue samples and biopsies are collected before treatment to confirm HER2 positivity and other markers. During the study, participants will have regular evaluations including imaging scans to measure cancer progression, blood tests, and assessments of side effects and quality of life. Progression-free survival is the primary outcome measured for up to about 3 years, with other outcomes like overall survival and response rate also tracked. Safety monitoring continues for about one year after the last treatment. The study lasts several years, with ongoing follow-up to understand long-term effects and benefits.