Marbella

This clinical study is testing a new medication, VH4524184, to see if it can effectively treat HIV-1 in adults who have never received treatment for their infection. The study is comparing two different doses of VH4524184, each taken with the medications emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF), to a standard HIV treatment called dolutegravir and lamivudine (DTG/3TC). The purpose of the study is to provide data on the long-term antiviral activity of the VH4524184 and provide information regarding dosing formulation for further evaluations.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining petosemtamab with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab alone as a first treatment for people with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1 positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This Phase 3, randomized, open-label study focuses on patients who have not received previous systemic therapy for incurable recurrent or metastatic disease, though prior therapy for locally advanced disease is allowed under certain conditions. The study excludes patients who have been treated with anti PD-(L)1 or anti-EGFR therapies except in specific cases. Participants will receive either the combination of petosemtamab plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone as their first-line treatment for this condition. The study includes detailed eligibility criteria based on tumor location, PD-L1 expression, health status, and prior treatments. Treatment effects will be observed over time with a focus on overall survival and tumor response rates measured according to standard criteria. During the study, participants will undergo assessments including tumor biopsies, imaging scans to measure disease progression, heart function tests, and evaluations of organ function. Safety and treatment response will be closely monitored up to approximately three years. The study also tracks overall survival and tumor response rate as primary outcomes, ensuring continuous follow-up and support throughout the trial period.

This research aims to evaluate the performance and safety of DMFI150, a device designed to treat nasolabial folds and wrinkles. The study involves 30 adult participants with moderate to severe nasolabial folds, focusing on assessing changes in wrinkle severity over time using validated aesthetic scales. Participants will receive a single injection treatment of DMFI150 targeting their nasolabial folds. The study closely monitors the effects of this treatment on wrinkle severity and overall safety throughout the study period. During the study, participants' wrinkle severity will be measured from baseline to 12 months using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) as evaluated by an investigator. Safety will also be assessed throughout the study. Participants will be observed for any side effects and overall treatment response during this time.

Researchers are conducting a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study to evaluate the performance and safety of DMFI300, a device for treating nasolabial folds and wrinkles. The study involves 30 adult participants who have moderate to severe nasolabial folds as measured by the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). The aim is to compare DMFI300 with a comparator device, Ellansé-M, using a split-face design where each participant receives both treatments on different sides of the face. Participants will receive injections of DMFI300 and Ellansé-M into their nasolabial folds. Treatments will be administered according to the study protocol, with each device applied to one side of the participant's face. The study will monitor wrinkle severity and overall safety throughout the treatment period. This blinded investigation ensures that neither participants nor evaluators know which side receives which treatment. During the 12-month study, participants will attend follow-up visits where evaluators will assess changes in wrinkle severity using the WSRS. Safety will be monitored throughout the study period to identify any adverse effects related to the devices. The primary outcome measured is the change from baseline in wrinkle severity as assessed by the evaluating investigator over the course of 12 months.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pirtobrutinib in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). The study focuses on two parts: Part 1 tests three different doses of pirtobrutinib in participants who have had 1 to 3 prior treatments, including a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Part 2 evaluates pirtobrutinib alone in participants who have not received prior treatment but have a specific genetic deletion called 17p. This is a phase 2, open-label, randomized study. Pirtobrutinib is given orally to participants in both study parts. Participants in Part 1 receive one of three dose levels, while those in Part 2 receive pirtobrutinib monotherapy. Part 1 participation lasts about 3 years, and Part 2 participation can last up to 2 years. The study compares the effects of different doses and treatment histories to better understand pirtobrutinib’s impact on CLL/SLL. Throughout the study, researchers monitor participants' overall response to treatment from the start up to 3 years. They assess safety and side effects, and participants are required to be able to swallow oral medication and have a performance status that allows them to participate. The study includes regular evaluations to determine how well the treatment controls the disease and to track any adverse events over the course of the study periods.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a combination treatment called triple therapy, which includes bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, and either atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. This study focuses on patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia who are at high or very high cardiovascular risk. The goal is to understand how well this combination lowers LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in a real-world clinical setting. The study observes patients who have already started triple therapy within the last four weeks. No drugs are administered as part of this study; instead, it monitors the ongoing treatment with bempedoic acid combined with ezetimibe and either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. The study measures LDL-C changes from baseline to eight weeks after starting triple therapy and continues follow-up for one year to assess lipid goal achievement, adherence to therapy, treatment changes, laboratory value shifts, and occurrence of cardiovascular events. Participants will have their LDL-C levels and other lab values assessed at baseline, eight weeks, and one year after starting triple therapy. Researchers will collect data on adverse events, adherence to treatment, and cardiovascular outcomes such as heart attack, stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, and coronary procedures during the follow-up year. The study also tracks treatment pathways and changes over this period to better understand real-world use and effectiveness of this triple therapy approach.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of bomedemstat (MK-3543) compared with the best available therapy (BAT) in adults with essential thrombocythemia (ET) who have not responded well to or cannot tolerate hydroxyurea. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to determine if bomedemstat provides a better durable clinicohematologic response in these participants. Participants will receive either bomedemstat as an oral capsule or one of the best available therapies, including anagrelide (oral capsule), busulfan (oral tablet), interferon alfa or its pegylated forms (subcutaneous solution), or ruxolitinib (oral tablet). The study involves a randomized, open-label design where treatments are compared directly. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for their hematologic response up to about 52 weeks. Assessments include platelet and neutrophil counts before starting treatment to ensure eligibility. Safety and efficacy are tracked to evaluate the long-term impact of the treatments on ET.

This research aims to evaluate how well brenipatide (LY3537031) is tolerated, what side effects may occur, and its safety and effectiveness in adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D). The study focuses on participants who meet specific IBS-D criteria related to bowel movement patterns and abdominal pain. It is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial lasting approximately 35 weeks. Participants will receive either brenipatide or a placebo, both administered under the skin through subcutaneous injection. The treatments are compared to assess their impact on IBS-D symptoms. The study involves careful monitoring of patients' responses to the medication over the treatment period, with no changes in diet allowed in the four weeks before screening. During the study, participants will track their symptoms daily using an electronic diary, including abdominal pain and stool consistency. Researchers will measure the percentage of days participants have a positive composite response between weeks 9 and 16. Safety and side effects will be monitored throughout the study, ensuring participants are closely observed during the full duration of about 35 weeks.

Multiple myeloma is a cancer affecting plasma cells in the bone marrow. Researchers are evaluating how well Immune Globulin Infusion (human), 10% (IGI, 10%) can help prevent infections in adults with multiple myeloma receiving B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3-directed bispecific antibody therapy. This phase 3 study aims to compare primary infection prevention using IGI, 10% versus secondary infection prevention in this patient group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the primary infection prevention group will receive IGI, 10% infusions for 12 months, while the secondary infection prevention group will receive IGI, 10% only if they develop a serious infection during the 12-month study period. The IGI, 10% is given intravenously. The study includes a screening period of up to 8 weeks, followed by treatment and monitoring. During the study, participants will attend 15 clinic visits if on a 4-week dosing schedule or 19 visits if on a 3-week dosing schedule, with total participation lasting up to 14 months. Researchers will monitor the time to first serious infection over 12 months. Participants will undergo evaluations to assess infection status and treatment safety throughout the study.