Fatih

This research evaluates how a structured productivity training program affects nurses' perceptions of job stress and their attitudes toward productivity. It is designed as a randomized controlled experimental study with measurements taken before the training, immediately after a three-week program, and three months later. The goal is to see if nurses who undergo the training report less job stress and more positive productivity attitudes than those who do not receive the training. The intervention involves a three-week productivity training program totaling 20 hours, including both theoretical and practical interactive sessions. Topics covered include understanding productivity in nursing, time and stress management, teamwork and process improvement, leadership, coping with job stress, psychological resilience, and the use of digital tools for efficiency. The methods used are lectures, simulations, case analyses, group discussions, exercises, and brainstorming to enhance nurses' skills related to productivity. Participants will complete assessments using a Personal Information Form, the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Productivity Scale, and the Perceived Job Stress Scale at baseline, immediately after training, and three months post-training. The study measures changes in nurses' attitudes and stress levels over this time. No additional interventions are given to the control group during the study period.

Researchers are evaluating remibrutinib (LOU064) in adolescents aged 12 to under 18 years who have chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is not well controlled by H1-antihistamines. This Phase 3 trial aims to assess the effectiveness, how the drug is processed in the body, and safety of remibrutinib compared to a placebo. The study also intends to gather long-term data on how well remibrutinib works and its safety over several years after treatment ends. The trial includes three periods. First, the core period is a 24-week double-blind phase where about two-thirds of participants receive remibrutinib and one-third receive placebo, with about 10 site visits over approximately 32 weeks. Next is an optional open-label extension lasting from one to three years, where participants who completed the core period may receive remibrutinib or enter an observational treatment-free phase depending on their symptoms. Participants may cycle through treatment and observational periods up to six times. Finally, an optional long-term treatment-free follow-up can last up to three years with one site visit and up to four phone calls. During the study, participants undergo assessments including changes in urticaria activity scores (UAS7), itching severity (ISS7), and hive severity (HSS7) measured from baseline to 12 weeks. Regular visits monitor safety, symptoms, and drug effects. The study tracks these measures to understand remibrutinib's impact on CSU symptoms and overall safety profile during and after treatment, with total participation potentially lasting several years.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of two different methods to expand the upper jaw (maxillary expansion) in children aged 6 to 12 years with maxillary transverse deficiency, a condition often linked to dental crowding and crossbite. This study compares a traditional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) technique with a modern digital method called Invisalign Palatal Expander (IPE), and also includes an untreated control group. The goal is to understand how these methods affect dental arch width, molar angulation, palatal surface area, palatal volume, and facial soft tissues. The study involves 60 children divided into three groups of 20 each. One group will use the Invisalign Palatal Expander, a removable nylon device made using 3D printing, activated at 0.25 mm increments until the desired expansion is reached, followed by a retention phase. Another group will use the acrylic cap splint RME appliance, which is bonded and activated at 0.5 mm per day until expansion goals are met, then retained. The third group will receive no treatment during the study period. Three-dimensional intraoral and extraoral scans will be taken at the end of expansion, at 3 months, and at 6 months to measure outcomes. Participants will have 3D scans to track changes in dental arch width, molar tipping, palatal surface area, and volume, as well as facial soft tissue changes such as nasal tip and cheekbone width. These measurements will be taken at baseline, after expansion, and during a 6-month retention period. Researchers will analyze the data to compare the effects of the two expansion methods and observe any soft tissue changes. The study also monitors patient cooperation and oral hygiene throughout the process.

Researchers are studying whether calderasib alone or combined with cetuximab can treat advanced solid tumors in people who have the KRAS G12C mutation. This phase 2, open-label trial aims to find out how many participants respond to these treatments and to compare their safety and tolerability. Participants receive calderasib by mouth and cetuximab through intravenous infusion. The study includes people with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors other than colorectal cancer, who have already undergone standard treatments. The trial monitors response and side effects over time as participants receive either calderasib alone or in combination with cetuximab. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments to measure tumor response and track any side effects or adverse events. Researchers record how many people experience treatment-related side effects and how many stop treatment due to these effects. The study follows participants for up to approximately 76 months to assess long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are studying a medicine called enlicitide to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in adults with high cholesterol (hyperlipidemia). This trial aims to find out if taking enlicitide together with rosuvastatin, a standard cholesterol-lowering drug, works better than a placebo in lowering LDL-C levels. The study is a Phase 3 trial that is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled to ensure accurate and unbiased results. Participants will receive oral tablets of enlicitide or placebo along with oral capsules of rosuvastatin or placebo. The study compares the effect of enlicitide plus rosuvastatin against placebo to evaluate their impact on LDL-C. The treatment period lasts 8 weeks, during which participants take their assigned medications as directed. During the study, researchers will measure the average percent change in LDL-C from the start of the trial to week 8. Participants will be monitored for safety and any side effects throughout the study. The total participation time includes screening, treatment, and follow-up assessments to evaluate the medicines' effects and safety in adults aged 18 to 64 with hyperlipidemia.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) alone or combined with other treatments in people with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study aims to understand how well patients tolerate the treatment, find a safe dose for combining I-DXd with other drugs, and measure prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels during treatment. The study is part of a larger master screening protocol and includes patients with confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma who have progressive disease despite prior therapies. Participants receive treatments including I-DXd given through intravenous infusion, sometimes combined with other drugs such as docetaxel (IV), MK-5684, abiraterone, or enzalutamide (all oral). Before each I-DXd dose, patients take premedication to prevent nausea and vomiting. The study includes both a safety lead-in phase and an efficacy phase, with ongoing monitoring for side effects and tolerability. The combination therapies are carefully dosed and scheduled according to the study protocol. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments to monitor side effects, measure PSA response, and track any dose-limiting toxicities. Safety is closely followed, particularly during the first 21 days for combination treatments, and throughout up to 54 months for long-term outcomes. Researchers also observe if participants discontinue treatment due to adverse events. The study requires ongoing visits and evaluations to ensure participant health and collect data on treatment effects over time.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for breast cancer that is hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), specifically in cases where the cancer is either locally advanced and cannot be removed by surgery or has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). The study aims to determine if patritumab deruxtecan (also called HER3-DXd or MK-1022) helps patients live longer overall or without the cancer growing compared to chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial focusing on this particular type of breast cancer. Participants receive one of several treatments: patritumab deruxtecan through intravenous infusion, chemotherapy options like paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel via IV, oral capecitabine tablets, liposomal doxorubicin via IV, or trastuzumab deruxtecan via IV infusion. The study compares the effects of patritumab deruxtecan alone to the treatment chosen by the physician. Treatments are administered according to standard dosing schedules during the trial. During the study, participants are monitored for how long they live without the cancer progressing (up to about 45 months) and overall survival (up to about 85 months). Researchers assess disease status through imaging and other evaluations. Participants have regular check-ups to monitor health, treatment effects, and any side effects. The study tracks treatment response and safety over the extended follow-up period to understand the benefits and risks of the therapies.

Researchers are evaluating tulisokibart as a potential treatment for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), a type of arthritis causing pain, stiffness, and inflammation in the spine and pelvis joints, visible on X-rays. This Phase 2b study aims to determine if different doses of tulisokibart improve symptoms better than a placebo, which looks like the study medicine but contains no active drug. The study has two main parts: a 16-week placebo-controlled period where participants receive either tulisokibart or placebo through subcutaneous injections, followed by a 124-week long-term extension divided into a 40-week main extension and an 84-week optional extension. This allows researchers to assess both the short-term and longer-term effects and safety of tulisokibart. Participants will be monitored for their response using the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 16 as the primary outcome. Throughout the study, researchers will evaluate disease activity and safety while tracking symptoms and any side effects. The total involvement spans up to 140 weeks, including both initial treatment and extension phases.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous ianalumab in adults with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. This Phase 2 study compares ianalumab with a placebo in participants diagnosed according to established classification criteria, focusing on those with active disease and specific autoantibodies. The goal is to better understand ianalumab's impact on this condition over a long treatment period. The study includes several phases: up to 6 weeks for screening, followed by a 52-week initial treatment period where participants receive either ianalumab or placebo by subcutaneous injection. After this, there is a second 52-week open-label treatment period where all participants receive ianalumab. Finally, a post-treatment follow-up period lasts at least 20 weeks and can extend up to 2 years after the last dose. Participants will undergo various assessments throughout the study, including evaluations of their skin condition using the rCRISS25 response at week 52. Safety and tolerability will also be closely monitored. The study involves regular visits for clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, and monitoring of disease activity and antibody status, with the total participation potentially lasting over two years including follow-up.