Cottingham

Researchers are investigating treatments for women with recurrent endometrial cancer that expresses different levels of the HER2 protein. The study has two groups based on the tumor's HER2 score: Cohort 1 includes patients with HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+ who have previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy, while Cohort 2 includes patients with HER2 IHC 3+. The purpose is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the investigational drug BNT323 (also called DB-1303) against chemotherapy in Cohort 1 and to evaluate BNT323 alone in Cohort 2. The study also looks at how the drug affects the immune system, the body's handling of the drug, quality of life, and potential side effects. Participants in Cohort 1 are randomly assigned to receive either BNT323 via intravenous infusion or a chemotherapy drug chosen by the investigator (doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or docetaxel if paclitaxel is unsuitable). Treatment continues until the cancer progresses, unacceptable side effects occur, or the participant withdraws consent. Those in Cohort 2 receive BNT323 alone until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria are met. The study includes a screening period, a treatment period expected to last about six months, followed by safety monitoring, efficacy follow-up, and long-term survival follow-up lasting up to approximately 53 months. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response by RECIST criteria, safety monitoring for adverse effects, and evaluations of quality of life. Researchers also study the pharmacokinetics of BNT323 and the immune response. The main outcomes measured are progression-free survival in Cohort 1 and objective response rate in Cohort 2. Safety follow-up ensures ongoing monitoring after treatment to evaluate longer-term effects and participant wellbeing.

Researchers are evaluating the use of epigenome-guided treatment selection compared to the usual standard-of-care (SOC) treatment in adults with active Crohn's Disease (CD) who are starting biologic therapy. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of this approach by comparing clinical remission and endoscopic response at Week 26. About 378 participants with active CD, defined by specific clinical and endoscopic criteria, will be included, with roughly half being biologic-naive and the other half exposed to no more than one prior biologic treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive biologic therapy guided by an epigenetic biomarker assay and the EpiPredict software, which predicts response to two biologics (Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab) or to receive treatment selected according to usual SOC without epigenome guidance. Biologic therapies will be administered following product labels and local SOC recommendations, with dose adjustments allowed as needed. Study assessments will follow the SOC schedule for each biologic during the 26-week treatment period, with different visit weeks depending on the biologic used. Participants will undergo blood sample collection for epigenetic testing during screening. Study visits will include clinical and endoscopic assessments at specified weeks, with long-term follow-up every six months up to 24 months after Week 26 using medical records and questionnaires. Researchers will measure outcomes related to clinical remission and endoscopic response, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Participants' adherence and ability to comply with protocol requirements will be monitored throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two doses of inhaled pirfenidone (called AP01) compared to a placebo in people with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). This Phase 2b study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving up to 300 participants who will continue their standard care during the 52-week trial. The goal is to see how well AP01 works and how safe it is when added to usual treatments for PPF. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: high-dose AP01, low-dose AP01, or placebo. All treatments are given as an oral inhalation solution twice daily. The study will last for 52 weeks, during which researchers will monitor and compare the effects of these treatments on lung function and disease progression. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and clinical evaluations to track their respiratory health. Researchers will check for changes in lung capacity and symptoms and monitor safety throughout the treatment period. The main outcome measured is the impact of AP01 doses compared to placebo after 52 weeks of treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the anti-tumor activity of amivantamab combined with pembrolizumab and carboplatin compared to pembrolizumab, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and platinum therapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) in participants with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This trial focuses on participants who have not received prior systemic treatment in the recurrent/metastatic setting. HNSCC is a type of cancer affecting the outer tissue layer of the mouth and throat and other head and neck regions. Participants will receive either amivantamab added to pembrolizumab and carboplatin or the standard care regimen of pembrolizumab, 5-FU, and a platinum agent (carboplatin or cisplatin). 5-FU will be given as an infusion over a 4-day period. The study is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing these treatment combinations. During the study, researchers will monitor overall survival and the objective response rate using standard tumor evaluation criteria for up to about 3 years and 7 months. Participants will undergo assessments to measure disease response, including imaging and other evaluations, to track how well the treatments work. Safety and side effects will also be monitored throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) compared to ibrutinib in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). The study includes participants who may have had prior treatment as well as treatment-nave participants with a specific genetic deletion (17p deletion). The study is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized trial designed to assess these treatments in different patient groups over varying durations. Participants receive either oral pirtobrutinib or oral ibrutinib. Part 1 compares these two drugs in participants with or without prior therapy, and participation can last up to six years. Part 2 focuses on pirtobrutinib alone in treatment-nave participants with 17p deletions, with participation lasting up to two years. The study carefully monitors responses to treatment, including complete and partial remissions. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to track their response to therapy, including measuring overall response rates from the start of treatment until disease progression or new treatments begin. Safety and organ function are monitored, and laboratory tests help evaluate blood counts and kidney function. The study aims to provide detailed information on how well the treatments work and their safety over the long term.

Researchers are evaluating zolbetuximab combined with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in adults with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. This study focuses on cancer cells that are HER2-negative but positive for the Claudin 18.2 protein and PD-L1, exploring how well zolbetuximab helps the immune system attack the tumor alongside immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The trial is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study designed to compare the overall survival of participants receiving zolbetuximab with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy versus those receiving a placebo with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. Participants receive study treatment in 6-week cycles, with zolbetuximab or placebo given by infusion every 2 or 3 weeks. Chemotherapy regimens include either CAPOX (capecitabine tablets and oxaliplatin infusion) or mFOLFOX6 (infusions of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin) administered on schedules matching the cycles. Pembrolizumab is infused every 3 or 6 weeks. Treatment continues until cancer worsens, is not tolerated, or another therapy is needed, with pembrolizumab given for up to 2 years. After initial cycles, some chemotherapy drugs are adjusted to only include oral capecitabine or certain infusions. During the study, participants visit the clinic for treatments, health checks, and scans to monitor cancer changes and side effects. Researchers also track medical problems related to the treatments and may collect tumor samples if cancer worsens. After stopping treatment, participants have follow-up visits and scans every 9 to 12 weeks, along with telephone check-ins every 3 months. The primary outcome measured is overall survival up to 72 months, with ongoing monitoring to evaluate safety and treatment effects.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of astegolimab compared to a placebo in adults aged 40 to 80 years who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study focuses on participants who are former or current smokers with a history of frequent COPD flare-ups. This phase III trial aims to determine how well astegolimab reduces moderate and severe COPD exacerbations over one year. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous astegolimab every two or four weeks or a placebo every two weeks. All participants will continue their optimized COPD maintenance treatments, which may include combinations of inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists, and long-acting muscarinic antagonists. Study treatments will be administered over a 52-week period. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor the annual rate of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations. Participants will undergo lung function tests, chest imaging, and assessments of breathlessness and lung health. The study will also carefully track the safety of the treatments, including any infections or heart-related problems. The total participation time is 52 weeks, during which the effectiveness and safety of astegolimab will be evaluated.

Researchers are comparing the length of time participants survive without signs of cancer returning after treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC). This Phase 3 study focuses on patients who have received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment and have specific FGFR mutations or fusions. The study aims to evaluate and compare disease-free survival between those treated with TAR-210 and those receiving intravesical chemotherapy chosen by the investigator. Participants will receive either TAR-210, a drug administered directly into the bladder, or one of two chemotherapy drugs, Mitomycin C or Gemcitabine, also given intravesically. All visible tumors must be fully removed before randomization. The study includes patients who are either unresponsive to BCG, experienced with BCG, or intolerant to BCG treatment. Participants must not be eligible for or must refuse radical cystectomy surgery. During the study, participants will be monitored for disease-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform assessments including urine testing, tumor tissue analysis, and biopsies as needed to confirm eligibility and monitor disease status. Safety, treatment adherence, and patient health status will be regularly evaluated to ensure ongoing suitability for the study.

This research aims to evaluate the long-term safety and explore the effectiveness of astegolimab in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have already completed a 52-week treatment in previous studies GB43311 or GB44332. The study focuses on participants aged 40 to 90 years and is a Phase III open-label extension trial designed to continue monitoring patients after their initial treatment period. Participants will receive astegolimab as a subcutaneous injection every two weeks during this extension study. This treatment continues from the prior placebo-controlled phase, allowing researchers to observe any ongoing effects and safety concerns over a longer period. The study does not include a placebo group during this extension phase, and all participants receive the active treatment. Throughout the study, researchers will closely monitor participants for any adverse events up to 12 weeks after the last dose of astegolimab. Participants will be assessed regularly to ensure their safety and to gather data on the treatment's long-term impact. The total duration of participant involvement depends on when they completed the parent studies but involves continued monitoring during and after the treatment period.