Hull

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

This research focuses on pediatric participants aged 6 to 17 years with obesity or overweight conditions. Its aim is to establish a framework to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drug treatments for managing chronic weight issues in this population. The study is part of a Phase 3 Master Protocol that includes multiple interventions and will report results when all intervention-specific arms finish. Participants may receive either Orforglipron, a drug given orally, or a placebo, also taken by mouth. Different intervention-specific arms may begin independently as new treatments become available for testing. The study sets clear entry criteria for newly enrolled participants across these intervention arms. During the study, researchers will monitor participants from baseline up to 72 weeks, focusing on the number of participants allocated to each intervention arm. They will also track safety and treatment effectiveness. Participation involves regular assessments of weight, health status, and any side effects, ensuring a thorough evaluation of the chronic weight management interventions over time.

Researchers are investigating whether encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can help reduce infections and mortality in adults with alcohol-related or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) cirrhosis. Cirrhosis, a severe scarring of the liver, is a growing health crisis, leading to high rates of early death, with infections being a major complication. Previous trials showed that FMT delivered endoscopically is safe, and this study aims to test a capsule form of FMT to improve patient outcomes without the need for invasive procedures. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either encapsulated FMT or placebo capsules that look identical. They will take five capsules every three months for up to 21 months or until they develop an infection requiring hospital admission. This double-blind trial will follow participants for up to 24 months to compare infection rates and time to hospitalization between the two groups. The study will also explore if FMT improves liver function, immune response, and reduces harmful bacteria linked to cirrhosis complications. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for infections and other cirrhosis-related complications through hospital visits and assessments. Researchers will measure the time until the first infection or decompensation leading to emergency or hospital admission. Laboratory tests will evaluate immune system changes and the presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The trial will last up to two years, aiming to provide insights into new, antibiotic-free treatments for cirrhosis and influence future care and policy.

Researchers are evaluating two different surgical approaches for total knee replacement in people with degenerative osteoarthritis. The study compares navigated kinematically aligned total knee replacements (KA TKR) with navigated mechanically aligned total knee replacements (MA TKR) to assess their impact on knee function and range of motion (ROM). The goal is to determine which alignment method better improves knee function and alignment after surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either KA TKR or MA TKR, both performed using navigation technology. KA TKR aims to restore the natural joint lines and knee movement, while MA TKR focuses on aligning the knee components to the mechanical axis of the leg. Both groups will receive patella resurfacing during surgery. Surgeries will use the Columbus TKR implant, and all procedures will be done under anesthesia in an operating room. Participants will be followed up for one year after surgery. During the study, participants will complete questionnaires and undergo assessments before surgery, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Evaluations include knee function scores (KOOS), range of motion, stability, pain levels, and x-rays to assess alignment. Compliance with follow-up visits will be monitored, and any complications will be recorded. The study will analyze changes in knee function over 12 months to compare outcomes between the two surgical methods.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of divarasib combined with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin. The study focuses on adults with advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific KRAS G12C mutation. This is a Phase III trial aiming to improve first-line treatment options for these patients. Participants will receive one of two treatment combinations. One group will take divarasib orally once daily along with pembrolizumab given through an intravenous infusion every three weeks. The other group will receive pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin, all administered by intravenous infusion every three weeks. Treatment schedules and dosages are carefully monitored during the study. Throughout the study, participants will be regularly assessed for progression-free survival and overall survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately five years. Researchers will perform various evaluations including tumor measurements and safety monitoring. This long-term observation helps to understand the treatments' effects and safety over time, supporting informed decisions for future lung cancer therapies.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two different dose schedules of pegozafermin compared to a placebo in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have liver fibrosis at stage F2 or F3. This phase 3 study focuses on improving liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis in this patient group, which involves chronic liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction. Participants will receive either pegozafermin or a placebo through subcutaneous injections. The study compares two doses of pegozafermin to assess their impact on liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis. The treatment period lasts up to 52 weeks, with outcomes measured at this time point. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvements in liver fibrosis and resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening fibrosis by week 52. Researchers will also track the time until any disease progression occurs, up to 5 years. Throughout the trial, safety and efficacy will be carefully assessed through clinical evaluations and laboratory tests to ensure participant well-being.

Researchers are observing the use of the drug elafibranor in people with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), a rare and progressive liver disease where bile ducts are damaged. This damage can lead to scarring of the liver (cirrhosis) and is often linked with symptoms like itching and fatigue. If PBC worsens, it may require a liver transplant or could be fatal without one. The study aims to understand how effective, safe, and tolerable elafibranor is for those being treated in everyday clinical settings. Participants in this study will be those who have been diagnosed with PBC and are either starting or already receiving treatment with commercial elafibranor at a dose of 80 mg per day. The study is non-interventional, meaning it observes participants as they receive their usual care without altering treatment. The total study duration for each participant is approximately 60 months, or 5 years. During the study, researchers will gather information about participants’ responses to treatment, safety, and tolerability over time. Outcome measurements include the percentage of participants who respond to treatment after 6 months. Participants and their caregivers may complete questionnaires, and researchers will monitor treatment effects and side effects throughout the study period to better understand how elafibranor works in real-world use.

Researchers are comparing how long participants with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer remain disease-free and their overall survival time when treated with two different regimens. This phase 3 study focuses on patients who have previously received chemotherapy. The study aims to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival in participants receiving amivantamab plus FOLFIRI versus cetuximab or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. The study involves two treatment groups: one receiving amivantamab combined with chemotherapy drugs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and the other receiving either cetuximab or bevacizumab with the same chemotherapy regimen. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these treatment arms. The treatments will be administered according to protocol to assess their effects on the cancer. Participants will be monitored for up to 2 years and 1 month to measure progression-free survival through blinded independent central review and followed for overall survival for up to 4 years and 4 months. The study includes assessments of tumor response, safety, and other clinical evaluations. Tissue samples and detailed clinical data will also be collected. This comprehensive monitoring will help determine the comparative effectiveness of the treatment options over time.

This trial is focused on adults with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type unresectable or metastatic left-sided colorectal cancer. It compares the length of time participants remain free from disease progression when treated with amivantamab combined with chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI) versus cetuximab combined with the same chemotherapy regimens. The study is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate progression-free survival over a period of up to 4 years and 2 months. Participants receive either amivantamab with chemotherapy drugs including 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan hydrochloride, or cetuximab with the same chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI). Treatments are administered as first-line therapy for their colorectal cancer. The trial assesses how these treatments affect disease progression and survival. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly through assessments and evaluations to measure progression-free survival. Researchers will gather data via blinded independent central review to ensure unbiased assessment of disease status. Participants are followed up for safety and treatment efficacy over the study duration, which may last over four years.

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a kidney disease caused by the build-up of immune protein complexes in the kidneys, leading to inflammation and possible kidney damage. This Phase 3 study is evaluating how well mezagitamab, compared to a placebo, reduces protein levels in the urine (proteinuria) in adults with primary IgAN. It also aims to assess the safety and tolerability of mezagitamab and its ability to maintain kidney function over the long term. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups in the main study: two-thirds will receive mezagitamab injections under the skin, and one-third will receive placebo injections that look identical but have no active medicine. Treatment will occur in two 1-year cycles, each including about six months of dosing and six months of observation with monthly check-ups. An open-label group will include a small number of participants with lower proteinuria or kidney filtering issues, including those who previously received mezagitamab in another study; these participants will receive mezagitamab similarly to the main group. During the study, participants will visit the clinic several times for assessments. Researchers will monitor changes in proteinuria from the start through week 36, along with safety and kidney function. They will also perform regular evaluations and check-ups throughout each treatment and observation period to track participants' health and response to treatment.