Search Bar & Filters
Found 5 Actively Recruiting clinical trials
Actively Recruiting
Researchers are studying patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma who have no metastases and are eligible for surgery aimed at curing the cancer. This observational study is designed to explore whether there is a connection between extramural venous invasion (EMVI) seen on imaging and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which could help understand how metastatic disease spreads through blood vessels. During the study, two blood samples of 20ml each will be taken from every participant: one before surgery and another during or within 24 hours after surgery. Patients must have completed their pre-operative staging scan within six weeks before surgery. The study includes patients with both mrEMVI positive and negative tumors, with blood samples collected accordingly. Participants will be followed up annually for up to three years after surgery. Researchers will monitor blood samples and imaging results to determine the relationship between EMVI status and ctDNA levels. This long-term follow-up aims to gather evidence on the possible vascular spread of cancer cells and its impact on patient outcomes.
Actively Recruiting
This research aims to assess whether adding MRI imaging to the standard CT imaging for patients with suspected or confirmed sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma influences treatment decisions. The study compares standard preoperative CT and multidisciplinary team discussions against adding MRI scans to see if MRI identifies more high-risk tumors, potentially changing treatment plans and prognosis information. Participants are randomly assigned to either the control group receiving standard care with CT imaging or the intervention group receiving an additional MRI scan before surgery. Both groups undergo multidisciplinary team reviews based on their imaging results. The intervention involves extra radiological and pathological assessments and reporting that might affect treatment choices following local protocols. Participants are followed up at 1 and 3 years after recruitment, including quality of life questionnaires. The study measures differences in cancer staging on CT versus MRI and how these differences impact treatment strategies. The total follow-up duration extends up to three years after the last participant is recruited, ensuring long-term observation of outcomes and treatment effects.
Actively Recruiting
Researchers are studying patients who have survived a heart attack (myocardial infarction) and are at higher risk for sudden cardiac death caused by dangerous heart rhythms. This study focuses on patients with a severely reduced heart function measured by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35% or less. Previous landmark trials showed that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improved survival compared to medical therapy alone, but since then, new medications have decreased sudden death rates and the need for ICD therapy. Because ICDs carry risks and costs, this study aims to compare modern optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone versus OMT with ICD implantation to see if medical therapy without ICD is not worse for patient survival. Participants will be divided into two groups: one receiving OMT only and the other receiving OMT plus an ICD device. The ICD options include transvenous ICDs, subcutaneous defibrillators, or a newer extravascular ICD with substernal lead placement. OMT will follow current European guidelines for managing coronary syndromes and heart failure. The study is designed to assess outcomes over time from the point of randomization. During the study, researchers will track survival by measuring the time until death from any cause, expecting about 15 months of follow-up after the last participant joins. Patients must have a history of heart attack at least three months prior, symptomatic heart failure, and have been on OMT for at least three months before enrollment. Safety and effectiveness of treatments will be monitored closely throughout the study period.
Actively Recruiting
Researchers are evaluating the effects of two different default dialysate sodium concentrations, 137 mmol/l and 140 mmol/l, on major cardiovascular events and death in adults receiving maintenance haemodialysis. This pragmatic, cluster-randomised, open-label study takes place in real-world dialysis sites and aims to compare the outcomes associated with these sodium levels over an extended period. The study focuses on patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing regular haemodialysis treatment. Dialysis sites are randomly assigned to use either a default dialysate sodium concentration of 137 mmol/l or 140 mmol/l for at least 90% of dialysis sessions at that site. All other care practices continue as usual based on local standards. The study plans to recruit sites over 5 to 7 years, with individual follow-up lasting roughly 2 to 5 years. Site participation requires consent, while individual patient consent may be waived or offered an opt-out option. Participants will be monitored for major cardiovascular events and death, with the primary outcome measuring the time until the first such event occurs. Data collection methods are implemented across participating dialysis units, focusing only on in-center or satellite dialysis patients where applicable. The study's duration depends on the occurrence of endpoints, with an average follow-up of about 5 years anticipated per participant.
Actively Recruiting
Researchers are evaluating a range of treatments to improve outcomes for adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including cases caused by influenza and COVID-19. This Phase 3 adaptive platform trial, REMAP-CAP, is designed to test multiple treatment strategies simultaneously and adapt over time, allowing new treatments to be added as questions are answered. The trial also serves as a platform to quickly evaluate treatments during respiratory pandemics, such as COVID-19, through a sub-study called REMAP-COVID in the United States. Participants receive various interventions including antibiotics like ceftriaxone, moxifloxacin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, as well as macrolide therapies given for different durations. Other treatments assessed include corticosteroids such as hydrocortisone and dexamethasone, antiviral agents like oseltamivir and remdesivir, immune modulators including tocilizumab and baricitinib, and supportive care strategies such as mechanical ventilation methods. Dosing and duration vary for each treatment, with some interventions now closed. Treatments are administered according to local guidelines and clinical decisions, with some requiring intravenous or enteral routes. Participants are closely monitored with assessments focusing on survival and organ support status in the ICU up to 90 days after enrollment. The main outcomes measured include all-cause mortality by day 90 and the number of days alive without needing organ support in the ICU by day 21. The study collects data continuously to adapt treatment assignments for new participants, aiming to identify the most effective therapies. Follow-up and safety monitoring continue throughout hospitalization and up to 90 days after admission.