Sutton In Ashfield

Researchers are evaluating new treatments for men with prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body and still responds to hormone therapy. This Phase 3 trial compares two additional therapies with the best standard care to see if they slow cancer spread and improve survival. Participants from diverse backgrounds across multiple UK hospitals are involved, and the study is managed by University College London. The trial has two main comparisons. In Comparison S, participants receive either standard care alone or with added targeted high-dose radiotherapy (Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy or SABR) aimed at metastatic lesions. In Comparison P, participants receive standard care alone or with a radioactive drug (177Lu-PSMA-617) that targets prostate cancer cells. Standard care includes long-term hormone-reducing therapy and may include other approved medications or treatments. Treatments are given according to specific schedules: SABR is delivered in 3-5 sessions over 1-2 weeks, while 177Lu-PSMA-617 is given in up to three 6-week cycles. Participants are randomly assigned to either standard care or the new treatment with equal chance. During the study, participants undergo regular scans and tests to monitor cancer and side effects. Doctors track treatment safety and may stop treatment if side effects become serious or participants choose to stop. The main outcome measured is overall survival, with final results expected around 5 to 7 years after the first patient starts treatment. Participants' health status and response to treatment are closely observed throughout the study period.

This research aims to evaluate how well brenipatide (LY3537031) is tolerated, what side effects may occur, and its safety and effectiveness in adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D). The study focuses on participants who meet specific IBS-D criteria related to bowel movement patterns and abdominal pain. It is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial lasting approximately 35 weeks. Participants will receive either brenipatide or a placebo, both administered under the skin through subcutaneous injection. The treatments are compared to assess their impact on IBS-D symptoms. The study involves careful monitoring of patients' responses to the medication over the treatment period, with no changes in diet allowed in the four weeks before screening. During the study, participants will track their symptoms daily using an electronic diary, including abdominal pain and stool consistency. Researchers will measure the percentage of days participants have a positive composite response between weeks 9 and 16. Safety and side effects will be monitored throughout the study, ensuring participants are closely observed during the full duration of about 35 weeks.

A Phase 3b, open-label, single-arm, rollover study to evaluate the long-term safety of luspatercept, to the following participants: * Participants receiving luspatercept on a parent protocol at the time of their transition to the rollover study, who tolerate the protocol-prescribed regimen in the parent trial and, in the opinion of the investigator, may derive clinical benefit from continuing treatment with luspatercept * Participants in the follow-up phase previously treated with luspatercept or placebo in the parent protocol will continue into long-term post-treatment follow-up in the rollover study until the follow-up commitments are met * The study design is divided into the Transition Phase, Treatment Phase and Follow-up Phase. Participants will enter transition phase and depending on their background will enter either the treatment phase or the Long-term Post-treatment Follow-up (LTPTFU) phase * Transition Phase is defined as one Enrollment visit * Treatment Phase: For participants in luspatercept treatment the dose and schedule of luspatercept in this study will be the same as the last dose and schedule in the parent luspatercept study. This does not apply to participants that are in long-term follow-up from the parent protocol * Follow-up Phase includes: \- 42 Day Safety Follow-up Visit * During the Safety Follow up, the participants will be followed for 42 days after the last dose of luspatercept, for the assessment of safety-related parameters and adverse event (AE) reporting \- Long-term Post-treatment Follow-up (LTPTFU) Phase * Participants will be followed for overall survival every 6 months for at least 5 years from first dose of luspatercept in the parent protocol, or 3 years of post-treatment from last dose, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a subject is lost to follow-up. Participants will also be monitored for progression to AML or any malignancies/pre-malignancies. New anticancer or disease related therapies should be collected at the same time schedule Participants transitioning from a parent luspatercept study in post-treatment follow-up (safety or LTPTFU) will continue from the same equivalent point in this rollover study. The ACE-536-LTFU-001 rollover study will be terminated, and relevant participants will discontinue from the study when all participants fulfill 5 years on the study, including treatment and follow-up.

WAYFIND-R is a global registry focused on collecting high-quality real-world data from cancer patients diagnosed with solid tumors who have undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. The registry aims to support clinical and epidemiological research, generate evidence to better understand health outcomes and cancer care, and describe treatments and clinical courses for these patients. Participants must be adults diagnosed with any type of solid tumor at any disease stage and have had NGS testing within three months before enrollment. The study collects data without assigning specific treatments or interventions, instead tracking clinical characteristics and outcomes over time. During the study, researchers will gather information linking NGS results to treatments and patient outcomes, including overall survival for up to five years from enrollment. Participants provide informed consent, and data collected will help improve understanding of solid tumor cancers and their management in real-world settings.

This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm of the study is 7 years. Eligible patients must have intermediate-high or high risk of recurrence as defined by specified clinical and biologic criteria. Concurrent use of abemaciclib is permitted in both arms. The primary endpoint of the study is Invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) and main secondary endpoints include Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), Overall survival (OS), Safety and Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs). Patients will be followed for 10 years from randomization of the last patient.

Researchers are evaluating the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). This Phase 3 trial aims to compare a fixed extended duration of 28 days of antibiotics to the current standard care durations, which typically range from 7 to 18 days. The study will assess clinical outcomes, quality of life, and cost effectiveness over a 180-day follow-up period to determine which approach may better reduce treatment failure and improve patient care while considering antimicrobial resistance concerns. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the standard care group, where antibiotic type and duration are determined by their clinician, or the fixed extended-duration group, which receives antibiotics for a set 28-day period. The study includes a total of 1166 adult patients recruited from intensive care units and hospital wards across approximately 30 NHS trust hospitals. The treatment period is followed by monitoring up to 180 days after randomization. During the study, patients or their personal consultees will complete quality of life questionnaires at baseline and at 30, 60, and 180 days post-randomization. They will also provide information about antibiotic use and healthcare resource utilization. Researchers will collect hospital records on admissions, relapses, and further infections. The main outcome measured is treatment failure within 180 days of randomization, with safety and effectiveness assessed throughout the follow-up period.

Researchers are evaluating a range of treatments to improve outcomes for adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including cases caused by influenza and COVID-19. This Phase 3 adaptive platform trial, REMAP-CAP, is designed to test multiple treatment strategies simultaneously and adapt over time, allowing new treatments to be added as questions are answered. The trial also serves as a platform to quickly evaluate treatments during respiratory pandemics, such as COVID-19, through a sub-study called REMAP-COVID in the United States. Participants receive various interventions including antibiotics like ceftriaxone, moxifloxacin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, as well as macrolide therapies given for different durations. Other treatments assessed include corticosteroids such as hydrocortisone and dexamethasone, antiviral agents like oseltamivir and remdesivir, immune modulators including tocilizumab and baricitinib, and supportive care strategies such as mechanical ventilation methods. Dosing and duration vary for each treatment, with some interventions now closed. Treatments are administered according to local guidelines and clinical decisions, with some requiring intravenous or enteral routes. Participants are closely monitored with assessments focusing on survival and organ support status in the ICU up to 90 days after enrollment. The main outcomes measured include all-cause mortality by day 90 and the number of days alive without needing organ support in the ICU by day 21. The study collects data continuously to adapt treatment assignments for new participants, aiming to identify the most effective therapies. Follow-up and safety monitoring continue throughout hospitalization and up to 90 days after admission.

People with type 1 diabetes can develop heart failure, which causes symptoms like breathlessness, tiredness, and ankle swelling, reducing quality of life and leading to hospital admissions or serious outcomes. This trial is investigating whether the tablet sotagliflozin can improve quality of life for people with type 1 diabetes and heart failure. Previous studies showed benefits of sotagliflozin in type 2 diabetes patients with heart failure, but its effects on type 1 diabetes patients with heart failure are unknown. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sotagliflozin tablets or placebo tablets once daily for 4 months, and neither the participants nor the medical team will know who receives which treatment until the trial ends. The trial plans to enroll 320 people with type 1 diabetes and heart failure symptoms at multiple UK sites. The total participation time is approximately 6 months, with the entire trial expected to last 26 months. During the study, participants will use continuous glucose monitors and be regularly assessed for heart failure symptoms and quality of life using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Researchers will monitor changes in questionnaire scores from baseline to week 16 as the primary outcome. Safety and tolerability of sotagliflozin will also be evaluated throughout the trial, with ongoing monitoring for any adverse effects or changes in health status.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung condition affecting about 10% of adults worldwide, with a prevalence of 4.5% in those aged 40 years and older in the UK. Exacerbations, or sudden worsening episodes often triggered by infections, can lead to hospital admissions and carry risks of increased illness and death. This trial focuses on the high-risk 90-day period after hospital discharge, during which patients have a 43% chance of readmission and 12% risk of mortality. The study aims to test whether a supported rescue pack management plan can reduce readmissions by 20%. This is a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 1400 patients across 30 NHS trusts.

The trial investigates the role of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who have previously undergone autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled study aims to evaluate whether adding a proteasome inhibitor to the salvage ASCT conditioning improves the depth of response, and to assess the impact of consolidation and maintenance treatments on the durability of response. The study also looks at overall survival, progression time, quality of life, and treatment safety among participants with measurable disease and good performance status. All participants first receive re-induction therapy consisting of 4 to 6 cycles of ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (ITD) over 28-day cycles to achieve maximum disease control. Those who reach stable disease or better are randomized to receive either conventional ASCT using melphalan or augmented ASCT combining melphalan with ixazomib. Following this, participants who maintain minimal response or better undergo a second randomization to either receive consolidation therapy with 2 cycles of ITD followed by ixazomib maintenance until disease progression, or no further treatment. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including blood tests, disease response evaluations, and monitoring for adverse effects. The primary outcomes measured are overall response rate 100 days after ASCT and progression-free survival up to 10 years. Secondary evaluations include overall survival, time to disease progression, minimal residual disease status at various stages, engraftment kinetics, and quality of life. Follow-up continues with clinic visits every three months until disease progression is observed, enabling long-term monitoring of treatment effects and safety.