Los Alamitos

Researchers are evaluating new treatments for people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC), a type of bladder cancer that has not spread to the muscle but has a high chance of worsening or returning. This cancer type may include carcinoma in situ (CIS), which is a flat, surface-level bladder cancer. The study aims to learn whether adding intismeran autogene (V940), a treatment designed to boost the immune system's attack on cancer, to the standard Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy can help people live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back. Participants will receive either the combination of V940 with BCG or BCG alone. BCG is given as a bladder instillation, while V940 is given as an intramuscular injection. The study is phase 2, open-label, and randomized. As of a 2026 amendment, outcome measures for a monotherapy arm of V940 are no longer primary or secondary. Treatment is focused on Cohort A, which includes people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who are BCG-naïve or meet specific recurrence criteria. During the study, participants will be monitored for event-free survival for up to approximately 5 years. Researchers will assess how long participants live without the cancer worsening or returning. The study includes regular evaluations, imaging, and safety monitoring. The total duration of participation depends on individual outcomes and follow-up but includes long-term observation to assess treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are investigating the similarity in pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, effectiveness, safety, and immune response of HLX17 compared to US-sourced Keytruda® in patients who have had surgery for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, or renal cell carcinoma. This Phase I, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study aims to compare these two treatments in people with these resected solid tumors to better understand their performance and safety profiles. Participants will receive either HLX17 or US-sourced Keytruda®, each given at a dose of 200 mg on the first day of every 3-week cycle. The study is designed with parallel groups, where each participant receives one of the treatments across multiple cycles. The dosing schedule continues through six cycles, and the two treatments are directly compared under controlled conditions. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored closely with various assessments including laboratory tests and evaluations of organ function to ensure safety. The main outcomes measured are drug exposure over time from the first dose to 21 days after the initial and sixth doses. Participants are expected to have a performance status of 0 and a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. Safety and immunogenicity will also be evaluated, with follow-up to monitor any side effects or immune responses during and after treatment.

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining baxdrostat with dapagliflozin compared to dapagliflozin alone in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high blood pressure. This Phase III, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to see if this combination reduces risks such as significant kidney function decline, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death. The study includes a 4-week run-in period where participants not previously treated with SGLT2 inhibitors receive dapagliflozin alone. After this, participants are randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or placebo plus dapagliflozin in a double-blinded manner. Study visits occur frequently initially (at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization) and then approximately every 4 months. If participants stop the blinded treatment early, they continue dapagliflozin alone unless specific criteria require its discontinuation. Participants will undergo regular assessments including blood pressure monitoring and laboratory tests related to kidney function and cardiovascular health. The primary outcome measures the reduction in risk of major kidney and heart events over up to 37 months. Even if participants stop the study treatment, they will continue follow-up visits and data collection to ensure comprehensive safety and efficacy evaluation throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of HLX22 combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy as the first treatment for patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gastric or gastroesophageal junction. This phase 2, double-blind, randomized, and multiregional study compares this combination against trastuzumab and chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab. The study aims to measure how well the treatments work in controlling the disease and improving survival for up to five years. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives HLX22 at 15 mg/kg every three weeks along with trastuzumab, chemotherapy (XELOX regimen), and possibly a placebo for pembrolizumab. The other group receives a placebo for HLX22 plus trastuzumab, chemotherapy (XELOX), and possibly pembrolizumab every three weeks. Treatment continues until the disease worsens, unacceptable side effects occur, withdrawal of consent, or other protocol-specified reasons. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including tumor scans reviewed by an independent committee to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival over up to five years. Other evaluations include safety monitoring and organ function tests. The study tracks how long patients live without disease progression and overall survival, aiming to better understand the benefits and risks of HLX22 combined with current standard treatments.

This trial investigates the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with fluoropyrimidine and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) compared to trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab in adults with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 with a combined positive score of 1 or higher. Additionally, rilvegostomig combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy is studied separately to understand each component's contribution. This Phase 2, randomized, open-label, global study is conducted at 200-250 sites in about 25 countries. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three arms: Arm A receives rilvegostomig, fluoropyrimidine, and T-DXd; Arm B receives trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab; Arm C receives rilvegostomig, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy. Treatments are administered mostly by intravenous infusion every three weeks, with capecitabine given orally twice daily. The study compares these treatment regimens to evaluate their effects on the cancer. Throughout the study, participants undergo assessments including tumor measurements, organ function tests, and heart function evaluation to ensure safety and monitor disease progression. The main outcomes measured are progression-free survival and overall survival for up to approximately six years. Researchers will also monitor adverse events and overall health status during and after treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of utidelone combined with capecitabine in patients who have HER2-negative breast cancer with brain metastases. This is a pivotal Phase II multicenter clinical trial that aims to assess both intracranial and systemic treatment effects in this patient population. The study focuses on comparing utidelone alone and utidelone with capecitabine to determine their impacts on brain metastases and overall disease control. Participants will receive utidelone intravenously once daily for five consecutive days every 21 days. In combination treatment groups, capecitabine is taken orally twice daily for days 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. Different dosing regimens of utidelone (25 or 30 mg/m2) combined with a fixed capecitabine dose (1000 mg/m2) are evaluated. Treatment cycles repeat every 21 days, and patients may receive multiple cycles as part of the study. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including brain MRI scans to measure intracranial tumor response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria over 12 months. Researchers will monitor safety, side effects, and systemic disease progression. Patients’ blood and organ function will be checked to ensure treatment tolerance. The main outcome is the intracranial objective response rate after treatment, with ongoing monitoring to evaluate both efficacy and safety throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effect and safety of different doses of a new medicine called NNC0662-0419 in people living with type 2 diabetes. This study compares NNC0662-0419 to a placebo or to semaglutide, an approved medication for type 2 diabetes. The goal is to determine if NNC0662-0419 is effective and safe for treating this condition in a phase 2 dose-finding study. Participants will receive one of the three treatments: NNC0662-0419, semaglutide, or placebo, all given by weekly subcutaneous injections. The treatment assignment is randomized, meaning participants are assigned to their group by chance. The study tests different doses of NNC0662-0419 to find the best dose for treating type 2 diabetes. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in participants' blood sugar levels by measuring glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at weeks 16, 28, and 40 compared to the start of the study. Participants will be regularly assessed for safety and treatment effects. The study includes adults aged 18 to 75 years and tracks the impact of the treatments over several months.