Redding

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two doses of inhaled pirfenidone (called AP01) compared to a placebo in people with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). This Phase 2b study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving up to 300 participants who will continue their standard care during the 52-week trial. The goal is to see how well AP01 works and how safe it is when added to usual treatments for PPF. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: high-dose AP01, low-dose AP01, or placebo. All treatments are given as an oral inhalation solution twice daily. The study will last for 52 weeks, during which researchers will monitor and compare the effects of these treatments on lung function and disease progression. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and clinical evaluations to track their respiratory health. Researchers will check for changes in lung capacity and symptoms and monitor safety throughout the treatment period. The main outcome measured is the impact of AP01 doses compared to placebo after 52 weeks of treatment.

Researchers are evaluating KT-621, an oral drug, in adults with uncontrolled moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma. This Phase 2b study aims to assess the safety, tolerability, and how well KT-621 works in treating this condition. The study also looks at how KT-621 behaves in the body to better understand its effects. Participants will receive either KT-621 or a matching oral placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. The study focuses on assessing various doses to find the most effective and safe amount. Treatment effects will be measured over 12 weeks to observe changes in lung function and asthma control. During the study, participants will undergo regular visits including lung function tests (pre-bronchodilator FEV1), asthma control questionnaires, and blood tests to monitor eosinophil levels. Researchers will track participants’ adherence through electronic diaries and assess safety throughout the study. The main outcome is the change in lung function from baseline to Week 12, with continuous monitoring to ensure participant safety and study integrity.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tezepelumab in adults aged 40 to 80 years with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Participants must have experienced at least two moderate or one severe COPD exacerbations in the year before joining and be receiving inhaled maintenance therapy. The study focuses on adults who continue to experience symptoms despite current treatments and aims to assess the impact of tezepelumab on COPD exacerbations. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of either one of two doses of tezepelumab or a placebo. Treatment will last for a minimum of 52 weeks and may extend up to 76 weeks. After the treatment period, there will be a 12-week safety follow-up phase to monitor participants after stopping the study drug. The study compares tezepelumab to placebo to determine its efficacy and safety over this extended period. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor their COPD status and any exacerbations. The main outcome measured is the annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations from the start of treatment through up to 76 weeks. Safety and tolerability will also be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. This long-term involvement ensures comprehensive data on how tezepelumab affects COPD progression and exacerbation frequency.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether ibuzatrelvir is effective and safe in adults and adolescents with COVID-19 who do not need to be in the hospital but who are at high risk for progression to severe disease. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (by chance) to receive ibuzatrelvir or matching placebo orally for 5 days. Co-administration of locally available standard of care is allowed. The total duration of the study is around 6 months.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of muvalaplin on reducing cardiovascular risk in adults with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels who either have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or are at risk for a heart attack or stroke. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on adults with high Lp(a) levels and prior or potential cardiovascular events. The study aims to assess the time to the first major adverse cardiovascular event over about 5.25 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either muvalaplin or a placebo, both administered orally. The study includes individuals with Lp(a) levels of at least 175 nanomoles per liter who have had a prior cardiovascular event within 10 years or are at risk for a first event due to conditions such as coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, peripheral artery disease, high coronary artery calcium score, reduced kidney function with diabetes, or other high-risk factors. The treatment period lasts through the study duration, with close monitoring. During the study, participants will be regularly evaluated to track the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes. Safety assessments will monitor blood pressure, kidney function, and heart failure status among other health indicators. The primary outcome measures the time to the first major cardiovascular event from baseline up to the end of the study, which spans approximately 5.25 years.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of orforglipron taken once daily in adults with Fontaine Stage II peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a condition causing pain and difficulty walking due to narrowed arteries. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to understand how orforglipron affects walking ability and overall safety in people with this condition. Participants will be involved in the study for about 58 weeks. Participants will receive either orforglipron or a placebo, both administered orally once daily. The study includes a comparison between these two groups to assess the impact of orforglipron on walking distance and other health outcomes over the course of the trial. During the study, researchers will measure changes in the maximum distance participants can walk compared to their baseline, particularly at the start and after 52 weeks of treatment. Participants will be monitored for safety and any side effects throughout the study. The total duration of participation is approximately 58 weeks, allowing for thorough evaluation of the treatment's effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous lunsekimig compared to a placebo in adults aged 40 to 80 years with inadequately controlled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characterized by an eosinophilic phenotype. This Phase 2b/Phase 3, parallel, 3-arm study focuses on participants who have a history of COPD with an eosinophilic profile and have not achieved control with current treatments. Eligible participants will receive either lunsekimig or a matching placebo through subcutaneous injections over a randomized treatment period of approximately 48 weeks. The study involves three periods: an initial screening period lasting up to 4 weeks, followed by the 48-week treatment period, and finally an 8-week follow-up period. The total study duration may last up to 60 weeks. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for the annualized rate of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations from baseline up to 48 weeks. Researchers will monitor safety, tolerability, and treatment effects through various evaluations throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. Participant involvement includes completing assessments and receiving scheduled injections as part of the study protocol.

Researchers are evaluating maridebart cafraglutide, a drug given as an addition to standard care, to see if it reduces heart-related problems and deaths better than a placebo in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who are overweight or obese. This phase 3 study focuses on cardiovascular events such as heart attacks, strokes, and deaths related to heart conditions, aiming to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Participants will receive either maridebart cafraglutide or a placebo, both administered by injection under the skin. The study compares these two groups over a period of up to approximately 35 months, monitoring heart-related health events to assess the drug's impact. The placebo group will receive injections that look identical but contain no active drug, ensuring a double-blind study design. During the study, participants will be regularly evaluated for major cardiovascular events, including heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and death. Researchers will track the time until these events occur to measure the drug's effectiveness. Safety and health will be closely monitored throughout the study period, and participants will be followed for up to nearly three years to gather comprehensive data on cardiovascular outcomes and overall survival.

Researchers are conducting the FLEX Registry to study patients with stage I to III breast cancer who receive MammaPrint and BluePrint testing on a primary breast tumor. This large-scale, population-based, prospective registry aims to create a comprehensive database of full genome expression linked with clinical data to explore new gene associations that may have prognostic or predictive value. The registry uses an adaptive design, allowing additional targeted substudies and arms to be added over time. The study involves patients from over 125 U.S. institutions, with an anticipated enrollment of around 30,000 participants. Treatment decisions are made by physicians following NCCN-approved regimens or recognized alternatives. MammaPrint and BluePrint tests are performed by Agendia using the full genome testing array. Data collection occurs at enrollment, during treatment, and at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after diagnosis. Participants will have clinical data entered online at specified time points, with the goal of generating hypotheses for targeted subset analyses and further trials based on the genetic data collected. Outcome measures include the creation of a large registry for gene expression and clinical data over 10 years and the development of shared registry infrastructure to study smaller patient groups. This is an observational phase IV study focused on long-term data gathering and analysis.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.