Simi Valley

Researchers are evaluating a blended e-health intervention designed to reduce fear of progression FOP in women with advanced gynecologic or breast cancer. This trial focuses on whether a combination of remote group sessions and online activities can help women manage their fear of cancer worsening, which is a common and distressing concern. The study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this approach alongside its effects on FOP and related psychological symptoms such as distress and anxiety. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups for a 6-week program. The Mindful Living Program group attends three 60-minute group sessions during weeks 1, 3, and 6 and completes online sessions in weeks 2, 4, and 5. They practice mindfulness and coping skills daily for 10-12 minutes, receive a check-in call around week 3 or 4, and have access to supportive online resources. The comparison group participates in the Navigating Cancer Program with a similar schedule of group and online sessions plus a check-in call but without the daily mindfulness practice or additional online tools. During the study, participants complete questionnaires measuring fear of progression, distress, anxiety, mindfulness, and other psychological outcomes at the start, after 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks follow-up. Researchers monitor attendance, engagement, and usability of the intervention over 6 weeks and conduct follow-up assessments at week 12. The total participation time includes the 6-week intervention period plus follow-up, with safety and usability being key measures.

Researchers are evaluating disitamab vedotin alone or combined with pembrolizumab to treat urothelial cancer that expresses HER2. This study focuses on participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. It aims to assess how well the drug works and to monitor the side effects experienced by participants. Participants receive disitamab vedotin intravenously every 2 weeks, either alone or with pembrolizumab given by intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 6-week cycle. The study includes multiple cohorts receiving different combinations or monotherapy treatments. The treatment period and monitoring last approximately 2 years, with ongoing assessments of drug effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests, electrocardiograms to monitor heart function, and assessments of side effects. Researchers measure treatment response using established cancer evaluation criteria and track survival and disease control over about 3 years. Participants are closely monitored for adverse effects and blood levels of the drugs to understand how the treatments behave in the body.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are evaluating telehealth self-management coaching sessions to improve quality of life for people who have survived pancreatic cancer and their family caregivers. Pancreatic cancer and its treatments often cause many symptoms that can negatively affect well-being, and there are few quality of life programs available to support patients and their families during treatment. This trial aims to see if telehealth coaching can help manage physical symptoms and support emotional, social, and spiritual well-being for both patients and caregivers. Participants in the study are divided into two groups. One group attends telehealth coaching sessions lasting 40 to 60 minutes every two weeks for a total of 6 sessions over 3 months. The other group receives the usual standard of care without additional coaching. Both patients and their family caregivers take part in the intervention sessions and assessments. During the study, researchers collect information on patient-reported quality of life at the start and after 3 months. They also track symptom severity, psychological distress, caregiver burden, and overall survival over 6 months. Participants complete questionnaires and interviews at various time points, and the study monitors enrollment, completion rates, and participant experiences. The total participation time may extend up to 6 months to gather follow-up data and evaluate the impact of the coaching sessions.