Vallejo

Researchers are evaluating the safety and tolerability of SPK-8011QQ, a gene therapy, in adult males with moderately severe to severe hemophilia A. This study is a Phase 2b, single-arm, open-label trial focusing on individuals with low factor VIII activity levels who have a history of treatment with factor VIII products. The purpose is to carefully monitor adverse events and treatment effects over an extended period. Participants will receive a single intravenous infusion of SPK-8011QQ on the first day of the study. The study is designed as a single group treatment with no placebo comparator. After the infusion, participants will be followed for up to approximately five years to assess safety and tolerability outcomes, including adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. Throughout the study, participants will attend scheduled visits where safety assessments will be conducted. These include monitoring for adverse events categorized by severity and type, laboratory tests, and antibody screenings. The primary outcomes focus on the frequency and severity of adverse events related to the treatment. The study duration may extend up to five years, allowing for long-term safety monitoring in participants.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of amivantamab combined with either lazertinib or platinum-based chemotherapy in treating participants who have epidermal growth factor receptor mutated EGFRm non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. This study focuses on advanced or metastatic NSCLC cases where standard curative treatments are not suitable. It aims to assess the antitumor activity of these treatment combinations in this patient population. Participants receive either amivantamab with oral lazertinib in 28-day cycles or amivantamab with intravenous chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin and pemetrexed in 21-day cycles. Treatment continues until disease progression, participant withdrawal, death, or investigator decision to stop treatment. The study is designed with two separate groups receiving these distinct treatment combinations. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments to monitor treatment effects and safety. Researchers will measure progression-free survival as the primary outcome up to 4 years and 6 months, along with secondary outcomes including dose adjustments, adverse events, overall survival, response rates, and duration of response. Participants are followed regularly during treatment to track these outcomes and manage any side effects until the studys completion.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of opevesostat combined with daily corticosteroids compared to alternative treatments abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer mCRPC who have previously been treated with one next-generation hormonal agent NHA. The study aims to determine if opevesostat offers better control of disease progression assessed by radiographic progression-free survival, including participants with and without androgen receptor ligand binding domain mutations. Overall survival has also been included as a secondary outcome measure. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives opevesostat 5 mg orally twice daily, plus dexamethasone 1.5 mg and fludrocortisone acetate 0.1 mg orally once daily, continuing until disease progression. Hydrocortisone is available as a rescue medication if needed. The other group receives either abiraterone 1000 mg once daily with prednisone 5 mg twice daily or enzalutamide 160 mg once daily, also until disease progression. This open-label, phase 3 study compares these two treatment approaches in a parallel design. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure disease progression, safety monitoring, and evaluations of overall survival and quality of life. Researchers track radiographic progression-free survival for up to 52 months and secondary outcomes such as overall survival, time to new treatments, pain progression, and prostate-specific antigen PSA responses for up to approximately 82 months. Participants are closely monitored for adverse events and treatment tolerability throughout the study duration, which spans several years.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of Tersolisib LY4064809STX-478 to other anti-cancer drugs as a first treatment for adults with advanced hormone receptor-positive HRhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative HER2- breast cancer that has a PIK3CA mutation. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to understand the efficacy and safety of this combination compared to placebo, focusing on improving outcomes for patients with this specific genetic change. Participants receive LY4064809 orally in one of two doses combined with a CDK46 inhibitor such as Ribociclib, Palbociclib, or Abemaciclib and endocrine therapy ET administered orally or via intramuscular injection. The comparison group receives a placebo combined with the same CDK46 inhibitor and ET. The study includes two parts Part 1 explores dose optimization, and Part 2 evaluates the treatment combinations effectiveness and safety as a first-line therapy. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer response, progression, and safety over an estimated period of up to 5 years or more. Researchers will measure outcomes such as overall response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and quality of life. Treatment continues as long as the cancer benefits without intolerable side effects. Safety monitoring, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires are part of the participant involvement throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of BGB-16673 compared to pirtobrutinib in adults with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma SLL who have previously been treated with a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor cBTKi. The study is a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial sponsored by BeOne Medicines, aiming to assess treatment options for these patients. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either BGB-16673 or pirtobrutinib, both taken orally. This parallel assignment design compares these two drugs directly. The treatments continue with monitoring up to approximately three years to observe progression-free survival and other outcomes. The study began in September 2025 and is expected to complete in April 2028. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure disease status, quality of life questionnaires, and monitoring for adverse events. Outcomes such as overall survival, response rates, duration of response, and time to next treatment are tracked. Safety and quality of life will be evaluated throughout the study period, which may last up to about three years for each participant.

Researchers are conducting a three-part Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate a potential new medicine called Sofetabart Mipitecan Sofe-M in people with high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. The study focuses on patients with platinum-resistant cancer in Part A, meaning their disease worsened during or within six months of platinum-based chemotherapy, and platinum-sensitive cancer in Parts B and C, where disease remained controlled for more than six months after platinum treatment. The goal is to assess whether Sofe-M works better than current standard treatments and to understand its safety. Participants receive treatments administered intravenously. Part A compares Sofe-M to investigators choice of chemotherapy or Mirvetuximab Soravtansine MIRV. Parts B and C compare Sofe-M plus bevacizumab to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The study includes multiple chemotherapy options such as paclitaxel, topotecan, gemcitabine, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Each participants involvement duration depends on their response to treatment. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging to measure progression-free survival and overall survival. Researchers also track tumor marker responses, side effects, quality of life scores, and pharmacokinetics of Sofe-M. The study uses a randomized design without masking. Follow-up can last up to about 70 months, allowing for long-term safety and effectiveness monitoring.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding the immunotherapy drug durvalumab to the usual chemotherapy regimen can improve outcomes for patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk MP2 stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial focuses on comparing breast cancer event-free survival and other measures between patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemotherapy with durvalumab. Immunotherapy may help enhance the bodys immune response against cancer, while chemotherapy works to stop tumor growth in various ways. Participants are first tested for MP2 status using MammaPrint on previously collected tissue. Those with MP2 results are randomized into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for six cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously every 14 days for four cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule combined with durvalumab given intravenously over 60 minutes on specific cycles. Mammography and optional tumor tissue and blood sample collections occur during the study. During the study, participants undergo assessments including mammography, tumor biopsies, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers measure outcomes such as event-free survival, response rates, relapse-free survival, overall survival, treatment side effects, and patient-reported fatigue and physical health. After treatment completion, participants are followed for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and survival. Specimens are also banked for future research.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone in patients with advanced stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase IIIII trial aims to see if nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival in these patients. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy monoclonal antibody that may help the immune system attack cancer, while ramucirumab may prevent tumor blood vessel growth, and paclitaxel stops cancer cells from dividing. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives nivolumab intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, combined with ramucirumab on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15. The other group receives only ramucirumab and paclitaxel on the same schedule without nivolumab. Treatment cycles continue unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. During the study, patients undergo CT scans and MRI imaging, and may optionally provide blood samples. Throughout the trial, participants are monitored with regular imaging and optional blood tests. After treatment ends, patients have follow-up visits at 30, 60, and 90 days, then every six months for up to three years. Researchers assess progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, disease control, safety, and quality of life using questionnaires and patient-reported symptoms. This comprehensive monitoring helps evaluate treatment effects and patient well-being over time.