Wheat Ridge

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan 20 mg taken once daily compared to a placebo in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The main goal is to see how many participants achieve a peak eosinophil count of less than 15 eosinophils per high-power field in the esophagus after 12 weeks of treatment. This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind study involving adult participants with EoE. Participants will receive either vonoprazan 20 mg tablets or matching placebo tablets taken orally once daily. The study includes a primary treatment period of 12 weeks, with an additional evaluation of vonoprazan safety and efficacy up to 24 weeks. Treatment is closely monitored to assess the effects on esophageal inflammation. During the study, participants will be monitored through endoscopic biopsies to measure eosinophil counts in the esophagus. They will also complete electronic diaries to document symptoms like dysphagia. Safety assessments and other clinical evaluations will be conducted throughout the study. The primary outcome is the number of participants achieving the target eosinophil count at week 12, with ongoing monitoring to ensure safety and compliance.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous amlitelimab compared with placebo in people aged 12 years and older who have moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and have not responded well to prior biologic or oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapies. This Phase 3, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study includes participants who are also using background topical corticosteroids (TCS). The goal is to see how well amlitelimab works in improving AD symptoms in this group. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either amlitelimab or placebo by subcutaneous injection while continuing their topical treatments, which may include corticosteroids, tacrolimus, or pimecrolimus. The total treatment period lasts up to 36 weeks during a double-blind phase. After the treatment phase, participants can choose to join a long-term safety study. The full study duration is up to 56 weeks for those not entering the safety study and up to 40 weeks for those who do, including screening, treatment, and safety follow-up periods. During the study, participants will attend up to 13 visits (or 12 for those continuing into the long-term safety study) for assessments including the Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and symptom scoring. Safety monitoring and follow-up visits will track progress, side effects, and treatment response. The primary outcomes focus on improvements in skin clearing and reduction of AD severity at Week 36.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and drug levels of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165) in adolescents aged 12 to less than 18 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to better understand how this treatment affects this condition in younger patients. Participants must have had stable plaque psoriasis for at least six months and meet specific severity criteria. Participants will receive either Deucravacitinib or a placebo at specified doses on designated days. The study compares the drug to placebo to assess its impact on psoriasis symptoms. No additional details about dosing schedules are provided, but the intervention period includes monitoring drug levels and safety. This design allows researchers to evaluate the treatment in a controlled and blinded manner. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for improvement in their psoriasis using measures like the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the static Physicians Global Assessment (sPGA) at week 16. Safety will also be assessed. The primary outcomes include the number of participants achieving at least 75% improvement in PASI and those reaching clear or almost clear skin with a significant reduction in sPGA score. Participants are observed from screening through the intervention period with regular assessments to track efficacy and safety.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib cream in children aged 2 to 11 years with nonsegmental vitiligo, a condition that causes loss of skin color in patches. The study is a Phase 3 trial focusing on this pediatric population to better understand how well the treatment works and how safe it is for young patients. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ruxolitinib cream or a matching vehicle cream, both applied as a thin layer twice daily to the affected skin areas. The treatment is topical and focuses on areas of skin depigmentation, including the face and other body parts. The study measures progress over 24 weeks to determine the proportion of participants who achieve significant improvement in facial vitiligo. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including skin evaluations and safety monitoring. Researchers will track changes in the affected skin areas using the Facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. Participants must stop all other vitiligo treatments before starting and during the study. Safety follow-ups will continue after treatment to ensure participant well-being and gather comprehensive data on treatment effects.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether ibuzatrelvir is effective and safe in adults and adolescents with COVID-19 who do not need to be in the hospital but who are at high risk for progression to severe disease. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (by chance) to receive ibuzatrelvir or matching placebo orally for 5 days. Co-administration of locally available standard of care is allowed. The total duration of the study is around 6 months.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and early effectiveness of DB-1311 combined with either BNT327 or DB-1305 in adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. This phase II, multicenter, open-label trial includes participants with several types of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma, cervical cancer, melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. The study focuses on targeted patients whose cancers have recurred, progressed, or are difficult to treat. The trial involves two treatment combinations delivered intravenously: DB-1311 with BNT327, and DB-1311 with DB-1305. Participants receive these investigational drug combinations under close observation. The study is divided into two parts: the first part evaluates dose-limiting toxicities within 21 days after the first dose, while the second part assesses treatment safety and response rates up to 72 months. This design allows researchers to monitor both short-term safety and long-term treatment effects. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including monitoring for adverse events, tumor response evaluations using RECIST criteria, and organ function tests. The primary outcomes include the number of participants experiencing dose-limiting toxicities early in treatment and the objective response rate, which measures the proportion of participants showing significant tumor shrinkage. Safety monitoring continues throughout the study duration, with follow-up visits extending up to six years to observe long-term effects and participant health.

A randomized study to determine safety and efficacy of single subcutaneous (SC) administration of HAL treatment in patients with CINP.

Researchers are evaluating if adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) compared to OFS plus ET alone. This Phase III trial focuses on premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and has a 21-gene recurrence score between 16-25 for node-negative patients or 0-25 for patients with 1-3 positive nodes. The study addresses the need for better treatment options for younger women diagnosed with this type of breast cancer, as younger age is linked to worse outcomes despite standard therapies. Participants receive one of two treatments: either OFS combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for five years or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same OFS plus AI regimen. The specific AI and GnRH agonist used, along with their dosing schedules, are chosen by the investigator, commonly including goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin administered monthly or every three months. Bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. Endocrine therapy beyond five years is at the investigator's discretion. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival over an 11-year period from randomization. Assessments include clinical evaluations, hormone receptor testing, tumor staging, and genetic recurrence scoring prior to enrollment. Safety and effectiveness data will be collected throughout the study, with particular attention to treatment side effects and long-term outcomes. The trial involves detailed eligibility screening and ongoing follow-up to ensure accurate measurement of the study's primary outcome.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of Suzetrigine in adults with pain caused by diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This phase 3 study focuses on participants who have had diabetes type 1 or type 2 with bilateral lower limb pain for at least one year and aims to compare Suzetrigine's effects against a placebo. Participants will receive either Suzetrigine tablets or a placebo that looks like Suzetrigine, taken orally. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, ensuring that neither participants nor researchers know who receives which treatment. The main goal is to measure the change in weekly average daily pain intensity using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) over 12 weeks. During the study, participants will track their daily pain levels to assess treatment effects. Researchers will monitor safety and tolerability throughout the 12-week period, focusing on changes in pain intensity compared to the baseline. Participants must weigh at least 45 kilograms and have a body mass index between 18 and 40 kg/m². The study allows adults aged 18 to 80 years with controlled diabetes and specific pain levels to join.