Jacksonville Beach

This research aims to observe the long-term safety of efgartigimod treatment in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis gMG. It compares patients who are starting or have recently started efgartigimod treatment with those who have not been exposed to efgartigimod and are receiving other standard treatments. The study is non-interventional and prospective, focusing on real-world safety outcomes over an extended period. Participants are divided into two groups one receiving efgartigimod and another receiving other medications for myasthenia gravis. This study does not involve any new treatments being administered as part of the trial but monitors patients during their routine care. The study will continue for up to 10 years to gather long-term safety data. During the study, researchers will track the occurrence of serious infections and other safety concerns in both groups. Patients will be monitored through their regular clinical visits without additional interventions from the study. Participants may be followed for up to 10 years to assess safety outcomes associated with their treatments in everyday medical practice.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of baxdrostat and dapagliflozin in people with chronic kidney disease CKD and high blood pressure hypertension. This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess whether this combination reduces the risk of serious kidney damage, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death compared to dapagliflozin alone. The study includes participants with CKD and hypertension who meet specific kidney function and blood pressure criteria. Participants who are not already taking SGLT2 inhibitors will first complete a 4-week dapagliflozin run-in period. Then, they will be randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or a placebo plus dapagliflozin. Baxdrostat dosing may start low and be increased if needed. Study visits will occur at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization, and then approximately every four months until the study ends, which is based on the number of key kidney or heart-related events. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including blood tests to monitor kidney function and potassium levels, blood pressure measurements, and evaluations of heart and kidney health. If participants stop the blinded study drug early, they will continue dapagliflozin if possible and remain in the study for ongoing visits and monitoring. The main outcome is whether the combination treatment reduces the risk of a 50% sustained decline in kidney function, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death over up to 37 months.

Researchers are evaluating ivonescimab as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors show high PD-L1 expression. This phase 3 study compares ivonescimab to pembrolizumab, focusing on overall survival and progression-free survival to understand which treatment may better support patients with this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ivonescimab or pembrolizumab through intravenous injection. The study is double-blinded and multiregional, involving continuous treatment and monitoring for up to approximately 36 months. Both groups receive their assigned treatment regularly during this period, with careful observation of treatment responses and side effects. During the trial, participants will undergo evaluations including scans to measure tumor size, laboratory tests, and assessments of adverse events. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, disease control, and duration of response. Safety monitoring will continue for up to 24 months after the last dose. The total study period extends until June 2029, allowing long-term data collection on treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a medicine called BI 690517 combined with empagliflozin in adults with chronic kidney disease CKD who are at risk of their kidney condition getting worse. The study includes people with or without type 2 diabetes and those who may already be taking medicines like angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ACEi, angiotensin receptor blockers ARB, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors SGLT2i. The goal is to understand if adding BI 690517 can help delay worsening kidney function, hospitalizations due to heart failure, or cardiovascular death. After a run-in period where all participants take empagliflozin and other standard medications, participants are randomly assigned to receive either BI 690517 tablets or placebo tablets once daily alongside empagliflozin. The run-in period confirms that participants are stabilized on empagliflozin before randomization. The treatment phase continues for about three to four years until enough kidney or heart-related events have occurred to compare outcomes between the two groups. During the study, participants visit the study site about five times in the first six months and then every six months thereafter. At these visits, health is regularly checked through blood and urine tests, blood pressure and weight measurements, kidney function monitoring, and collection of any side effect information. The main outcome measured is the time until the first occurrence of kidney disease progression, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of Adagrasib alone and in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has a KRAS G12C mutation. The study includes a Phase 2 portion that assesses these treatments in patients with various PD-L1 tumor proportion scores TPS and a Phase 3 portion that compares Adagrasib plus pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone in patients with higher PD-L1 TPS 50%. The goal is to understand how these treatments work as first-line therapy in this patient population. Treatment involves Adagrasib administered orally twice daily BID either alone or combined with pembrolizumab, which is given intravenously at 200 mg every three weeks. Phase 2 includes three cohorts based on PD-L1 status and treatment type, while Phase 3 randomly assigns patients to receive either the combination or pembrolizumab alone. Patients with unresectable or metastatic squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC are included, with specific brain metastases criteria for Phase 3 participants. Participants will be monitored over periods of up to 22 months in Phase 2 and 36 months in Phase 3. Assessments include measuring treatment efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, quality of life, and tumor response using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Regular evaluations involve imaging, clinical exams, and patient-reported outcomes. The study aims to provide detailed information on treatment tolerability and effectiveness during and after therapy.

Researchers are evaluating the therapeutic cancer vaccine OSE2101 in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who have developed secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors ICI. This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focuses on HLA-A2 positive patients with either squamous or non-squamous NSCLC. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of OSE2101 with the standard treatment docetaxel, considering factors like cancer histology and performance status. Participants will be randomized in a 21 ratio to receive either OSE2101 monotherapy or docetaxel monotherapy. OSE2101 is administered as a subcutaneous injection of 5 mg peptides every three weeks for six cycles, then every eight weeks during the first year, and every twelve weeks until the end of the second year. Docetaxel is given as a 75 mgm2 intravenous infusion over one hour every three weeks. Additionally, a companion diagnostic device system is used to assess patient eligibility based on HLA-A2 phenotype. During the study, participants will have regular evaluations including clinical assessments and monitoring of survival time from randomization to death, which is the primary outcome measured over an average of three years. The study involves ongoing monitoring of treatment effects and safety. Participants can expect scheduled visits aligned with treatment cycles and assessments throughout the trial duration, which extends up to nearly five years from start to completion.