Temple Terrace

Researchers are evaluating efruxifermin (EFX) in adults aged 18 to 80 who have compensated cirrhosis caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of EFX in improving liver health and delaying disease progression in this population. The study focuses on subjects with advanced liver fibrosis (stage 4) but without liver decompensation. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either efruxifermin or a placebo, both administered by subcutaneous injection. The study includes two cohorts: Cohort 1 requires biopsy confirmation of liver fibrosis and specific metabolic features, while Cohort 2 allows biopsy or non-invasive diagnosis. Treatment and observation continue over an extended period to evaluate changes in liver fibrosis and clinical events. During the study, researchers will monitor the time until significant clinical events such as disease progression or liver decompensation occur, with a follow-up of up to five years. For Cohort 1, the proportion of participants showing improvement in fibrosis without worsening steatohepatitis will be assessed at 96 weeks. Participants will undergo regular evaluations including clinical assessments and laboratory tests to track liver function and safety throughout the study period.

Researchers are investigating the safety and effectiveness of efruxifermin in people with non-cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have moderate to advanced liver fibrosis (stage 2 or 3). This Phase 3 study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, enrolling a total of 1650 participants in two groups to evaluate treatment outcomes. Participants will receive either efruxifermin or a placebo by subcutaneous injection. The study involves two cohorts, with Cohort 1 including patients who have biopsy-confirmed NASH or MASH and specific liver fibrosis and activity scores. The treatment period and detailed dosing schedules are not provided but the study compares the effects of the active drug against placebo. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvement in liver disease status, including resolution of NASH/MASH and at least a one-stage improvement in liver fibrosis after 52 weeks for Cohort 1. Long-term outcomes such as event-free survival will be observed over 240 weeks. Safety and efficacy assessments will be conducted throughout the study period, including evaluations of liver histology and metabolic health.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Afimkibart (RO7790121) as both an induction and maintenance treatment for people with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease in this Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The goal is to understand how well Afimkibart works compared to placebo in managing symptoms and disease activity over time. Participants will receive either Afimkibart or a matching placebo. Afimkibart is given both as an intravenous infusion and as a subcutaneous injection. This treat-through study means participants continue on the assigned treatment throughout the study period, allowing evaluation of both initial and ongoing therapy effects. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed to measure clinical remission using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and to check for endoscopic response at week 52. Researchers will monitor safety and treatment effects throughout, with the entire participation lasting up to one year. Assessments include clinical evaluations and endoscopic examinations to track disease changes and treatment impact.

Researchers are conducting a two-part, phase 2b/3 study to evaluate CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in adults with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis who have systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes. The study aims to determine the best dose of CSL300 and assess its effects on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in this population. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial targets patients with elevated inflammation markers and significant health risks due to their conditions. In the first part (phase 2b), the study focuses on finding the appropriate dose of CSL300 compared to placebo. CSL300 is given through intravenous (IV) administration. The second part (phase 3) evaluates the impact of CSL300 on cardiovascular events such as heart attack or cardiovascular death over approximately 5 years, continuing to compare CSL300 to placebo for safety and efficacy. The placebo matches CSL300's excipient content but lacks the active drug. Participants will undergo baseline and regular assessments for inflammation markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) up to 12 weeks in phase 2b, and long-term monitoring for cardiovascular outcomes in phase 3. The study involves ongoing safety evaluations and efficacy measurements during the entire follow-up period. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand how CSL300 affects inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of obefazimod compared to a placebo in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease who have not responded well or are intolerant to conventional or advanced treatments. The study is a Phase 2b trial and includes three treatment phases: a 12-week Induction Phase, a 40-week Maintenance Phase, and a 48-week Extension Phase. The main goals are to assess how well obefazimod controls disease activity and its safety over these periods. Participants will receive either obefazimod or a matching placebo once daily, preferably in the morning with food. The trial includes an initial 12-week treatment to induce response, followed by a 40-week maintenance period to sustain results. Those who complete these phases may enter a 48-week Extension Phase to further evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of obefazimod compared to placebo. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including clinical evaluations of disease activity using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index and endoscopic scoring at various time points up to week 52. Safety is monitored throughout, especially during the Extension Phase with checks for adverse events, blood tests, and other laboratory evaluations at scheduled visits. Overall, participation may last over a year, with careful monitoring of treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating ways to improve advance care planning (ACP) among underserved communities, who often receive lower quality end-of-life care and unwanted, costly treatments. This study compares two conversation-based tools designed to encourage discussions about end-of-life wishes and motivate ACP behaviors. The goal is to increase high-quality end-of-life care, reduce health disparities, and lessen unnecessary suffering for patients and families. The study is a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 75 underserved communities across the US. It compares a serious conversation game called Hello, the widely used Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit, and usual care where only an advance directive is distributed. The Hello game has 32 questions prompting sharing of values and beliefs about end-of-life issues, while the CP Starter Kit is a workbook with prompts and resources to facilitate conversations. The third group receives a general conversation game called Table Topics. Participants include adults from underserved populations who have not completed an advance directive in the past 5 years. Researchers will assess completion of a visually verified advance directive six months after the intervention. Other ACP behaviors will also be measured. The study involves community events, follow-up, and data collection to understand which tools best engage underserved groups in ACP and improve end-of-life care outcomes.

Severe open fractures of the lower leg, especially open tibia fractures (Type II or III), often lead to high rates of deep infections, causing disability and reducing the chance of returning to active duty among military personnel. This study evaluates outcomes in patients with these fractures treated with either a prophylactic antibiotic coated intramedullary nail or the traditional standard intramedullary nail. The research aims to prevent infections that can result in rehospitalization and even late amputation, addressing a crucial need for improved infection prevention techniques. The trial compares two treatment groups: one receiving an antibiotic coated intramedullary nail made with a mixture of acrylic cement, vancomycin, and gentamicin applied to the nail at the time of fixation, and the other receiving the standard intramedullary nail without antibiotic coating. Both treatments involve definitive fixation of the fracture using intramedullary nailing during the initial hospital stay. Participants will be followed for 12 months, with data collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months through patient interviews and clinical records. Researchers will measure the number of participants who develop deep surgical site infections during this period to assess the effectiveness of the antibiotic coating in preventing infection.