Homer Glen

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who are considered frail or intermediate-fit and who are not candidates for stem cell transplant. This phase III trial compares three different three-drug induction regimens followed by either single or double drug maintenance therapies. The study aims to find which drug combination best controls the cancer and improves patient outcomes while considering patients age, other health conditions, and physical function. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms. In Arm 1, patients receive bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with bortezomib given subcutaneously and the others taken orally for up to 9 cycles, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 2 involves daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj given subcutaneously, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 3 includes the same induction as Arm 2, but maintenance therapy combines daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj and lenalidomide. Each cycle lasts 28 days, and treatment continues without disease progression or unacceptable side effects. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers monitor progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, minimal residual disease status, and patient-reported symptoms and health status. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for two years, and then annually for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with metastatic kidney cancer, focusing on whether adding surgery to a standard immunotherapy-based drug combination improves overall survival. This phase III trial compares outcomes for patients receiving immunotherapy with or without surgery to remove the kidney, known as nephrectomy. Immunotherapy drugs like nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and avelumab aim to help the immune system attack the cancer, while axitinib works to block tumor growth. The benefit of adding surgery to these drug treatments is not yet established. Participants first receive one of three standard immunotherapy-based regimens before randomization, including combinations of intravenous nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, avelumab, and oral axitinib. After about 10 to 14 weeks of this initial treatment, patients are randomly assigned to continue systemic therapy alone or to receive surgery to remove the kidney plus the same systemic therapy. Surgery may be radical or partial and performed using laparoscopic, open, or robotic methods within 8 weeks of randomization. Axitinib is paused before surgery and resumed after recovery. Throughout the study, participants undergo scans and clinical assessments to monitor tumor response and side effects. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months during the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually thereafter for up to seven years. The trial measures overall survival, tumor response in metastatic sites, changes in tumor size, and complications from surgery or drug toxicities. Specimens are also collected for future research to better understand the disease and treatments.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.

This research aims to evaluate how well inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab, with or without ponatinib, work in treating adults with newly diagnosed, recurrent, or refractory CD22-positive B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia ALL. The study focuses on patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative or positive B-cell ALL, including those who are older or transplant-ineligible. It also seeks to assess safety, tolerability, survival outcomes, response rates, and molecular markers related to treatment effectiveness. Participants are assigned to one of three cohorts based on their disease status and Philadelphia chromosome presence. Cohorts 1 and 2 receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously on specific days, followed by blinatumomab infusions, while cohort 3 receives a combination of ponatinib orally, inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and other treatments over multiple courses. Treatment courses vary in length from 21 to 126 days, with maintenance ponatinib for 24 months in cohort 3. Bone marrow aspirations, biopsies, lumbar punctures, and sample collections are performed throughout the study. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood and cerebrospinal fluid sample collections, bone marrow evaluations, and monitoring for treatment response and safety. Researchers measure event-free survival, overall survival, relapse-free survival, response rates, minimal residual disease negativity, and molecular response over periods up to 10 years. After treatment completion, participants are followed every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes.

Researchers are studying how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works when combined with frontline chemotherapy in treating young adults aged 18 to 39 years with newly diagnosed B acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is CD22 positive. This phase III trial investigates the side effects and effectiveness of this combination compared to chemotherapy alone, aiming to improve event-free survival and other outcomes. The study also explores genetic and molecular markers to better understand treatment response and risks. Participants receive a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen called CALGB 10403, which includes multiple courses of treatment remission induction, remission consolidation, interim maintenance, delayed intensification, and maintenance therapy. Some patients also receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously on specific days, followed by blinatumomab if minimal residual disease is detected. Treatment cycles repeat according to response and tolerance, with additional therapies like rituximab and radiation as needed. Imaging and laboratory tests are done throughout. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and imaging such as echocardiography or multigated acquisition scans. Researchers measure outcomes like event-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects for up to 10 years. After treatment, patients are followed closely every few months for up to 10 years to monitor long-term effects and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab in treating patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. This phase III trial aims to compare overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and safety between these treatments. The study also explores patient-reported quality of life, treatment adherence, minimal residual disease status, and imaging associations during therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives daratumumab intravenously on a detailed schedule across up to 24 courses, plus oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days and dexamethasone on specific days during the first 12 courses. The second group receives only oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone on a similar schedule for up to 24 courses. Treatment cycles repeat every 28 days unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants complete quality-of-life questionnaires and undergo laboratory tests, including minimal residual disease assessments and PETCT imaging. Safety is closely monitored, especially infusion-related reactions and toxicity. After treatment, patients are followed for up to 15 years with periodic visits every 3 to 12 months to track long-term outcomes and survival.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.

Researchers are evaluating how well serum tumor marker directed disease monitoring STMDDM works compared to usual care in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This trial aims to see if monitoring with serum tumor markers can provide similar overall survival outcomes to the standard approach, which involves regular imaging scans. The study also looks at healthcare costs, patient anxiety, and quality of life related to these monitoring methods. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the usual care group, patients receive imaging studies at least every 12 weeks and may have serum tumor marker tests as determined by their doctor. In the STMDDM group, patients have blood tests for specific tumor markers every 4 to 8 weeks, and imaging scans are only done if these markers indicate a possible progression of disease. Both groups continue their monitoring for up to 312 weeks unless the disease progresses. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood tests for tumor markers, imaging scans as needed, and questionnaires about anxiety and quality of life. Researchers track overall survival for up to 312 weeks and compare healthcare costs and patient-reported outcomes for up to 48 to 102 weeks. The study also collects data on how often and by what methods disease monitoring is performed, along with patient and physician preferences related to monitoring.

Researchers are evaluating a phase III trial comparing shorter chemotherapy-immunotherapy without anthracycline drugs to the usual chemo-immunotherapy for treating early-stage triple negative breast cancer TNBC. This study aims to see if the shorter treatment works as well as the usual anthracycline-containing treatment. The trial also assesses patient-reported outcomes like fatigue and physical function, as well as safety and survival measures. It involves participants with specific stages of TNBC and includes detailed evaluations of tumor response and immune markers. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives paclitaxel, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab followed by doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and pembrolizumab, then surgery, with possible pembrolizumab after surgery. The other group receives docetaxel, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab prior to surgery, with possible pembrolizumab after surgery. Blood samples may be collected throughout the trial for research purposes. During the study, participants undergo surgery after chemotherapy-immunotherapy. They are followed every six months for two years, then annually up to five years. Assessments include breast cancer event-free survival, pathological response, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, and patient-reported fatigue and physical function. Quality of life and other patient-reported symptoms are also evaluated. Specimens are banked for future research. The total participation may last up to five years from registration.