Melrose Park

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of elecoglipron, an oral tablet taken once daily, for weight management in adults with obesity or overweight. This Phase III global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial includes two independent pivotal studies one in adults without type 2 diabetes T2DM and the other in adults with T2DM, all having at least one weight-related health condition. The goal is to understand how elecoglipron compares to placebo when combined with diet and exercise. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one of two doses of elecoglipron or a matching placebo daily. Study 1 involves about 3000 adults living with obesity or overweight without T2DM, while Study 2 involves about 1500 adults with obesity or overweight and T2DM. Both studies last 72 weeks, during which changes in body weight and other health measures will be monitored. During the trial, participants will undergo regular health assessments including measurements of body weight, waist circumference, blood sugar control, blood pressure, and other related health indicators. Researchers will track percent change in body weight from baseline at 72 weeks as the primary outcome. Participants will be monitored closely throughout the study to assess safety and effectiveness of the treatment in managing weight and associated health conditions.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study. This trial focuses on patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASCVD or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study aims to assess how AZD0780 compares to placebo in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, also known as MACE-PLUS, over the course of the trial. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 once daily or a matching placebo once daily. The study continues until a primary analysis censoring date, which may be up to approximately 54 months from randomization. After this, a study closure visit will be conducted as the final visit for each participant. During the study, participants will be regularly monitored for cardiovascular events including heart attacks, strokes, urgent coronary revascularizations, and other related outcomes. Researchers will track the time to first occurrence of these events as the primary outcome. Safety and other secondary outcomes like all-cause mortality will also be assessed. The total participation time can last up to about 54 months, with ongoing evaluations throughout this period.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a study drug called elecoglipron compared with oral semaglutide in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus T2DM who have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The study focuses on adults whose diabetes is not adequately controlled by lifestyle changes or stable treatment with other glucose-lowering medications. This is a phase III randomized trial sponsored by AstraZeneca, aiming to compare these two oral medications in managing T2DM and cardiovascular risk. Participants will be assigned to receive either elecoglipron or semaglutide, both administered orally once daily at specified doses. The study runs in parallel groups, with one group receiving elecoglipron and the other receiving semaglutide. Treatment and observation will continue for 52 weeks, during which the effects on blood sugar control and other health indicators will be evaluated. Throughout the 52-week study period, participants will undergo regular assessments including measurements of Hemoglobin A1c HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure. Researchers will monitor changes from baseline to week 52 to understand the drugs impact on diabetes control and cardiovascular risk factors. The study also tracks safety and tolerability to ensure participant wellbeing during the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a vaccine designed to reduce Clostridioides difficile C. difficile infections in adults aged 65 years and older. This phase 3 study compares the vaccine to a placebo in a group of older adults who have recent or planned contact with healthcare systems or recent antibiotic use. The purpose is to understand how well the vaccine works to prevent infections and to monitor any side effects or reactions. Participants will receive either the C. difficile vaccine or a placebo shot injected into the upper arm muscle. The study is randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled. The vaccination period includes two doses and participants will be monitored for up to about three and a half years. Follow-up includes three planned clinical visits and three phone visits initially, then yearly clinic visits until the study ends. Participants are asked to report and save stool samples if they experience three or more loose stools in 24 hours to check for possible infection. During the study, researchers will track local and systemic reactions to the vaccine within seven days after each shot, adverse events up to one month after each vaccination, and serious adverse events for up to 18 months after the last dose. The main measurement is the occurrence of medically attended primary C. difficile infections from two weeks after the second vaccination through the surveillance period. Safety monitoring and annual visits will continue until the study is completed, which could be sooner or later depending on infection rates.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating treatment options for patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who are considered frail or intermediate-fit and who are not candidates for stem cell transplant. This phase III trial compares three different three-drug induction regimens followed by either single or double drug maintenance therapies. The study aims to find which drug combination best controls the cancer and improves patient outcomes while considering patients age, other health conditions, and physical function. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms. In Arm 1, patients receive bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with bortezomib given subcutaneously and the others taken orally for up to 9 cycles, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 2 involves daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj given subcutaneously, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Arm 3 includes the same induction as Arm 2, but maintenance therapy combines daratumumab with hyaluronidase-fihj and lenalidomide. Each cycle lasts 28 days, and treatment continues without disease progression or unacceptable side effects. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers monitor progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, minimal residual disease status, and patient-reported symptoms and health status. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for two years, and then annually for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with metastatic kidney cancer, focusing on whether adding surgery to a standard immunotherapy-based drug combination improves overall survival. This phase III trial compares outcomes for patients receiving immunotherapy with or without surgery to remove the kidney, known as nephrectomy. Immunotherapy drugs like nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and avelumab aim to help the immune system attack the cancer, while axitinib works to block tumor growth. The benefit of adding surgery to these drug treatments is not yet established. Participants first receive one of three standard immunotherapy-based regimens before randomization, including combinations of intravenous nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, avelumab, and oral axitinib. After about 10 to 14 weeks of this initial treatment, patients are randomly assigned to continue systemic therapy alone or to receive surgery to remove the kidney plus the same systemic therapy. Surgery may be radical or partial and performed using laparoscopic, open, or robotic methods within 8 weeks of randomization. Axitinib is paused before surgery and resumed after recovery. Throughout the study, participants undergo scans and clinical assessments to monitor tumor response and side effects. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months during the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually thereafter for up to seven years. The trial measures overall survival, tumor response in metastatic sites, changes in tumor size, and complications from surgery or drug toxicities. Specimens are also collected for future research to better understand the disease and treatments.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.

This research aims to evaluate how well inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab, with or without ponatinib, work in treating adults with newly diagnosed, recurrent, or refractory CD22-positive B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia ALL. The study focuses on patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative or positive B-cell ALL, including those who are older or transplant-ineligible. It also seeks to assess safety, tolerability, survival outcomes, response rates, and molecular markers related to treatment effectiveness. Participants are assigned to one of three cohorts based on their disease status and Philadelphia chromosome presence. Cohorts 1 and 2 receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously on specific days, followed by blinatumomab infusions, while cohort 3 receives a combination of ponatinib orally, inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and other treatments over multiple courses. Treatment courses vary in length from 21 to 126 days, with maintenance ponatinib for 24 months in cohort 3. Bone marrow aspirations, biopsies, lumbar punctures, and sample collections are performed throughout the study. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including blood and cerebrospinal fluid sample collections, bone marrow evaluations, and monitoring for treatment response and safety. Researchers measure event-free survival, overall survival, relapse-free survival, response rates, minimal residual disease negativity, and molecular response over periods up to 10 years. After treatment completion, participants are followed every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes.

Researchers are studying how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works when combined with frontline chemotherapy in treating young adults aged 18 to 39 years with newly diagnosed B acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is CD22 positive. This phase III trial investigates the side effects and effectiveness of this combination compared to chemotherapy alone, aiming to improve event-free survival and other outcomes. The study also explores genetic and molecular markers to better understand treatment response and risks. Participants receive a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen called CALGB 10403, which includes multiple courses of treatment remission induction, remission consolidation, interim maintenance, delayed intensification, and maintenance therapy. Some patients also receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously on specific days, followed by blinatumomab if minimal residual disease is detected. Treatment cycles repeat according to response and tolerance, with additional therapies like rituximab and radiation as needed. Imaging and laboratory tests are done throughout. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and imaging such as echocardiography or multigated acquisition scans. Researchers measure outcomes like event-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects for up to 10 years. After treatment, patients are followed closely every few months for up to 10 years to monitor long-term effects and disease status.