O'Fallon

This research aims to better understand the natural history of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes CMS caused by mutations in the DOK7, MUSK, AGRN, or LRP4 genes. It evaluates disease activity by collecting clinical data and quality of life information from participants with these specific genetic mutations. The study is observational and involves participants aged 2 years and older diagnosed with CMS due to these mutations. Participants will attend up to four study visits where clinical assessments will be performed. These assessments include evaluating symptoms and quality of life using tools like the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis QMG score and other standardized measures. The study collects both retrospective and prospective data on diagnosis, healthcare use, medications, and health status changes related to CMS over a period of up to 12 months. During the study, participants will undergo various evaluations including symptom scoring, questionnaires on daily living activities, fatigue, and health-related quality of life. Researchers will analyze changes from baseline in these measures to understand disease progression and impact. No investigational treatments are given, and the focus is on monitoring and documenting the condition. Participation may last up to 12 months with scheduled visits for data collection and assessments.

This research aims to observe the long-term safety of efgartigimod treatment in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis gMG. It compares patients who are starting or have recently started efgartigimod treatment with those who have not been exposed to efgartigimod and are receiving other standard treatments. The study is non-interventional and prospective, focusing on real-world safety outcomes over an extended period. Participants are divided into two groups one receiving efgartigimod and another receiving other medications for myasthenia gravis. This study does not involve any new treatments being administered as part of the trial but monitors patients during their routine care. The study will continue for up to 10 years to gather long-term safety data. During the study, researchers will track the occurrence of serious infections and other safety concerns in both groups. Patients will be monitored through their regular clinical visits without additional interventions from the study. Participants may be followed for up to 10 years to assess safety outcomes associated with their treatments in everyday medical practice.

Researchers are evaluating the pharmacodynamic effect, safety, and tolerability of Povetacicept in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis gMG. This phase 2 study focuses on participants aged 18 to 80 years who have generalized muscle weakness and fall within the MGFA clinical classification II-IV. The study aims to better understand how Povetacicept affects immunoglobulin levels and the safety profile in this population. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of two doses of Povetacicept or a placebo via subcutaneous injection for the initial 12 weeks. Those who are eligible may continue treatment with Povetacicept for an additional 96 weeks in a long-term extension phase. This study uses a double-blind, placebo-controlled design to evaluate the treatment over a total period of up to 108 weeks. During the study, participants will undergo evaluations of immunoglobulin G levels at baseline and week 12. Safety and tolerability will be monitored throughout the entire treatment period by tracking adverse and serious adverse events. The study includes regular assessments to measure outcomes and monitor participant health, with the goal of completing by March 2029.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy compared to standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with advanced urothelial cancer that has spread locally or to other parts of the body. This phase III trial focuses on patients whose cancer has not responded to prior anti-PDL1 therapy. The study aims to compare overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, duration of response, treatment side effects, and quality of life between the new combination therapy and usual chemotherapy care. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard chemotherapy options such as carboplatin or cisplatin with gemcitabine, or alternatively docetaxel or paclitaxel, given intravenously in 21-day cycles for up to six cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable side effects. The other group receives pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for up to 35 cycles or two years, unless disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. Both groups undergo blood tests and imaging scans like CT or MRI throughout the study. During the trial, participants will have regular assessments including blood sample collection and imaging to monitor their cancer status and treatment effects. Researchers will also evaluate patient-reported quality of life and fatigue at multiple time points up to 12 months. After completing treatment, participants are followed up 30 days later and then annually for five years to track survival and health outcomes. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand both the clinical outcomes and the impact on patients well-being over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of combining inavolisib with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor CDK46i and letrozole compared to placebo plus CDK46i and letrozole in adults with endocrine-sensitive PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive HR, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. This phase III, randomized, double-blind study focuses on participants who have measurable disease and meet specific hormone receptor and HER2 status criteria. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either oral inavolisib once daily along with letrozole and CDK46i or placebo once daily with letrozole and CDK46i. The CDK46i is given on a schedule of either Days 1-21 or Days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle. The study includes parallel groups to compare these treatment combinations over time. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, duration of response, clinical benefit, and changes in pain, physical function, and global health status. Safety will be assessed by tracking adverse events and patient-reported treatment side effects using questionnaires. The study will follow participants for up to seven years, with regular evaluations to track disease status and quality of life.

This trial is for adults with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma HNSCC that has not been treated with systemic therapy before. The study compares the anti-tumor effects of amivantamab combined with pembrolizumab and carboplatin against pembrolizumab with 5-fluorouracil and platinum therapy carboplatin or cisplatin. Participants have HNSCC in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx but not nasopharynx or unknown primary tumor sites, and HPV status is considered for oropharynx cases. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives pembrolizumab, amivantamab, and carboplatin, while the other receives pembrolizumab, 5-fluorouracil given as a 4-day infusion, and carboplatin or cisplatin. Treatments are given according to standard protocols for these drugs. The study is open-label and conducted across multiple centers. During the trial, participants will be monitored for overall survival and tumor response using established criteria up to about 3 years and 7 months. Additional assessments include progression-free survival, duration of response, quality of life questionnaires specific to head and neck cancer, and safety evaluations through adverse event and lab test monitoring. Blood samples will check amivantamab levels and antibodies. Participation involves regular visits for treatment and assessments throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying adults with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy CIDP to understand why they choose certain treatments, particularly switching to HyQvia, and how satisfied they are with HyQvia and their previous therapies. The study also explores how CIDP affects work productivity and daily activities, as well as the signs and symptoms of CIDP. The research collects information on medical problems or side effects during HyQvia treatment, its effectiveness, and healthcare needs such as emergency or hospital visits. Participants are divided into two groups those who plan to switch to HyQvia within six weeks after joining the study and those who have already switched within six weeks before joining. Data will be collected over 12 months through interviews, medical record reviews, and questionnaires. Treatment follows the doctors usual clinical care and is not controlled by the study. During the study, participants will complete questionnaires about their treatment preferences, satisfaction, quality of life, disability, and work productivity at the start and throughout the 12 months. Researchers will monitor any adverse effects and changes in physical strength and disability scores. Healthcare use and treatment details will be tracked regularly to understand the real-world use and impact of HyQvia in managing CIDP.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of iza-bren, a bi-specific antibody-drug conjugate targeting EGFR and HER3 with a chemotherapy payload, compared to treatment chosen by physicians including paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin plus gemcitabine, and capecitabine for patients with first-line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer TNBC or low estrogen receptor ER-low, HER2-negative breast cancer who cannot receive anti-PDL1 or endocrine therapies. This study includes adults with locally advanced, recurrent inoperable, or metastatic disease who meet specific eligibility criteria. Participants are randomly assigned to receive iza-bren or one of the physicians choice chemotherapy regimens. The treatments are given at specified doses on scheduled days. The study includes two phases Phase 2 to determine the recommended dose of iza-bren and Phase 3 to compare progression-free survival and other outcomes. The study will last several years, with follow-up extending up to approximately 47 months after randomization. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests, and monitoring for adverse events. Quality of life questionnaires will also be completed. Researchers will track progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related side effects, tumor size changes, and patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the treatments. The total participation duration may extend up to several years depending on treatment response and follow-up requirements.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of JNJ-79635322 in adults with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma RRMM, a type of cancer affecting plasma cells. This study focuses on participants who have already undergone at least three previous treatments, including specific therapies such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 antibodies. The study is conducted in a Phase 2, open-label format to assess how well this treatment works in this patient group. Participants will receive JNJ-79635322 through injections under the skin. The study involves a single group where all participants receive this investigational drug. The treatment period lasts up to two years and nine months, during which the medications effects and participants responses are closely monitored. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to measure various outcomes, including overall response rate, survival times, symptom changes, and quality of life using specialized questionnaires. Researchers will also monitor safety by tracking adverse events and checking for antibodies against the drug. The total participation duration may last up to nearly three years, allowing comprehensive evaluation of both effectiveness and safety over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of adding intensity-modulated post-operative radiation therapy I-PORT to standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who still have lymph node cancer after surgery. This phase II trial aims to see if I-PORT improves disease-free survival and whether it increases serious heart or lung side effects compared to standard care alone. The study also looks at overall survival, cancer control, and patient-reported symptoms related to heart and lung health. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone, continuing treatment if the cancer does not progress or side effects are manageable. The other group receives I-PORT once daily Monday through Friday for 5 to 6 weeks, starting 4 to 12 weeks after surgery, followed by the same standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Imaging scans and blood samples are collected during treatment in both groups. After completing treatment, participants are followed for five years with check-ups every three months for two years, then every six months for three years. During these visits, researchers assess disease recurrence, survival, side effects, and patient symptoms. The study uses various scans including CT, MRI, and FDG-PET, along with blood tests, to monitor participants health and treatment impact over time.