Oak Lawn

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tenapanor in adults with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation CIC. This study is a 26-week, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial followed by a 4-week treatment-free safety follow-up period. It aims to compare three different doses of tenapanor with a placebo taken twice daily to assess their impact on constipation symptoms. The study includes a 2-week screening period to confirm eligibility, followed by a 26-week randomized treatment period where patients receive either 5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg of tenapanor twice daily, or a matching placebo. Patients record their constipation symptoms daily in an electronic diary. After the treatment period, there is a 4-week safety follow-up without treatment to monitor any adverse effects. Participants will have regular visits every 2 to 6 weeks for safety checks including medical assessments, vital signs, ECG, and lab tests. Their symptom diaries will be reviewed throughout the study. The main outcome measured is the durable complete spontaneous bowel movements response at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include changes in bowel movement frequency, stool consistency, and straining. The total study duration is approximately 32 weeks including all phases.

Researchers are evaluating how well combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with newly diagnosed stages 2 to 4 diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor DAWT and patients with relapsed favorable histology Wilms tumor FHWT. This phase II trial compares the effects of two chemotherapy regimens, UH-3 and ICECycloTopo, on event-free survival and overall survival, aiming to improve outcomes based on different relapse risk groups and prior treatments. The study also explores kidney toxicity, genetic markers, surgery impacts, and radiation therapy techniques to reduce side effects and better understand tumor behavior. Participants are assigned to one of two treatment groups. In Arm I Regimen UH-3, patients receive cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan intravenously over various days in a 21-day cycle, with radiation therapy at week 7 of cycle 3 if needed. In Arm II Regimen ICECycloTopo, patients receive cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, and topotecan intravenously over 10 cycles every 21 days, with surgery andor radiation therapy during certain cycles as clinically indicated. Throughout the trial, patients undergo multiple imaging tests including CT scans, PET scans, chest x-rays, MRIs, abdominal ultrasounds, and bone scans, along with blood sample collections and biopsies. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3 and 4, and once at year 5. The main outcomes measured are event-free survival and overall survival up to 5 years from study entry, with ongoing monitoring for treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the drugs eltrekibart and mirikizumab in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis UC, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. This Phase 2 study aims to find out how these treatments work alone or in combination to improve UC symptoms and health. The study is sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and will last about 4 to 5 years, including screening. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of several treatments eltrekibart with a placebo, mirikizumab with a placebo, both drugs together, or placebo alone. The study is double-blinded, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is given to ensure unbiased results. The treatment period includes dosing with the study drugs or placebo, and participants will be monitored for safety and response. Participants will be involved in the trial for around 69 weeks, including a screening period of up to 35 days before starting treatment. Throughout the study, they will undergo assessments to measure clinical remission, response, endoscopic improvement, and quality of life using questionnaires. Blood samples will be taken to study drug levels, and researchers will monitor safety and disease activity regularly. The main outcome is the percentage of participants achieving clinical remission at Week 12, with additional measures assessed up to Week 52.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the VARIPULSE pulsed field ablation PFA catheter compared to the FDA-approved FARAWAVE PFA catheter in people with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation PsAF, a condition characterized by continuous irregular and rapid heartbeats lasting more than 7 days without stopping on its own. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare these two devices used in catheter ablation to treat PsAF. Participants with PsAF will undergo catheter ablation using either the VARIPULSE catheter or the FARAWAVE catheter. After the ablation procedure, they will be followed for up to 12 months to monitor outcomes. The study involves two parallel groups receiving one of the two PFA devices during the ablation treatment. During the study, participants will be assessed for early adverse events within 7 days after the procedure and monitored for occurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes starting from day 61 onward. Quality of life changes will also be measured at baseline and 6 months after the procedure using a specific questionnaire. Follow-up includes regular testing and monitoring to evaluate the safety and performance of the catheters over the 12-month period.

Researchers are evaluating the use of Vedolizumab in adults with moderate to severely active Ulcerative Colitis UC or Crohns Disease CD, which are chronic gut conditions causing symptoms such as diarrhea, inflammation, bleeding, and abdominal pain. The study aims to measure how many participants achieve remission, meaning their symptoms disappear, after 14 weeks of treatment. This is a Phase 4 treatment study sponsored by Takeda, focusing on the effectiveness of Vedolizumab administered in a community setting. Participants with either UC or CD will receive Vedolizumab intravenously IV during the first 6 weeks, with doses given at Weeks 0 and 2, and possibly an additional IV dose at Week 6. After this initial period, participants may switch to subcutaneous under the skin injections of Vedolizumab every two weeks from Week 6 until Week 50. If the treatment does not appear effective by Week 14, participants may stop Vedolizumab and switch to another therapy. Additional required visits occur at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, with a final check 18 weeks after the last Vedolizumab dose. Throughout the study, participants will visit the clinic multiple times for treatment and monitoring. Assessments include patient-reported symptom measures at Weeks 6, 14, and 52, clinical response evaluations, and endoscopic examinations to observe mucosal healing. Blood and stool tests will measure inflammation markers like C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin. Safety monitoring will track serious infections up to 72 weeks. Overall, participants are involved for about one year of treatment plus follow-up to evaluate the long-term effects of Vedolizumab.

This trial studies children, adolescents, and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome positive Ph or ABL-class Philadelphia chromosome-like Ph-like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia B-ALL. It evaluates the combination of blinatumomab with dasatinib or imatinib alongside standard chemotherapy. The study aims to estimate 3-year event-free survival and overall survival, describe safety and toxicity, and explore treatment responses and immune function in these patients. Participants receive a modified chemotherapy regimen including multiple cycles of blinatumomab without traditional consolidation chemotherapy combined with continuous tyrosine kinase inhibitors dasatinib or imatinib depending on fusion subtype. Treatment includes induction phases, blinatumomab blocks, interim maintenance, delayed intensification, and maintenance cycles over two years, with various drugs administered orally, intravenously, or intrathecally. Radiation therapy may be given in some cases. Throughout the study, participants undergo blood and cerebrospinal fluid sample collection, bone marrow biopsies, and heart function tests such as echocardiography or multigated acquisition scans. Researchers monitor minimal residual disease, treatment-related side effects, and long-term outcomes up to three years. The study involves regular assessments to evaluate treatment effectiveness and safety over the full duration of therapy.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment approach for children and young adults newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia AML, including those with and without FLT3 gene mutations. The trial compares standard chemotherapy using daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin to therapy with CPX-351, a liposome-encapsulated form of daunorubicin and cytarabine, andor the drug gilteritinib which may block abnormal FLT3 gene function. The study aims to understand which treatment works better and to monitor heart function changes during and after therapy. Participants are assigned to different treatment groups based on their risk and FLT3 mutation status. Treatments include various chemotherapy regimens delivered intravenously and intrathecally, with some groups receiving CPX-351 and others receiving standard drugs. Patients with FLT3 mutations receive additional oral gilteritinib for extended periods, including maintenance therapy up to one year. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is also part of the treatment for some high-risk patients following chemotherapy courses. During the study, participants will undergo multiple assessments including blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, imaging scans, and neuropsychological testing to monitor leukemia status and treatment effects. Cardiac function is closely followed using echocardiography and biomarkers. Patient outcomes such as event-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease, relapse rates, and treatment safety are tracked for up to three years. The total study participation may extend over several years with ongoing evaluations.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are studying the effects of camlipixant in adults with two types of irritable bowel syndrome IBS-D diarrhea-predominant and IBS-M mixed type. This Phase 2b trial aims to assess how well camlipixant works and how safe it is when compared to a placebo. The study includes two parts, where after the first part, some participants may be randomly assigned to receive a higher dose of camlipixant or stop taking the drug. Participants receive camlipixant at different dose levels or a placebo during the first part of the study. In the second part, all participants are randomized again to either continue with camlipixant or placebo. The treatment lasts up to 26 weeks, with doses adjusted in the second phase. The study uses a triple-blind design where neither participants nor researchers know who receives which treatment during the trial. During the study, participants will regularly report their abdominal pain intensity and stool form using specific scoring systems. Researchers will monitor safety by tracking adverse events and changes in vital signs and laboratory tests. The main outcome measures focus on changes in abdominal pain intensity over weeks 7 to 12. Participants will be assessed throughout the 26-week period to evaluate the treatments effects and safety.